Comparing Articaine and Mepivacaine Without Palatal Injection in Pain Assessment During Maxillary Teeth Extraction
Comparing the Effect of 4% Articaine and 2% Mepivacaine Without Palatal Injection in Pain Assessment During Maxillary Teeth Extraction- A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Dense local anesthesia is required to reduce pain during extraction of tooth. Administration of local anesthesia to the palatal mucosa is proved to be the most painful due to its firm adherence to the underlying periosteum and also it's abundant nerve supply. Articaine has greater lipid solubility and high bone penetration property. Mepivacaine is proven to be the safest local anaesthetic agent. Avoidance of a palatal injection during extraction will benefit the patient by reducing pain and anxiety to a greater extent.
So this study compares the bone penetration property between Articaine and Mepivacaine by assessing the pain in the palatal mucosa while extracting the tooth using only buccal infiltration.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Melaka, Malaysia, 75150
- Melaka Manipal Medical College
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 years and above
- Patients requiring extraction of maxillary teeth which are grossly decayed, grade I mobile, root stumps or indicated for therapeutic extractions.
- Healthy patients ( ASA I ) or patients with mild systemic disease with no functional limitations (ASA II).
- Patients who are not allergic to the drugs used in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with periapical infections.
- Patients who are on concurrent treatment with NSAIDs and corticosteroids
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A
buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with epinephrine
|
Articaine Hydrochloride 4 % / Epinephrine 1:200,000 1.8 ML Cartridge
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B
buccal infiltration of 2% Mepivacaine with epinephrine
|
Mepivacaine Hydrochloride 2% Epinephrine 1:200,000 2.2 Ml Cartridge
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Measurement of pain intensity
Time Frame: 10 minutes after the administration of the drug
|
pain intensity in the palatal mucosa is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during instrumentation to check objective symptoms of numbness.
The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visual analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).
|
10 minutes after the administration of the drug
|
|
Measurement of pain intensity
Time Frame: through the extraction procedure
|
pain intensity in the palatal mucosa is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during flap elevation procedure .
The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visual analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).
|
through the extraction procedure
|
|
Measurement of pain intensity
Time Frame: Through the extraction procedure
|
pain intensity is measured using Visual Analogue Scale during extraction of tooth.
The pain is marked from 0-100 mm in a 100 mm visul analogue scale ( 0= no pain, 100= extremely severe pain).
|
Through the extraction procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Response rate
Time Frame: Through the extraction procedure
|
the total number of patients with pain score more than 40 mm in visual Analogue Scale resulting in a palatal injection.
|
Through the extraction procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Abdul k Azad, MDS, Melaka Manipal Medical College,Faculty of Dentistry, Manipal Academy of Higher Education
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Adrenergic Agonists
- Anesthetics, Local
- Bronchodilator Agents
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents
- Respiratory System Agents
- Adrenergic beta-Agonists
- Sympathomimetics
- Vasoconstrictor Agents
- Mydriatics
- Epinephrine
- Racepinephrine
- Epinephryl borate
- Mepivacaine
- Carticaine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MMMC/FOD/AR/B5/E C-2017(24)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
NCT07190807RecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg Pain
-
NCT07454083Not yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
NCT00866164Approved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
NCT04640896RecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial Pain
-
NCT03597737CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Oncology
-
NCT05187390RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATS
-
NCT00929188CompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, Splitting
-
NCT04280796CompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic
-
NCT03727373CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, Cancer
-
NCT01576978CompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
Clinical Trials on buccal infiltration of 4% Articaine with Epinephrine
-
NCT03130855Unknown
-
NCT02457325CompletedImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Adverse Reaction to Other Local Anesthetics
-
NCT07597408Active, not recruitingA Comparsion Between Articaine Hydrochloride and Buffered Lidocaine Hydrochloride
-
NCT07318311CompletedComparative Evaluation of the Effect of pH Adjustment of the Solution of Articaine With Epinephrine on the Efficacy of Jet Anesthesia
-
NCT06116994Not yet recruitingBehavior | Anxiety, Dental
-
NCT07342010Not yet recruitingAnesthesia, Local | Foot Surgery | Hand Surgery | Walant Surgery
-
NCT05221190Completed
-
NCT07231614Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07145879CompletedPain, Postoperative | Hemorrhage | Wound Heal | Local Analgesia Via Infiltration