Enhancing Reading Skills in 1st Grade Children

July 8, 2019 updated by: Sharon Gutman, Columbia University

Enhancing Reading Skills in 1st Grade Children Identified as Reading Below Grade Level

The purpose of the present study is to assess a reading intervention for first graders who are identified by their teachers as reading below grade level. The intervention addresses reading skills through a variety of techniques including games, play, movement exercises, music, and breaks to enhance literacy skills and reduce frustration commonly accompanying sight word recognition and phonemic decoding.

Over half of elementary school students in the United States are reading below grade level compared to their same age peers. Children with poor reading skills are more likely to experience academic and behavioral problems. When students are not reading at grade level by 4th grade, they are more likely to experience future academic failure, school dropout, juvenile delinquency, teenage pregnancy, and under- or unemployment in adulthood. Traditional methods of classroom large group instruction require children to sit quietly and concentrate on small print for extended periods of time. Many children experience frustration and agitation in response to such reading demands.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The National Assessment of Educational Progress estimates that only 35% of fourth graders in the United States are able to read at or above grade level. Children's future academic success is accurately predicted by performance in the first three years of school. A student is four times more likely to drop out of high school if he or she is not reading proficiently by the end of third grade. High school dropouts are three times more likely to be unemployed than college graduates per US Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2018, and those who are employed earn an average of 61% less over the course of their lifetimes compared to their college-educated peers per US Census Bureau in 2012. Eighty-five percent of juveniles facing trial in the court system are functionally illiterate per National Criminal Justice Reference Service in 2003, and adolescent girls with low literacy skills are five times more likely to become pregnant than teenagers who can read at or above grade level.

Despite the preponderance of data expounding a literacy crisis in the US, the status quo of reading instruction in US elementary schools has not been effective in remediating functional illiteracy. In classrooms averaging 21.6 students, teachers are unable to provide the individualized instruction that is necessary to meet the learning needs of at-risk students. Reading specialists who work with children one-on-one and in small groups employ methods similar to those of classroom teachers, requiring children to sit quietly and sustain their attention on small print. These demands are difficult for children experiencing challenges with self-regulation, and school environments requiring these behaviors for several hours each day may inculcate feelings of frustration and failure in the children who most need to develop a sense of self-efficacy as readers with full membership in the world of print. In this study, twenty-four first graders will be assigned by chance to a reading or no-reading group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10037
        • NYC Elementary Public School (recruitment location)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in a NYC elementary school in 1st grade
  • Between 6-7 years old
  • Identified by teachers as reading below 1st grade level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with severe behavioral problems making cooperation with intervention procedures difficult

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group (Reading Program)
First graders who will receive the 10-week reading program (a total of 20 hours), twice weekly in 1-hour sessions, and will continue to receive typical classroom reading instruction.
Intervention sessions will be carried out during the school day in a private school room. In each session, the investigator will work with the child individually to help him or her read better. Intervention will incorporate word recognition and phonetic decoding of words established as meeting 1st grade essential literacy standards. Learning techniques will involve games, play, movement, music, and breaks (i.e., the child is able to move about and associate words with color, video, and music. Three 5-minute breaks will be integrated into each 1-hour session to allow the child time to rest and process learned material). Intervention will also use each child's personal interests as a context around which sight words will be learned.
No Intervention: Control Group
First graders who will not take part in the reading program but will continue to receive typical classroom reading instruction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) Score
Time Frame: Post-intervention (10 weeks)
The TOWRE is a measure of reading fluency and accuracy for both children and adults. The instrument consists of two subtests: sight word efficiency (108 word items) and phonemic decoding efficiency (66 word items). The subtests can be scored separately or aggregately for a total score. Scores are calculated based on the number of total words read correctly in a 45 second period. Administration requires approximately 10 minutes.
Post-intervention (10 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Inventory of Reading Occupations (IRO) Score
Time Frame: Post-intervention (10 weeks)
The IRO is an 85-item assessment that measures a child's level of reading participation in 17 categories (storybooks, school books, school worksheets, chalk and white boards, posters, comic books, magazines, computers, e-readers, smart phones, television shows, game consoles, board games, labels, community signs and symbols, bulletin boards, and notebooks). Using a 5-item Likert scale, the 17 categories are measured with regard to (1) five separate reading dimensions (preference, mastery, frequency, contexts an environments, social support, and available resources), (2) three physical contexts (home, school, and community), and (3) five social contexts (reading with parents, other family members, friends, classmates, and teachers). Administration requires approximately 15 minutes.
Post-intervention (10 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sharon Gutman, MD, Professor of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAR8813

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Literacy

Clinical Trials on 10-week Reading Program

Search Similar Trials