Comparing Articaine and Mepivacaine Without Palatal Injection in Pain Assessment During Maxillary Teeth Extraction

March 19, 2018 updated by: Abdul Kalam Azad, Melaka Manipal Medical College

Comparing the Effect of 4% Articaine and 2% Mepivacaine Without Palatal Injection in Pain Assessment During Maxillary Teeth Extraction- A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study compares the the efficacy of buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Mepivacaine without any palatal injection during extraction of maxillary teeth. One group of patient receives buccal infiltration of Articaine and another group receives buccal infiltration of Mepivacaine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Dense local anesthesia is required to reduce pain during extraction of tooth. Administration of local anesthesia to the palatal mucosa is proved to be the most painful due to its firm adherence to the underlying periosteum and also it's abundant nerve supply. Articaine has greater lipid solubility and high bone penetration property. Mepivacaine is proven to be the safest local anaesthetic agent. Avoidance of a palatal injection during extraction will benefit the patient by reducing pain and anxiety to a greater extent.

So this study compares the bone penetration property between Articaine and Mepivacaine by assessing the pain in the palatal mucosa while extracting the tooth using only buccal infiltration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Melaka, Malaysia, 75150
        • Melaka Manipal Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years and above
  • Patients requiring extraction of maxillary teeth which are grossly decayed, grade I mobile, root stumps or indicated for therapeutic extractions.
  • Healthy patients ( ASA I ) or patients with mild systemic disease with no functional limitations (ASA II).
  • Patients who are not allergic to the drugs used in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with periapical infections.
  • Patients who are on concurrent treatment with NSAIDs and corticosteroids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with epinephrine
Articaine Hydrochloride 4 % / Epinephrine 1:200,000 1.8 ML Cartridge
Other Names:
  • Septocaine 4%
Active Comparator: Group B
buccal infiltration of 2% Mepivacaine with epinephrine
Mepivacaine Hydrochloride 2% Epinephrine 1:200,000 2.2 Ml Cartridge
Other Names:
  • Scandonest 2%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of pain intensity
Time Frame: 10 minutes after the administration of the drug
pain intensity in the palatal mucosa is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during instrumentation to check objective symptoms of numbness. The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visual analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).
10 minutes after the administration of the drug
Measurement of pain intensity
Time Frame: through the extraction procedure
pain intensity in the palatal mucosa is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during flap elevation procedure . The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visual analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).
through the extraction procedure
Measurement of pain intensity
Time Frame: Through the extraction procedure
pain intensity is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during extraction of tooth. The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visul analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).
Through the extraction procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: Through the extraction procedure
the total number of patients with pain score more than 40 mm in visual Analogue Scale resulting in a palatal injection.
Through the extraction procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abdul k Azad, MDS, Melaka Manipal Medical College,Faculty of Dentistry, Manipal Academy of Higher Education

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MMMC/FOD/AR/B5/E C-2017(24)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with Epinephrine

Search Similar Trials