Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI to Detect Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer (DIA-PANC)

September 19, 2021 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI for Liver Metastases of Pancreatic Cancer: Towards Adequate Staging and Follow-up of Pancreatic Cancer

Given the dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer, detecting liver metastases early can avoid inappropriate therapy with the associated substantial risks, long-term hospital admissions and high costs, but without survival benefit. The current standard of diagnostic workup with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) has a poor sensitivity (38-76%) for the detection of liver metastases. As more sophisticated and expensive treatment options emerge, better staging of pancreatic cancer is needed to avoid unnecessary procedures and select the most appropriate treatment strategy. New imaging modalities are available, but their value in staging of pancreatic cancer has not been evaluated yet. Therefore prospective imaging studies are necessary.

The main aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced diffusion-weighted MRI (CE-DW-MRI) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer compared to a reference standard of histopathology and follow up imaging.

The study is an international, multicenter prospective cohort study (inclusion of patients until 138 patients with liver metastases are included, with a total maximum of 465 patients). Patients with pancreatic cancer will undergo additional CE-DW-MRI within two weeks from the CECT. CECT and CE-DW-MRI will be read independently by two radiologists. Suspected liver lesions on CECT and/or CE-DW-MRI will be biopsied to obtain histopathology as reference standard. For liver lesions without histopathologic proof of metastases a paired follow-up CECT and CE-DW-MRI serve as a composite reference standard. Pancreatic resection will be pursued in patients without proven liver or distant metastases. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease will be offered palliative treatment. Follow up CECT and CE-DW-MRI will be performed in all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
465

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Athens, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Konstantopouleio general hospital
        • Contact:
          • Charikleia Triantopoulou, MD, PhD
  • Netherlands
      • Den Bosch, Netherlands, 5223 GZ
        • Recruiting
        • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
        • Contact:
          • Koop Bosscha, MD, PhD
      • Enschede, Netherlands, 7512KZ
        • Recruiting
        • Medisch Spectrum Twente
        • Contact:
          • Niels G Venneman, MD, PhD
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
        • Contact:
          • Koert de Jong, MD, PhD
    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
        • Contact:
          • Julie Earl, PhD
  • Switzerland
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Inselspital
        • Contact:
          • Adrian Huber, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older
  • clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer
  • written (signed and dated) informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous treatment for pancreatic cancer (e.g. chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, ablation therapy)
  • concomitant malignancies, except for adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Subjects with prior malignancies must be disease-free for at least 5 years
  • contra-indications to undergo CT (due to e.g. extreme claustrophobia, untreatable contrast allergy, renal function impairment)
  • contra-indications to undergo MRI (due to e.g. claustrophobia, untreatable contrast allergy, or not MRI compatible medical devices)
  • insufficient command of the Dutch language to be able to understand the patient information or fill in the questionnaires
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Patients with (suspected) PDAC

Patients with (suspected) pancreatic cancer will undergo additional Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI (CE-DW-MRI) within two weeks from the CECT.

Suspected liver lesions on CECT and/or CE-DW-MRI will be biopsied to obtain histopathology as reference standard. For liver lesions without histopathologic proof of metastases a paired follow-up CECT and CE-DW-MRI serve as a composite reference standard. Follow up CECT and CE-DW-MRI will be performed in all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Diagnostic test: Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI
An MRI scan enhanced with intravenous contrast and with diffusion imaging at several B-values

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of CE-DW-MRI
Time Frame: Baseline
Sensitivity and Specificity of CE-DW-MRI for the detection of liver metastases in patients with pancreatic cancer compared to CECT.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of metastasis on CE-DW-MRI in follow-up (3, 6 and 12 months after baseline)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Detection of metastasis with CE-DW-MRI, compared to CECT, in follow-up (3, 6 and 12 months after baseline) of patients with pancreatic cancer, after or during therapy
3, 6 and 12 months
Assess local resectability
Time Frame: Baseline
Sensitivity and specificity for CT and MRI to assess local resectability for all patients that underwent surgery
Baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
One year survival
Time Frame: Maximum 1 year
Survival rate after 1 year of follow-up
Maximum 1 year
Median survival
Time Frame: Maximum 1 year
Median survival time
Maximum 1 year
Disease free survival
Time Frame: Maximum 1 year
Time without (local) recurrence of cancer in patients that underwent resection
Maximum 1 year
Progression free survival
Time Frame: Maximum 1 year
Time without progression of cancer
Maximum 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Radboud University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Dutch Cancer Society

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: John J. Hermans, dr. ir., Radboudumc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Kees C.J.H.M. van Laarhoven, prof. dr., Radboudumc, Department of Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NL60473.091.17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Contrast-enhanced Diffusion-weighted MRI

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings