Does the Suture-spanning Augmentation of Single-row Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Reduce the Retear Rate?

Does the Arthroscopic Suture-spanning Augmentation of Single-row Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Reduce the Retear Rate?

There are several associated structural changes when dealing with massive rotator cuff repair, which include tendon retraction and fragility, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration, as well as osteoporosis over the tendon insertion. Those changes may lead to difficult in applying double-row repair, suture cutting through the tendon, too much tension over the repair and loosening or pull-out of anchors, which may results in poor tendon-bone healing and subsequent high re-tear rate. Therefore decreasing the tension over the repair site may increase the healing over tendon bone junction as well as decrease the risk of anchors loosening. A suture-spanning augmentation with two set of suture loops passing over musculotendinous junction medially and fixed with anchor at the lateral cortical wall may solve the problem. In order to define the clinical benefit of this adjuvant procedure, a prospective randomized control study is designed to compare the adjunctive reinforce suture with the single-row simple suture repair in massive rotator cuff tear.

Around sixty patients were randomized divided into two groups. The study group was used adjunctive reinforce suture repair technique, which was one lateral cortical anchor holding 2 separated set of transverse looping sutures over the medial musculotendinous junction in addition to single row repair, while the control group was used single row repair technique in simple stitch fashion. All patients will have clinical evaluation in pain (VAS score) and functional recovery (ASES and UCLA score) as well as MRI image for the tendon integrity.

If the suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair can yield an improved healing rate and fewer complications, massive rotator cuff tear should be repaired earlier in order to prevent the late development of irreparable tear.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Hsiao-Li

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the pre-operative image (MRI) showing the massive rotator cuff tear (fulfilling one of the following definition a tear with a diameter of 5 cm or more; a complete tear of two or more tendons; one with a coronal length and sagittal width greater than or equal to 2 cm)
  • patient was willing and able to provide scores for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • irreparable rotator cuff tear which was identified pre-operatively or intra-operatively
  • glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis
  • stage III or more of the fatty degenerative of supraspinatus in Goutallier classification
  • revision surgery
  • patients with bacteremia, a systemic infection, or an infection at the surgical site
  • patients who previously attempted or failed a treatment program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair
Active Comparator: single-row repair

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retear rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Using MR imaging to determine the presence or absence of rotator cuff retears
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 years
Record the VAS (pain level from 0-10) by the questionnaire, pre-op/post-op 2-year
2 years
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score
Time Frame: 2 years
Record the ASES score by the questionnaire, focus on joint pain, instability, and activities of daily living, pre-op/post-op 2year
2 years
University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA Shoulder Score)
Time Frame: 2 years
Record the UCLA shoulder score by the questionnaire, focusing on five sub-scales made up of: active forward elevation and strength (physician reported), pain, satisfaction, and function (patient reported), pre-op/post-op 2-year
2 years
Shoulder constant score
Time Frame: 2 years
Record the shoulder constant score by the questionnaire, focusing on ROM, functional assessment, strength measure, pre-op/post-op 2-year
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hsiao-Li Ma, MD, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 104-2314-B-075-082

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear

Clinical Trials on Suture-bridge augmentation of single-row repair

Search Similar Trials