Optimizing Patient Usability Experience for Chronic Care

August 20, 2018 updated by: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Laval University

Personalize Concerto: A Study Protocol for Optimizing Patient Usability Experience With an eHealth Platform for Embedded, Coordinated and Efficient Healthcare

The study aims to develop a module of an eHealth platform, do a feasibility study through a pilot cluster randomized control trial and assess the scalability of the solution.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Multimorbidity increases care needs and primary care use among people with chronic diseases (1). The Concerto Health Program (CHP) has been developed to optimize chronic disease management in primary care services. However, in its current version, the CHP primarily targets clinicians and does not aim to respond directly to the needs of patients and their informal caregivers for chronic disease management . This project aims to develop, implement and evaluate a user-centered, multifunctional and personalized eHealth platform (CONCERTO+) to promote a more active patient role in chronic disease management and decision-making through three phases.

For phase1: A first prototype will be developed by the design and technology teams, in close collaboration with researchers, health professionals and patient representatives who will identify the functionalities to include in the CONCERTO+ solution.

The Phase 2 of the project will consist in a feasibility study based on a pilot cluster randomized clinical trial (c-RCT) where patients with chronic diseases from a primary healthcare practice will receive CONCERTO+ and be compared to patients from a control practice receiving usual care.

For Phase 3, the analysis of CONCERTO+ potential for scaling-up will be done by documenting factors and conditions associated with the sustainability and scaling-up of the solution. To do so, the investigators will conduct: 1) two focus groups with patients and informal caregivers who participated in the study (one with the experimental group and one with the control group, each group gathering between eight and twelve participants); 2) semi-structured individual interviews with health professionals at the two study sites, as well as with health care managers, information officers, and representatives of the Ministry of Health and Social Services.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, G1V0A6
        • Université Laval

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having one or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia)
  • had 3 or more visits in the last 12 months
  • having an interest in health and technologies,
  • be able to read and speak in French

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Majors whose incapacity has been recognised judically

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Concerto+ (Intervention group)
Patients with two or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and who had three or more visits in the last 12 months will use Concerto+ application during 6 months.
Device: Concerto+
a user-centered, multifunctional and personalized eHealth platform
No Intervention: Usual care (Control group)
Patients with two or more targeted chronic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and who had three or more visits in the last 12 months will not use the application Concerto+ but receive usual care from FMG.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Activation
Time Frame: 6 months

The Patient Activation Measure -13 (2) is built on patient knowledge, skills and confidence that are directly targeted by the intervention and is associated to their activation level. Patients who are more activated have better health outcomes. Patients answer to a survey of 13 questions with the following scoring for each answer:

Strongly disagree = 1; Disagree = 2; Agree = 3; strongly agree = 4

The score of the activation level obtained (between 0 and 100) shows the degree of ability to manage their health with confidence according to the following scale ranges:

  1. Not believing that activation is important (≤ 47)
  2. Lack of knowledge or confidence to take action (47.1 - 55.1)
  3. Beginning to take action (55.2 - 67)
  4. Taking action (≥ 67.1).
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Process of care
Time Frame: 9 months
The effects of the use of Concerto + will be assessed and measured, using an adapted version of a survey from Glasgow et al. [3] and validated in the previous CHP (Concerto Health Program) assessment. Patients answer to a questionnaire six months after the use of Concerto+. 5 scales based on the key components of Concerto + are defined, and each scale include items: Solving-problems/Advices (4 items), Delivery System Design/Decision support (3 items), Goal Setting/Tailoring (5 items), Follow-up/coordination (5 items), Overall care (9 items). Items are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Almost never) to 5 (Almost always), through following subscales 2 (Generally not); 3 (Sometimes); 4 (Most of the time). Higher scores from the assessment survey have better effects in care outcomes.
9 months
Acceptability
Time Frame: 9 months

The acceptability of the device Concerto+ will be assessed by patient and informal caregiver, at the end of the intervention with:

  1. A short survey adapted from the Technology Acceptance Model [4] that includes 3 criteria (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, behavioral intention to use) with the following scoring: Strongly disagree = 1; Disagree = 2; Agree = 3; strongly agree = 4. Higher scores rates have a better acceptance of the use of Concerto+.
  2. The use of CONCERTO+ that will be measured by logs (Tests numbers, emergency visits, hospitalizations).
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Laval University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
International Business Machines (IBM)
Université de Montréal
Concerto Health Group Montréal, Qc, Canada
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
Haute Ecole de Santé Vaud (HESAV), Lausanne, Switzerland

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Ph.D, Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018-067/01-06-2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings