Enhancing SUV Accuracy of PET/MR for Clinical Trial Qualification

October 28, 2021 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs), normalized activity concentration, measured using PET/MR have inaccuracies ≥ 20% which exceeds National Cancer Institute / American College of Radiology Imaging Network (NCI/ACRIN), Radiological Society of North America / Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (RSNA/QIBA) specifications and disqualifies PET/MR from multicenter or cooperative group clinical trials. High inaccuracy is primarily due to poor attenuation correction (AC) owing to lack of computed tomography (CT) data. This study will develop acquisition and analyses methods to synthesize CT images from MR data that can be used to achieve SUVs that are within 5% of those obtained using PET/CT (reference standard), thus meeting accuracy requirements needed to qualify for multicenter trials.

The overall goal of this research project is to validate clinically practical methods for producing MR-based attenuation correction information which is needed to produce quantitatively accurate PET images from a PET/MR scanner. Existing commercial PET/MR systems use methods that are inaccurate.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Objective The primary objective is to demonstrate that, using the new acquisition and analysis methods for MR-AC, PET SUVs in lesions and normal tissues can be measured using PET/MR and be within 5% agreement of those measured using PET/CT.

The secondary objective is to demonstrate visual and quantitative agreement between synthesized CT images generated from MR data and the reference, measured CT images.

Study Design This study would like to enroll patients receiving a clinically indicated PET/CT scan. The patients will be asked to agree to a receive research PET/MR scan within the study which requires additional time and potential MR risks for the patient. It does not entail extra injections or radiation exposure. Research acquisition and processing will be performed on the PET/MR data to create PET images that are expected to have quantitatively accurate SUVs. These will be compared to SUVs from the clinical PET/CT which will serve as the reference standard.

Outcome By bringing together cutting-edge advances in both MR acquisition and image analyses, the successful completion of these aims will achieve SUVs that are within 5% of those obtained with PET/CT (reference standard) with clinically appropriate acquisition time, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy, so that PET/MR systems meet SUV accuracy requirements needed to qualify for cooperative group clinical trials.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients receiving PET/CT at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (UHCMC) for a clinical indication

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving PET/CT at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (UHCMC) for a clinical indication
  • No Contraindications to undergo MR as assessed using University Hospitals (UH) Radiology standard MR assessment form
  • Has the ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent
  • The circumference of the volunteer in the body section, as determined using a measuring tape, to be scanned must be less than or equal to 110 cm to avoid field of view limitations on the PET/MR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient size or circumference greater than the MR gantry of the PET/MR.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Contraindications to undergo MR as assessed using UH Radiology standard MR assessment form.
  • Claustrophobia or inability to tolerate MR examination (lay still for approximately 1 hour and hold breath intermittently).
  • Individuals who are not willing or capable of giving informed consent or assent (with legal guardian consent).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PET/MR + PET/CT
The interventions for participating in this research are centered around steps needed to safely and ethically collect a research PET/MR scan following a standard-of-care PET/CT scan. The patient will be imaged in at least one of several standard anatomic areas: head/neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis or whole-body.
Diagnostic test: Positron Emission Test / Magnetic Resonance (PET/MR)
The Philips Ingenuity PET/MR is used for research scanning. Patients receiving a clinically indicated PET/CT, will be approached to be included in this study. There is no special preparation other than that needed for the prerequisite PET/CT scanning. At the completion of the PET/CT scanning, the subject will be taken to the PET/MR scanner, which is in close in proximity, for research scanning. The research scanning would take up to one hour or as tolerated.
Diagnostic test: Positron Emission Test / Computed Tomography (PET/CT)
Patients will receive PET / CT imaging for the detection of cancer or other clinically indicated anomalies. The completed study visit is expected to take approximately 2 hours and not longer than 3 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative agreement between measured CT and CT synthesized from MR data (Hounsfield Units)
Time Frame: Up to 3 hours after beginning scan
Demonstrate quantitative agreement between measured CT and CT synthesized from MR data
Up to 3 hours after beginning scan
Quantitative agreement in the derived linear attenuation coefficients at 511 kilo electro volts (keV).
Time Frame: Up to 3 hours after beginning scan
Demonstrate quantitative agreement in the derived linear attenuation coefficients at 511 keV.
Up to 3 hours after beginning scan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent difference in Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) in PET/CT scans compared to PET/MR scans
Time Frame: Up to 3 hours after beginning scan
Demonstrate that SUVs in lesions and normal tissues measured using MR-based attenuation correction (MR-AC) are within 5% of those measured using PET/CT.
Up to 3 hours after beginning scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Raymond F. Muzic, PhD, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CASE3Y18
  • R01CA196687 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR)

Clinical Trials on Positron Emission Test / Magnetic Resonance (PET/MR)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings