Non-invasive Monitoring of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (VBA) (VBA)

October 8, 2020 updated by: Tampere University Hospital

Non-invasive Peri- and Postoperative Monitoring of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

This study evaluates a novel noninvasive method to dynamically monitor the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and endovascular treatment of AAA (EVAR) on arterial pulse wave

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) develops slowly and degeneratively (increasing diameter, wall tension, thinning and decreased wall strength, altered compliance) which affects the aortic pressure and wave reflection. In 50% of cases, AAA rupture may lead to death and 50% of the remaining patients referred to hospital die. This results in high costs and preventable loss of lives. AAA can also be detected by pulse wave (PW) analysis. which could enable development of easy to use, affordable and accurate methodology for the detection of AAAs. The measurement system used in the present study is capable of wireless recording of PWs from several different locations utilizing two different sensor modalities (blood-volume related photoplethysmographic (PPG) PWs and dynamic blood pressure PWs). The objective is to study PWs in the detection of AAA and the effects of endovascular repair (EVAR) and whether adverse effects (i.e. endograft failure) can be detected. It is hypothesized that AAA and failure of the operation can be detected by PW features, especially by printed flexible sensors which will improve the usability, patient comfort and safety (hygiene). The technology could make it possible to screen AAAs at lower costs even in the municipal health centers or by the patients themselves, at similar accuracy, without skilled personnel operating the diagnostic devices and therefore improve the cost effectiveness of AAA screening resulting in significant savings, resource reallocation in the healthcare and also improved patient safety and prevention of deaths. It could also enable patient-centered, comfort follow-up for patients treated by EVAR.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Tampere, Finland, FI-33014
        • Recruiting
        • Tampere University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Niku KJ Oksala, Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Finnish, Caucasian

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has been clinically examined at policlinic of vascular surgery
  • The patient has been examined with computed tomography (CT) imaging
  • The patient has been considered a candidate for the EVAR of the AAA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A patient has a pacemaker
  • A medical doctor decides that the measurement disturbs or risks the subject's treatment process
  • Subject's denial (or withdrawal)
  • A patient has at least one amputated limb
  • The age of the test subject candidate is less than 18 years
  • A test subject candidate is not able to understand the study or is not legally competent
  • A test subject candidate has Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or Marfan syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulse wave change from baseline during EVAR measured by a force sensor
Time Frame: 2 hours
A force sensor node for dynamic pressure-PW measurements is utilized to detect pulse wave
2 hours
Pulse wave change from baseline during EVAR measured by a optical photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor
Time Frame: 2 hours
Optical photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor node is used for volume pulse measurements
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulse wave change from baseline after EVAR measured by a force sensor
Time Frame: 30 days
A force sensor node for dynamic pressure-PW measurements is utilized to detect pulse wave
30 days
Pulse wave change from baseline after EVAR measured by a optical photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor
Time Frame: 30 days
Optical photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor node is used for volume pulse measurements
30 days
Pulse wave change from baseline after EVAR measured by a force sensor
Time Frame: 12 months
A force sensor node for dynamic pressure-PW measurements is utilized to detect pulse wave
12 months
Pulse wave change from baseline after EVAR measured by a optical
Time Frame: 12 months
Optical photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor node is used for volume pulse measurements
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tampere University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Tampere University
Tampere University of Technology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 8, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R17129

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings