The Study of Psychological Status in Monophthalmic Patients With Ocular Surgery

July 26, 2018 updated by: Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University

A Prospective, Non-randomized, Controlled Study: To Evaluate the Psychological Status of Monophthalmic Patients Before and After Ocular Surgery

This study is designed to evaluate the change of psychological status before and after surgery in monophthalmic patients who receive the ocular surgery in eye with better vision.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Monophthalmos means the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the worse eye is less than 0.05 or the central visual field (CFOV) is less than 5°. The ocular surgery of the better eye in monophthalmic patients is of high risk. On the one hand the surgical failure will result in the patient falling into permanent darkness. On the other hand the monophthalmic patient may have the same disease in both two eyes such as high axial myopia, uveitis and glaucoma, which will increase the surgical risk. There is still no consensus on whether it is necessary to take risks to perform this kind of operation. In this study we will evaluate the change of psychological status before and after surgery in monophthalmic patients who receive the ocular surgery in eye with better vision. The necessity of the ocular surgery in monophthalmic patients will be evaluated from the point of social psychology.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Wensheng A Li
  • Phone Number: +8618650424985 +8618650424985
  • Email: drlws@qq.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients hospitalized in Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital and are intended to receive ocular surgery in one of two eyes.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intention to receive ocular surgery in one of two eyes.
  • Free from prior mental disorders.
  • Without general disease and can tolerate the operation.
  • Communication without difficulty.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With prior mental disorders.
  • Can not tolerate the operation.
  • Communication with difficulty.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
monophthalmic group
The BCVA of the worse eye is less than 0.05 or CFOV is less than 5°. The better eye need to receive ocular surgery.
Procedure: Ocular surgery
Different ocular surgeries (including vitreoretinal surgery, cataract surgery, anti-glaucoma surgery etc) will be performed in one eye of the patient. In monophthalmic patient group the surgery will be performed in eye with better visual acuity.
Normal group
The BCVA of the worse eye is more than 0.3 and CFOV is more than 10°. One of two eyes need to receive ocular surgery.
Procedure: Ocular surgery
Different ocular surgeries (including vitreoretinal surgery, cataract surgery, anti-glaucoma surgery etc) will be performed in one eye of the patient. In monophthalmic patient group the surgery will be performed in eye with better visual acuity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of anxiety
Time Frame: Change from Baseline HAMA score at 6 months.
Hamilton anxiety scale（HAMA）will be filled in by each patient and the final score will be recorded. The total score ranges from 0-56. A score less than 7 means no symptom of anxiety. A score between 7 to 14 means possible anxiety. A score between 14-21 means mild anxiety. A score between 21-29 means moderate anxiety. A score more than 29 means severe symptom of anxiety.
Change from Baseline HAMA score at 6 months.
Level of depression
Time Frame: Change from Baseline HAMD score at 6 months.
Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) will be filled in by each patient and the final score will be recorded. The total score ranges from 0-56. A score less than 8 means no symptom of depression. A score between 8 to 35 means mild or moderate depression. A score more than 35 means severe symptom of depression.
Change from Baseline HAMD score at 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of social support
Time Frame: Change from Baseline SSRS score at 6 months.
Social support rating scale (SSRS) will be filled in by each patient and the final score will be recorded.
Change from Baseline SSRS score at 6 months.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual function
Time Frame: One day before surgery and one day, one months, three months and six months after surgery.
BCVA and intraocular pressure (IOP) wlll be recorded.
One day before surgery and one day, one months, three months and six months after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Wensheng Li, Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SHIRB2018018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will be partly shared in published papers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings