X-linked Hypophosphatemia and FGF21 (XLH 21)

October 26, 2020 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

X-linked Hypophosphatemia and Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolism: a Role for FGF21?

Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 and Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 are two endocrine Fibroblast Growth Factors, requiring Klotho as a co-factor to promote their systemic actions. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 is involved in the regulation of glucid and lipid metabolism. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 Knock Out mice display obesity and hyperglycemia.

In investigators experience, patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia often present with early-onset over-weight that could be partly explained by decreased physical activity because of bone pains and deformations after puberty; however, patients usually display progressive over-weight earlier in life, when there is no limitation of physical activity yet.

To the knowledge of investigators the association between Fibroblast Growth Factor 23, Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 and Klotho in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia has never been evaluated. Thus, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the glucid and lipid metabolism in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia, the main working hypothesis being that the genetic deregulation in the Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 axis in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemia induces modifications of Klotho levels (namely decreased levels) that in turn will deregulate the Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 axis (resistance to Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 because of decreased Klotho levels).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
39

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bron, France, 69677
        • Centre de Référence des Maladies Rénales Rares - Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares du Calcium et du Phosphate - Service de Néphrologie, Rhumatologie et Dermatologie Pédiatriques - Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
      • Paris, France, 94270
        • Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares du Calcium et du Phosphore, Service d'Endocrinologie Pédiatrique - Hôpital du Kremlin Bicêtre
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Endocrinologie, Maladies Osseuses, Gynécologie, Génétique, Hôpital des Enfants, CHU de Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 10 to 18 years followed in the different sites of the French Reference Center for Rare Diseases of Calcium and Phosphate, and monitored for hypophosphatemic rickets; estimated number to be included, N=40

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child with X-linked hypophosphatemia with PHEX gene mutation
  • Child between 10 and 18 years old
  • Child over 10 kg having a blood sample as part of the treatment (due to regulatory constraints for blood volume taken in 30-day period of 40 mL in children over 10 kg)
  • Child and parent / holder of parental authority who has been informed of the study and does not object to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnancy in progress

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Circulating FGF21
Time Frame: 1 day
Samples specific to the study will be collected during a sampling performed as part of the usual care and follow-up of the patient. An additional tube (5 ml maximum) will be collected, which will be sent to the Lyon Sud Hospital Center for analysis of circulating FGF21.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 69HCL18_0349
  • 2018-A01304-51 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on X-linked Hypophosphatemia

Clinical Trials on Descriptive study

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings