Comparison Between the Role of Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound in Evaluation of Placental Invasion in Cases of Placenta Previa Anterior Wall With Previous Uterine Scar
Objective:
To compare between the role of Transabdominal ultrasound versus Transvaginal ultrasound in evaluation of placental invasion in cases of placenta previa anterior wall with previous uterine scar applying the unified ultrasonographic descriptors suggested by the European working group on abnormally invasive placenta "EW-AIP' Also to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of each criterion by comparing them with the final outcome of pregnancy Fifty pregnant women with persistent placenta previa (after 28 weeks' gestation) were prospectively enrolled into this study. Both transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound were performed by two different operators who were blinded to the results of each other.
the placenta was studied as regarding the exact loacalization and the unified descriptors were applied and evaluated by TAS and TVS.
The ultrasound findings were analyzed with reference to the final diagnosis made during Cesarean delivery and histopathological examination
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Definitive diagnosis of Abnormally Invasive Placenta was made at delivery when the myometrium was seen to be invaded by the placenta, and the pathological examination of the removed uterus showed the villi attached to the myometrium without intervening decidua (accreta), invading into the myometrium (increta) or reaching the serosa (percreta).
-Complete imaging using all diagnostic techniques (gray-scale, color Doppler) by both transabdominal and transvaginal by two expert operators, then an offline analysis of the acquired images & volumes was done Ultrasound examination was performed using a 2D ultrasound system equipped with a 4-8-MHz trans-abdominal transducer and a 12 MHz transvaginal transducer The transvaginal ultrasound was performed by a highly experienced operator whereas the transabdominal ultrasound was performed by a less experienced one and both were blinded from the results of each other Placenta was examined while the bladder was partially full about 300 ml for adequate visualization and precise localization
The Examined placenta is considered to be suspicious of abnormal invasion in case of having one or more of the unified descriptors described by the European working Group on Abnormally Invasive Placenta "EW-AIP":
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sherif Dahab, MD
- Email: dahoob@yahoo.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 12111
- Recruiting
- Kasr Alainy Medical School
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women in the reproductive age group (18 - 45) diagnosed persistent placenta previa anterior wall after 28 weeks of gestation , with history of previous Caesarian Section and/or any other type of uterine surgeries
Exclusion Criteria:
- Placenta previa posterior wall
- unscarred uterus
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Abnormal placental invasion
patients had placenta previa with histopathologically confirmed abnormal invasion with all three grades i.e. accreta, increta and percreta,
|
Lower segment CS with evaluation of Placental site, spontaneous separation, placental invasion into the bladder and other surrounding organs, Uterotonic administration, Bladder , ureteric or bowel injury, blood loss and blood transfusion
Other Names:
loss of clear zone, Abnormal placental lacunae, Bladder wall interruption, Myometrial thinning, Placental bulge, Focal exophytic mass
Other Names:
loss of clear zone, Abnormal placental lacunae, Bladder wall interruption, Myometrial thinning, Placental bulge, Focal exophytic mass
Other Names:
|
|
Normal placenta
patients had placenta previa with no abnormal invasion
|
Lower segment CS with evaluation of Placental site, spontaneous separation, placental invasion into the bladder and other surrounding organs, Uterotonic administration, Bladder , ureteric or bowel injury, blood loss and blood transfusion
Other Names:
loss of clear zone, Abnormal placental lacunae, Bladder wall interruption, Myometrial thinning, Placental bulge, Focal exophytic mass
Other Names:
loss of clear zone, Abnormal placental lacunae, Bladder wall interruption, Myometrial thinning, Placental bulge, Focal exophytic mass
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
abnormal placental invasion
Time Frame: At time of cesarean section
|
detection of abnormally invsive placenta at histopathological examination
|
At time of cesarean section
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 27
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Placenta Accreta
-
NCT07421180CompletedPlacenta Accreta Spectrum | Placenta Previa
-
NCT07236710Not yet recruitingPlacenta Accreta Management
-
NCT07519993Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07520201Not yet recruitingPlacenta Accreta Spectrum
-
NCT07406841Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06808165CompletedPlacenta Accreta Spectrum | Placenta Accreta / Percreta
-
NCT02606474UnknownPlacenta Accreta in Placenta Previa Anterior
-
NCT07452185Not yet recruitingPlacenta Accreta Spectrum | Placenta Accreta | Placenta Previa
-
NCT04314791CompletedPlacenta Accreta Spectrum
Clinical Trials on Cesarean section
-
NCT02760290CompletedPain | Hemorrhage | Ileus | Postpartum Fever
-
NCT03771976CompletedPregnancy Complications
-
NCT04766567CompletedCesarean Section Complications
-
NCT02257255Completed
-
NCT04856254CompletedPrevious Cesarean Section Scar
-
NCT02690077CompletedPatient Satisfaction | Earlier Family Bond Initiation | Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
-
NCT03041220WithdrawnCesarean Section
-
NCT05900492Active, not recruitingCesarean Section | Dehiscence