Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilation Bundle

May 18, 2020 updated by: Judith Wong Ju-Ming, KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Bundle vs. Standard Care; a Before-and-After Study

Mortality rates in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) are higher in Asia compared to other regions. In adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome, the only therapy that improves mortality rates is a lung protective ventilation strategy. The pediatric ventilation recommendations by the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) are extrapolated from evidence in adults, including ventilation with low tidal volume, low peak/plateau pressures and high end expiratory pressure. A recent retrospective study of ventilation practices in Asia including Singapore showed that a majority of patients with PARDS were being ventilated with high tidal volume, high peak pressure and low end expiratory pressure, not in compliance with PALICC recommendations. We postulate that currently used ventilation strategies could have contributed to the high PARDS mortality rates in Asia. We aim to determine if implementing a ventilation bundle comprising PALICC recommendations lowers PARDS and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality rates.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

We implement a PARDS ventilation bundle compliant with PALICC recommendations. The bundle contains a daily checklist for ventilation targets and reference tables listing targeted tidal volumes and end expiratory pressure-fraction of inspired oxygen titration. We will recruit mechanically ventilated patients who meet PARDS criteria. After a one-month implementation period, we will collect patient data over the subsequent 18 months, and compare them with the corresponding data in the 24 months prior to the implementation. The primary outcome is PARDS mortality, defined as number of deaths out of PARDS cases. Secondary outcomes are feasibility of ventilation bundle implementation, ventilator (VFD) and intensive care unit (IFD) free days and PICU mortality (number of deaths out of PICU admissions).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 229899
        • KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 21 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All children admitted to the PICU needing mechanical ventilation will be screened for eligibility. Those who fulfill the PALICC criteria for PARDS will be included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • fulfill criteria for PARDS
  • mechanically ventilated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • perinatal lung disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention
Patients will be ventilated according to the bundle; including ventilation targets, tidal volume, end expiratory pressure-fraction of inspired oxygen titration.
ventilation targets (pH, spO2, pCO2) tidal volume 3-6ml/kg peak pressures <28-32cmH2O PEEP-FiO2 titration tables
Control
Standard of care prior to implementation of the ventilation bundle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality
Time Frame: up to 60 days
death during PICU stay
up to 60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ventilator free days
Time Frame: up to 28 days
days alive and free from mechanical ventilation
up to 28 days
PICU free days
Time Frame: up to 28 days
days alive and discharged from PICU
up to 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 6, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 12, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 12, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/3076

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Ventilation bundle

Search Similar Trials