Performance Assessment of the PMD-200 Under General Anesthesia

April 15, 2019 updated by: Borzoo Farhang, University of Vermont

Performance Assessment of the PMD-200 in Subjects Requiring Surgery Under General Anesthesia

A novel measure of nociception is the nociception level (NoL) index. The NoL index ranges from 0 to 100 and is based on a combination of nociception-related physiologic variables, which estimates the nociceptive/antinociceptive state.

The purpose of this project is to conduct an observational study of the PMD-200 noninvasive monitor (Medasense Biometrics Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel), As this is an observational study, this monitor will not be used for clinical decision making, and the point of the study is to assess what happens with the NoL index during routine care. After thorough discussion with patients and written informed consent is provided in the pre-operative unit, patients will be transferred to the operating room. Patients will be connected to a vital sign monitor and any other medical equipment needed for the surgical procedure, as required by the standard of practice. The PMD-200 finger probe will be connected to the left hand middle finger (or right). The PMD-200 will be activated after the induction of general anesthesia. A calibration period of 1-2 minutes will be performed. At the conclusion of the surgical procedure, the PMD200 will be disconnected from the patient.

All the phases of anesthetic care are performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, but the time of administration of analgesics, muscle relaxants and other medications during anesthetic care will be recorded. The investigators will also record the time point of intubation (placement of breathing tube), extubation (removal of breathing tube), skin incision and any other significant surgical stimulation or noxious stimulation during the procedure. The investigators will be comparing NOL values prior to and following noxious stimuli, administration of analgesic agents and during non-noxious periods.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary efficacy objective of this study is to demonstrate that the NOL Index of the PMD-200 monitor (Medasense Biometrics Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel) is correlated with the responses to noxious stimuli and analgesic administration during the surgical procedure (prior and following a stimuli or titration), and the secondary efficacy objective of the study is to determine whether the NOL values can be correlated to other nociception predictors (e.g., increase in heart rate or blood pressure) following a noxious stimuli. The primary safety objective of this study is to assess the rate of any adverse reaction related to the study device. This device will not be used to make any clinical decision.

General anesthesia is the combination of various components including lack of movement, hypnosis, amnesia, control of autonomic responses, and attenuation of the response to noxious stimulation. Some anesthetic components, such as muscle relaxation and absence of movement are easy to assess with a twitch monitor. Similarly, hypnotic state can be estimated using processed electroencephalographic signals, but the anesthetic component that remains the most challenging to assess is the nociceptive/antinociceptive state. Typically, intraoperative nociception is estimated from autonomic responses (such as change in blood pressure and heart rate) and clinical signs such as tearing and sweating, but these variables can be very unreliable in predicting pain such as in patients who take beta blockers for treatment of high blood pressure whose heart rate may not increase in response to pain, patients with significant bleeding during surgery whose blood pressure may not increase in response to pain, etc. Effective antinociception is an important component of balanced anesthesia and appears to enhance postoperative outcomes. The most obvious potential consequence of insufficient intraoperative antinociceptive treatment is excessive postoperative pain, but inadequate treatment may also promote inflammatory, hormonal, and immunologic imbalances.

A novel measure of nociception is the nociception level (NoL) index. The NoL index ranges from 0 to 100 and is based on a nonlinear combination of nociception-related physiologic variables, specifically heart rate (HR), heart rate variability at the 0.15- to 0.4-Hz band power, photoplethysmograph wave amplitude (PPGA), skin conductance level, number of skin conductance fluctuations, and their time derivatives. The NoL index estimates the nociceptive/antinociceptive state from these components measures using random forest regression. Previous experimental work on a small number of patients showed that the NoL index is superior to each individual component and to a linear combination of the components. However, it remains unknown whether the NoL index accurately quantifies patients' intraoperative responses to noxious stimuli of varying intensities. The investigators therefore wish to evaluate the ability of the NoL index to discriminate noxious from nonnoxious stimuli, respond to analgesic administration, and progressively increase in response to increasing intensity of noxious stimulation.

In this observational study, The investigators attempt to learn the proper use of the PMD-200 and assess safety and efficacy of this device as mentioned above; however, no clinical decision will be based on the NoL index obtained.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
61

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
        • University of Vermont Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients ASA I-III scheduled for general anesthesia for laparoscopic GI or GU procedures.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years old.
  • Requiring laparoscopic gastrointestinal or laparoscopic hysterectomy under general anesthesia (without regional anesthesia)
  • Patient provides informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe cardiac arrhythmias within the last 12 months
  • Chronic pain conditions or analgesic usage (>1 month of large doses of opioids: more than 30mg oral equivalent of morphine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NoL Index
All patients will be monitored by PMD-200 device
Device: NoL Index
Use of the PMD-200 in an observational study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary efficacy objective: Correlation of NoL Index with noxious stimulation/analgesic use
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
To demonstrate that the NOL Index of the PMD-200 monitor (Medasense Biometrics Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel) is correlated with the responses to noxious stimuli and analgesic administration during the surgical procedure (prior and following a stimuli or titration). Specifically, the investigators will assess the % change from baseline-steady state NoL Index value with the NoL Index value during surgical stimulation (increased noxious stimulation) as well as the NoL Index value after administration of analgesics (decreased noxious stimulation).
Intraoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the secondary efficacy objective: Correlation of NoL Index with changes in heart rate
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
To determine whether the NOL values can be correlated to other nociception predictors (increase in heart rate) following a noxious stimuli.
Intraoperatively
the secondary efficacy objective: Correlation of NoL Index with blood pressure
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
To determine whether the NOL values can be correlated to other nociception predictors (increase in blood pressure) following a noxious stimuli.
Intraoperatively
Safety objective: Any adverse reaction related to device
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
To assess the rate of any adverse reaction related to the study device, any skin irritation or other unforeseen adverse reactions will be recorded.
Intraoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Vermont

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Borzoo Farhang, DO, University of Vermont

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 12, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18-0302

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on NoL Index

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings