Rifaximin-treatment of Collagenous Colitis (XiCoCo)

September 5, 2018 updated by: Bonderup, Ole K., M.D.

Rifaximin-treatment of Collagenous Colitis:

The hypothesis of this study is that an altered gut microbiota is a contributory factor in initiating an inflammatory process in the colonic mucosa leading to collagenous colitis. The investigators suggest that treatment with budesonide reduces the inflammation without treating the underlying cause. In this trial the investigators will try to modullate gut microbiota by adding rifaximin. The aim of this study is to assess if 4 weeks treatment with rifaximin as a supplement to a standard course of budesonide against active CC can reduce the risk of relapse after treatment cessation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with biopsy-verified CC and active disease defined by >3 bowel movements/day or >1 watery stool measured as a mean for a week. Patients will be invited to participate in the study independently of age and disease duration.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Ole K Bonderup, PhD
  • Phone Number: 004520212579
  • Email: olebonde@rm.dk

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Signed informed consent

    • Histological findings fulfill criteria for CC:

      • A subepithelial collagenous band >10 μm in colonic biopsies
      • Increased count of inflammatory cells in lamina propria
    • Diagnostic biopsies are a maximum of two years old
    • A history of nonbloody, watery diarrhea for more than two weeks prior to screening in patients with recently diagnosed CC or a history of clinical relapse for more than a week in patients with known CC
    • Active disease: > 3 stools/day or >1 watery stool/day measured as a mean during a week prior to baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Significant findings at colonoscopy that could cause diarrhea (colonic diverticulosis and polyps < 2 cm are not considered significant findings)
  • Biopsies more than two years old in a patient, who does not accept a new sigmoidoscopy
  • Untreated celiac disease
  • Positive stool cultures for pathogenic intestinal bacteria including Clostridium difficile
  • Suspected colitis induced by medication (diarrhea shortly after commencement of NSAID's, statins, SSRI or PPI)
  • Severe comorbidity (cardiovascular, renal, endocrine, neurologic, pulmonal or psychiatric) or history of cancer during the last 5 years
  • Abnormal liver biochemistry (ALAT or ALP > 2,5 x upper limit), cirrhosis or portal hypertension
  • Pregnancy or lactation (assured by negative P-hCG at inclusion)
  • History of significant intestinal resection
  • Treatment with 5-ASA, Salazopyrin, immunemudulators (Azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine or Methotrexate), biologic drugs (TNF-alfa-inhibitors), local or systemic glucocorticoids (except for Budesonide) within the last three month
  • Allergy or intolerance to Rifaximin (or similar antibiotics such as Rifampicin or Rifabutin)
  • Expectation of lack of cooperation or insufficient comprehension
  • Concomitant participation in an other clinical trial or participation within the last 30 days
  • Patients receiving Warfarin or Marcoumar (interaction with risk of uncontrolled INR-levels)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Rifaxamine 550 mg
Study drug Oral Rifaximin 550 mg TID for 4 weeks .
Drug: Rifaximin 550 MG
Oral Rifaximin 550 mg TID for 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Xifaxan
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo TID for 4 weeks
Drug: Rifaximin 550 MG
Oral Rifaximin 550 mg TID for 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Xifaxan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission
Time Frame: The number of patients in clinical remission 12 weeks after randomisation
The number of patients in clinical remission in the Rifaximin group compared to the placebo group.
The number of patients in clinical remission 12 weeks after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to relapse.
Time Frame: Last visit is one year after treatment cessation.
Time to relapse after cessation of treatment with Rifaxamin compared to placebo
Last visit is one year after treatment cessation.
Difference in Quality of life: short health scale (SHS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Difference in Quality of life assessed by a visual analog scale (SHS) after cessation of treatment with Rifaxamin compared to placebo. The scale extends from 0 to 10 with 0 as worst outcome and 10 as best outcome.
12 weeks after treatment
Microbioma
Time Frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Changes is gut microbiome after treatment
12 weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bonderup, Ole K., M.D.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sabine K Becker, MD, Clinic of Gastrointestinal- and Infectious Diseases, Diagnostic Center Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Falkevej 1-3, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BonderupO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 6 months of study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings