Systematic and Mechanism-based Approach to Rational Treatment Trials of Blood Cancer (SMART)

November 30, 2021 updated by: Sascha Dietrich, German Cancer Research Center

Systematic and Mechanism-based Approach to Rational Treatment Trials of Blood Cancer (SMARTrial)

This observational study evaluates if drug response testing can be performed within 7 days and analyzes the value of ex-vivo drug screening for hematological malignancies as a biomarker to predict outcome, clinical course and response to treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Targeted treatments have revolutionized care of individual diseases. While a new generation of targeted drugs is emerging in leukemia and lymphoma it remains clinical reality that most genetic information is not used for therapeutic stratification. This is in part based on the shortcomings of traditional biomarker discovery within clinical trials, where throughput is limited in both, drug number and sample size. If it were possible to map the variable pathway dependencies and drug sensitivity patterns in individual patients it is likely to become an asset to identify genotype-phenotype associations, understand the underlying complexities of molecular networks and further precision medicine stratification.

To link clinical outcome and ex-vivo drug response assays, the investigators systematically measure pathway sensitivity and resistance of primary tumor cells ex-vivo using a diverse compound library for individual patients in need of treatment. By systematically analyzing ex-vivo drug response patterns, tumors should be functionally grouped, by response phenotype. While for the purpose of this study selection of a specific treatment will not be based on ex-vivo drug response assays, clinical response- and follow-up data of patients will be prospectively collected in parallel.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • University Hospital Heidelberg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with diagnosis of a hematological malignany with the need of treatment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of a hematological malignancy: patients with leukemia, myeloma or lymphoma (e.g. ALL, AML, CLL, T-PLL, MCL, MM) who are in need of treatment and are willing to donate sufficient tumor material for ex-vivo drug sensitivity testing.
  2. The treating physician needs to indicate treatment.
  3. Measurable disease burden according to criteria as mention in section 3.
  4. Treatment must be scheduled and the patient must be eligible for the planed treatment as judged by the treating physician.
  5. Availability of 5x10e7 cells from peripheral blood draws, bone marrow aspirations or lymph node biopsies.
  6. Patient's written informed consent present.
  7. Ability to understand the nature of the trial and the trial related procedures and to comply with them.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any condition, which precludes initiation of treatment (e.g. breast feeding, pregnancy, infections, etc.) as judged by the treating physician.
  2. Any coexisting medical or psychological condition that would preclude participation in the required study procedures, as judged by the treating physician.
  3. No systemic cancer treatment except for cytoreductive pretreatment within 1 week of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of completed drug sensitivity testing
Time Frame: 7 days
Patients' sample (blood, bonemarrow aspirate, tissue of lymphnode) will collected on day 0. Ex-vivo drug sensitivity testing will be performed.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of patients' drug response prediction by ex-vivo drug profiling
Time Frame: from date of inclusion until date of best treatment response (latest 12 months)
Ex-vivo drug sensitivity categorizes drugs as sensitive/not sensitive. Results will be compared with clinical outcome of patient (response vs. stable disease as defined in the clinical response definition by protocol
from date of inclusion until date of best treatment response (latest 12 months)
Prediction of time to next treatment
Time Frame: from date of inclusion until change of treatment (latest 12 months)
prediction of time to next treatment by a mathematical model based on ex-vivo drug response testing
from date of inclusion until change of treatment (latest 12 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
German Cancer Research Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Hospital Heidelberg

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sascha Dietrich, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg and DKFZ

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 16, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 30, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SMART

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematologic Diseases

Clinical Trials on ex-vivo drug response assay

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings