Culprit Lesions in NSTEMI With Multi Vessel Disease (NSTEMI-CULPRIT) (NS-CULPRIT)

March 28, 2023 updated by: Thomas Engstrom, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Identification of Culprit Lesions in Non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

Acute myocardial infarction owes to a plaque rupture resulting in total (STEMI) or partial occlusion (NSTEMI) of the coronary artery. In patients with a partial occlusion and multi vessel disease (MVD), identification of the lesion responsible for the current event (culprit) at the time of the examination (coronary angiogram, CAG) can be difficult.

Meanwhile, identification of the culprit lesion is vital to conduct proper treatment. Furthermore, treating an artery with no plaque rupture (non-culprit), imposes a small risk for complications, which may be fatal. Precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD remains unsettled

The purpose of this study is proper and precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background

Acute myocardial infarction owes to a plaque rupture resulting in total (STEMI) or partial occlusion (NSTEMI) of the coronary artery. Current guidelines in NSTEMI recommend an invasive coronary angiogram (CAG) and possible treatment with percutaneous intervention (PCI) within 2-72 hours. In NSTEMI patients and multi vessel disease (MVD), identification of the lesion responsible for the current event (culprit) at the time of the examination can be difficult.

Meanwhile, identification of the culprit lesion is vital to conduct proper treatment in order to restore blood flow to the myocardium. Furthermore, treating an artery with no plaque rupture (non-culprit), imposes a small risk for complications, which may be fatal. In addition, since the symptoms relate to the culprit lesion it is currently unclear whether all stenosis or only the culprit should be treated by PCI. Today precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD remains unsettled.

Purpose

The overall objective of this study is proper and precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD.

Methods

The study employs cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), which allows detection of myocardium exposed to even brief periods of ischemia. Furthermore, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) which visualises the coronary artery lumen and wall. OCT allows for direct visualization of atherosclerotic plaques, presence of thrombus and atherosclerotic plaque ruptured that cannot be seen on a CAG alone.

Patients will have CMR performed prior to CAG. The PCI operator determines culprit based on CAG and ECG changes alone. OCT is subsequently performed on culprit lesion(s) and stenosis ≥ 50%.

Sample size calculation

Assuming the culprit lesion can be correctly identified with history/angiography/ECG in 95% of cases a positive predictive value >90% with 95% accuracy can be reached with 100 patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Eligible NSTEMI patients scheduled for CAG at one center

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years of age
  • NSTEMI (ECG changes and/or troponin/creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) rise) within 48 hours after symptom debut.
  • Multivessel disease at CAG: More than one vessel with >50% stenosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known intolerance of heparin or contrast medium.
  • Inability to understand information or to provide informed consent.
  • estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min.
  • Other reasons for troponin rise not applicable to acute myocardial infarction.
  • Atrial fibrillation at admission.
  • Patients with contraindication for CMR will only have OCT performed.
  • Potential pregnancy
  • Unstable patients requiring acute CAG and PCI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
CMR and OCT in NSTEMI patients with MVD
NSTEMI patients with multi vessel disease
Diagnostic test: CMR and OCT in NSTEMI patients with MVD
Lesions >50% stenosis i patients with NSTEMI are examined by OCT. All patients will have CMR performed prior to angiography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Is the PCI operator capable of identifying the culprit lesion based on ECG-changes and CAG? (CMR is the golden standard)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Correlation between operator identification of the culprit and CMR/OCT. The location of the culprit on CAG/ECG and OCT versus CMR will be evaluated by the chi2-test
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive predictive value of PCI operator identification of culprit lesion with CAG and ECG.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
cross-tables will be used to calculate the positive predictive value Receiver-operating-characteristics will be used to compare the additional diagnostic value of OCT compared to CAG/ECG.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Improvement in identification of culprit lesions evaluated by identification of an additional diagnostic value of OCT compared to CAG/ECG
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Receiver-operating-characteristics will be used to compare the additional diagnostic value of OCT compared to CAG/ECG. CMR is the golden standard.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Engstrøm, DMSCi, PhD, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-17023377

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI

Clinical Trials on CMR and OCT in NSTEMI patients with MVD

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings