One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision of the Infected Knee Arthroplasty
One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision of the Infected Knee Arthroplasty. a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.
This study investigates functional outcome and safety after one-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty.
Half of participants are treated with a one-stage surgical procedure, while the other half is treated with a two-stage procedure.
The investigators hypothesize that the functional outcome and quality of life of the participants is superior after one-stage surgery compared to two-stage surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A two-stage approach is the standard surgical procedure in the treatment of the chronically infected knee arthroplasty, but promising results have been reported after a one-stage approach from single-centre studies.
The potential benefits for the patients treated with a one-stage approach are many as they only have to go through surgery and rehabilitation once with shorter total length of hospital stay. However, no randomized controlled trials comparing outcome after the procedures have been performed so far.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Martin Lindberg-Larsen, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 0045 25213900
- Email: martin.lindberg-larsen@rsyd.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aalborg, Denmark
- Aalborg University Hospital
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Rigshospitalet
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Bispebjerg Hospital
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Gentofte Hospital
-
Copenhagen, Denmark
- Hvidovre Hospital
-
Horsens, Denmark
- Horsens Hospital
-
Næstved, Denmark
- Næstved Hospital
-
Odense, Denmark
- Odense Universitets Hospital
-
Vejle, Denmark
- Vejle Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical signs of periprosthetic knee infection
- > 6 weeks from previous knee arthoplasty procedure (primary or total revision procedure)
- Speak and understand Danish and have given informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Soft tissue problems requiring plastic surgery
- major bone loss requiring mega/tumor-prosthesis
- acute surgery due to sepsis
- malignant disease with less than 2 years life expectancy
- re-infection with previous two-stage procedure
- bilateral knee infection
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: one-stage
one-stage surgical treatment of the infected knee arthroplasty
|
one-stage surgery
|
|
Active Comparator: two-stage
two-stage surgical treatment of the infected knee arthroplasty with a interim period of 8-10 weeks between stages
|
two-stage surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oxford Knee Score (AUC)
Time Frame: preoperatively 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 months postoperatively.
|
Area Under Curve for Oxford Knee Score
|
preoperatively 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 months postoperatively.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oxford Knee Score (AUC)
Time Frame: preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
Area Under Curve for Oxford Knee Score
|
preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
Quality of life questionnaire
|
preoperatively, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Re-revision rate
Time Frame: 2 year postoperatively
|
re-revisions due to infection and other causes
|
2 year postoperatively
|
|
mortality
Time Frame: 90 days postoperatively and 1 and 2 year postoperatively
|
postoperative mortality
|
90 days postoperatively and 1 and 2 year postoperatively
|
|
readmission rate
Time Frame: 90 days postoperatively
|
postoperative readmission rate
|
90 days postoperatively
|
|
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 2 years postoperatively
|
Range of motion of the infected/operated knee
|
2 years postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Martin Lindberg-Larsen
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lindberg-Larsen M, Jorgensen CC, Bagger J, Schroder HM, Kehlet H. Revision of infected knee arthroplasties in Denmark. Acta Orthop. 2016 Aug;87(4):333-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1148453. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
- Lindberg-Larsen M, Pitter FT, Voldstedlund M, Schroder HM, Bagger J. Microbiological diagnosis in revision of infected knee arthroplasties in Denmark. Infect Dis (Lond). 2017 Nov-Dec;49(11-12):824-830. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1350878. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
- Masters JP, Smith NA, Foguet P, Reed M, Parsons H, Sprowson AP. A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jul 29;14:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-222.
- Haddad FS, Sukeik M, Alazzawi S. Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3721-8.
- Singer J, Merz A, Frommelt L, Fink B. High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2174-6. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
- Baker P, Petheram TG, Kurtz S, Konttinen YT, Gregg P, Deehan D. Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two-stage revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2713-20. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2090-7. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
- Massin P, Delory T, Lhotellier L, Pasquier G, Roche O, Cazenave A, Estellat C, Jenny JY. Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3131-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3884-1. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
- Lindberg-Larsen M, Odgaard A, Fredborg C, Schroder HM; One-stage vs Two-stage Collaboration Group. One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 12;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04044-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MLL_02_2018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Periprosthetic Knee Infection
-
NCT07299565Recruiting
-
NCT06944184CompletedPeriprosthetic Knee Infection
-
NCT04427943Active, not recruitingPeriprosthetic Knee Infection
-
NCT07494630Active, not recruitingChronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection | Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection | Prosthetic Joint Failure of Unclear Etiology
-
NCT07313215RecruitingPeriprosthetic Joint Infection
-
NCT07232771CompletedReinfection | Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) | Total Knee Arthroplasty | Revision | Aseptic Loosening
-
NCT07599865Not yet recruitingPeriprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)
-
NCT07358455Not yet recruitingPeriprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)
-
NCT07299591Recruiting
-
NCT04367272UnknownOsteoarthritis, Knee | Infection | Periprosthetic Fracture Around Prosthetic Joint Implant
Clinical Trials on one-stage
-
NCT04376567TerminatedHemodialysis Access Failure | End Stage Renal Failure | Arterio-venous Fistula
-
NCT06763991Not yet recruitingMicrotia | Treatment Outcome | Outcome Assessment | Reconstruction | Surgery Related Complications Rate | RCT
-
NCT04209010CompletedBreast Cancer | Mammaplasty | Breast Carcinoma in Situ | Acellular Dermis
-
NCT02936024Recruiting
-
NCT06243276Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus | Dental Implant Surgical Techniques | Short Dental Implants
-
NCT02457299TerminatedEsophageal Cancer
-
NCT01015365CompletedInfection | Hip Joint Replacement
-
NCT02329509CompletedDevelopmental Disabilities | Cleft Palate | Cleft Lip | Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate | Restricted Language Development
-
NCT04458961CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee