Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia

September 27, 2024 updated by: Sanjeev Kumar, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Non Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia: an Open Label Pilot Study Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Agitation and aggression impose a tremendous burden on the individuals living with dementia, their families, caregivers, and healthcare systems. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia (NPS) affect up to 80% of patients with Alzheimer's dementia. These symptoms impair patient and care giver's quality of life, increase the chances of hospitalization and also result in faster progression of the illness. The efficacy of current treatments is limited and the antipsychotic medications commonly used to treat these symptoms are associated with serious side effects. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that uses a very low intensity electric current to modulate cortical excitability and brain plasticity. tDCS can be safely administered to awake persons and is very well tolerated. In this study the investigators will use tDCS to treat agitation related to NPSD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Agitation and aggression impose a tremendous burden on the individuals living with dementia, their families, caregivers, and healthcare systems. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia (NPS) affect up to 80% of patients with Alzheimer's dementia. These symptoms include aggression and agitation, anxiety, depression, hallucinations, and delusions. These symptoms impair patient and care giver's quality of life, increase the chances of hospitalization and also result in faster progression of the illness. The efficacy of current treatments is limited and the antipsychotic medications commonly used to treat these symptoms are associated with serious side effects including cerebrovascular events, falls and increased risk of death. Electroconvulsive Therapy may be effective as well, however it requires anaesthesia and adversely affects cognition. Non-pharmacological or behavioral interventions are universally recognized as the first line treatment for agitation and NPSD. They are most effective when individualized and delivered in a person centered approach. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that uses a very low intensity electric current to modulate cortical excitability and brain plasticity. tDCS can be safely administered to awake persons and is very well tolerated. Studies in healthy individuals and patients with Alzheimer's disease have shown that tDCS applied to frontal brain regions can enhance cognitive function. Further, tDCS applied to frontal brain regions can improve depressive symptoms. The effects of tDCS on NPSD are not known. In this study the investigators will use tDCS to treat agitation related to NPSD.The objective of this proposal is to conduct an open label pilot study of tDCS for treatment of agitation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
13

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1H4
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A clinical diagnosis of Dementia of Alzheimer's, or Mixed type.
  2. Presence of agitation and/or aggression related to NPS as defined by: Agitation in cognitive disorders; International Psychogeriatric Association Provisional Consensus Clinical and Research Definition at the time of enrolment into the study.
  3. Patient or Substitute Decision Maker (SDM) able and willing to provide consent for enrolment in the study.
  4. Age 60 or above

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having dementia other than Alzheimer's or Vascular or Mixed type.
  2. DSM-5 Axis I diagnoses other than dementia that is thought to be significantly impacting the presentation such as bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or schizophrenia
  3. Imminent safety risk that would interfere with safe conduct of the study.
  4. Any contraindication to tDCS such as metal implants in cranium.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS):All enrolled study participants will receive 10 sessions (5 per week X 2 weeks) of tDCS in an open label study. Inhibitory stimulation will be delivered to the frontal lobes.
Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation that does not require general anaesthesia or surgical implantation of a device. It uses two AA size batteries to deliver direct current via rubber electrodes enclosed in saline soaked sponges.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of successful completion of the 2 week tDCS treatment course and rates of treatment associated adverse effects of tDCS in agitation due to NPSD
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This will be assessed by the successful completion of the intervention in at least 80% of participants without any treatment associated serious adverse effects
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects of a 2 week course of tDCS on agitation as assessed by Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI).
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Patients who undergo tDCS course will have reduced neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed using the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). tDCS will result in a significant reduction in agitation as assessed by CMAI -frequency total score between baseline and post treatment follow up two weeks later. CMAI-frequency score ranges between 29 to 203 and CMAI-disruptiveness ranges from 29 to 145 for each category. Higher scores indicate worsening of symptoms.
2 weeks, 4 weeks
Effects of a 2 week course of tDCS on agitation as assessed by Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Patients who undergo tDCS course will have reduced neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). tDCS will result in reduced burden of neuropsychiatric symptoms as assessed by Neuropsychiatric Inventory after the 2 week intervention. Each NPI domain is scored based on the interview conducted by the clinician. Frequency of symptoms are rated on a scale of 0 - 4 (Higher scores indicate symptoms occur more frequently). Severity / intensity of symptoms are rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms). Caregiver distress is rated on a scale of 0 to 5 (Higher scores indicate increased caregiver distress).
2 weeks, 4 weeks
Effects of a 2 week course of tDCS on agitation and other neuropsychiatric symptoms related to dementia as assessed by Clinical Global Impression (CGI).
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Patients who undergo tDCS course will have reduced neuropsychiatric symptoms as assessed using Clinical Global Impression -Improvement Scale CGI-I. tDCS will result in a significant improvement in clinical symptoms as assessed by CGI-I scale after the two week intervention. CGI-I scores range from 0-7, higher scores indicating worsening compared to at baseline.
2 weeks, 4 weeks
Effect of tDCS on caregiver burden in agitation due to NPSD as assessed by Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
tDCS will result in significant reduction in caregiver burden as assessed by Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Scores on the ZBI range from 0 to 88, score of 0-21 indicating little or no burden; 21-40 indicating mild to moderate burden; 41-60 indicating moderate to severe burden; and 61-88 indicating severe burden.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sanjeev Kumar, MD, FRCPC, CAMH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 099/2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings