Heart Failure Events Reduction With Remote Monitoring and eHealth Support Investigator Initiated Trial (HERMeS)

October 25, 2022 updated by: Josep Comín, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of a telemedicine-based follow-up strategy compared with usual care in the management of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) at high risk of clinical events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The HERMeS Trial (Heart failure Events reduction with Remote Monitoring and eHealth Support) is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open label, observational investigator initiated study to assess the effect on cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal heart failure (HF) events of a telemedicine-based comprehensive management program for patients with chronic HF by means of remote daily telemonitoring of signs and symptoms of HF and remote structured follow-up using videoconference. The organizational characteristics of the programme and the impact in health outcomes resulting from its implementation have been previously published.

In this study we aim to compare the strategy of providing nurse-based structured follow-up to high-risk chronic HF patients through planned contacts between health care providers and patients and/or caregivers in the basis of face-to-face on-site encounters (usual care) or provide the planned care using telemedicine with the combination of remote daily monitoring of signs and symptoms of HF (telemonitoring) and delivery of structured nurse-based follow-up health care using videoconference (tele-intervention).

The main hypothesis of the study is that daily telemonitoring of clinical variables and symptoms in high-risk patients with HF allows early detection of decompensations by decreasing the number of fatal cardiovascular events or non-fatal HF events. As a secondary hypothesis we assume that tele-intervention using telemedicine may help to optimise neurohormonal treatment and deliver appropriate education to high-risk patients with HF; and delivery of care in high risk patients with HF through the combination of remote monitoring and tele-intervention may translate into a reduction of fatal and non fatal HF-related events.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
510

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Barcelona
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • University Hospital Bellvitge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients discharged from a heart failure hospitalization within 30 days of enrollment into the study or in the process of discharge planning.
  • Heart Failure diagnosis according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria.
  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed.
  • Patients receiving oral standard medication for chronic heart failure (CHF).
  • All patients will be eligible regardless the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age<18 years old.
  • Participation in another clinical trial.
  • Moderate or severe cognitive impairment without a competent caregiver.
  • Lack of social support.
  • Institutionalized patients.
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year (excluding HF).
  • Candidates for home-based or institutional end-of-life care.
  • Serious psychiatric illness.
  • Planned cardiac surgery.
  • Planned Heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant.
  • Patients in hemodialysis program.
  • Death before hospital discharge.
  • The patient is unable or unwilling to give the informed consent to participate.
  • The patient is considered not to be an adequate candidate for this study according to the decision of the local investigator.
  • Unstable patients with signs of fluid overload or low cardiac output.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Telemonitoring
Structured follow-up in the basis of using telemedicine. Telemedicine will include daily signs and symptoms telemonitoring and structured follow-up by the means of video or audio-conference.
Procedure: Telemonitoring

The system (the home tele-healthcare platform) designed jointly by engineers and clinical personal to be able daily automated selfreported symptom and weight, blood pressure and heart rate monitoring. The system allow weekly follow up through videoconferences.

Information from the telemonitoring system is automatically downloaded to a secure Internet site for review by clinicians and nurses daily.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients with usual care follow-up in a heart failure program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of cardiovascular death or non-fatal heart failure events.
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient
Occurrence of cardiovascular death or non-fatal heart failure events (time to first event) during a follow-up period of 6 months. Non-fatal heart failure event is defined as a new episode of worsening of symptoms and signs consistent with acute decompensated HF requiring intravenous decongestive therapy (e.g. diuretics) either on an outpatient basis (day-case HF hospital) or in the emergency department (<24 hours) or requiring unplanned hospital admission (>24 hours) or complicating the course of a non-cardiovascular admission.
Six months after inclusion of the patient

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readmission (all-cause, HF and cardiovascular) rate and total number.
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Days in hospital (all-cause, HF and cardiovascular).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Rate of emergency visits.
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Rate of non-fatal HF events.
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Mortality for any cause and cardiovascular mortality.
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Improvement of self-care using a validated scale (European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Improvement of quality of life using a validated questionnaire (EUROQOL - 5D).
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Patient satisfaction using a Likert-type scale.
Time Frame: Six months after inclusion of the patient.
Comparison of both strategies at the end of follow-up.
Six months after inclusion of the patient.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Josep Comín Colet, MD,PhD, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 25, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IDIBELL- 2017/PR190/17

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Telemonitoring

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings