Effect of Upper Extremity Aerobic Exercise Training on Exercise Capacity Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

October 20, 2020 updated by: Meral Boşnak Güçlü, Gazi University

Effects of Upper Extremity Aerobic Exercise Training on Exercise Capacity and Physical Activity Level in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Heart failure is a cardiac structural or functional disorder that, despite normal filling pressures, leads to inability to deliver enough oxygen to meet the metabolic needs o tissue. Heart failure is a serious chronic condition that affects a large proportion of the adult population in the world causing high mortality, leading to exercise intolerance and reduced health-related quality of life. Patients included in the cardiac rehabilitation program slow down disease progression, hospitalization decreases, quality of life improves and health expenditures decrease. Despite the frequent use of upper extremities in daily living activities, studies investigating the effect of upper extremity aerobic training on daily living activities, functional exercise capacity and other outcomes are limited. No studies have investigated the effect of upper extremity aerobic exercise training on physical activity level, functional and maximal exercise capacity and other measures in patients with heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It has been reported that exercise capacity in peak arm exercise is almost 30% lower in heart failure patients. For this reason intolerance to arm exercise is a significant problem in heart failure patients and may contribute to a decrease in performance in activities of daily living. Considering the fact that developments in these patients are caused by vasculature functional adaptation the extremity skeletal muscle and applied limbs, upper extremity exercises may be useful to reduce exercise intolerance during activities requiring continuous arm movement.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06500
        • Gazi University Faculty of Health Science Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
    • Yenimahalle
      • Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey, 06500
        • Gazi University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of chronic heart failure diagnosed at rest below 40% of the left ventricular ejection fraction and class 1-3 according to the New York Heart Association classification
  • Optimal medical treatment at least 30 days and clinically stable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unstable angina pectoris
  • Decompensated heart failure
  • Primary pulmonary hypertension
  • Complex ventricular arrhythmia
  • Contraindication to cardiopulmonary exercise testing
  • Patients who have had myocardial ischemia in the past 3 months
  • Ischemic cerebrovascular events
  • Second and third degree atrioventricular block
  • Thrombus detected in the left ventricle
  • Uncontrolled insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Acute infection
  • Aortic stenosis
  • Acute pulmonary embolism
  • Mental, musculoskeletal, neurological, or systemic illness that will prevent exercise.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: upper extremity aerobic group
The upper extremity aerobic exercise training with an arm ergometer will be performed in the treatment group so that training intensity will be between 60% and 80% of the maximum heart rate, dyspnea perception will be 3-4 according to Modified Borg Scale and fatigue perception will be 5-6 according to Modified Borg Scale, training duration will be 3 day per a week through 6-weeks.
Other: Upper extremity aerobic exercise

Range of maximal heart rate will be followed by a polar band during supervised session each week.

Aerobic exercise will be trained for 30 min-per/day, 3 days/week, 6 weeks. All sessions are being performed by a physiotherapist at cardiopulmonary rehabilitation department.
Sham Comparator: control group
Deep breathing exercises combination with arm movements will be given as a home program in the control group. Training duration will be 3 day per a week through 6-weeks.
Other: Control Group
Deep breathing exercises combinated with arm movements

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal exercise capacity
Time Frame: Second day
It will be evaluated using symptom limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The cardiopulmonary exercise test will be performed at a progressively increasing speed and grade
Second day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary function
Time Frame: First day
Dynamic lung volume measurements will be performed using a spirometry according to the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society criteria.
First day
Respiratory muscle strength
Time Frame: First day
Maximal inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength will be evaluated a using mouth pressure device.
First day
Pulmonary muscle endurance
Time Frame: First day
It will be evaluated incremental threshold loading test, in which participants started an initial load of 30% of maximal inspiratory pressure with a 10% increment every 2 minutes.
First day
Peripheral muscle strength
Time Frame: First day
It will be evaluated using a portable hand held Dynamometer.
First day
Grip strength
Time Frame: First day
It will be evaluated using a grip dynamometer.
First day
Functional impairment due to dyspnea
Time Frame: First day
It will be evaluated with modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MMRC). MMRC is a baseline assessment of functional impairment attributable to dyspnea from respiratory disease. modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale, which consist of five-item scale based on a variety of physical activities that cause a feeling of dyspnea, was used to determine the severity of patients' shortness of breath. The participants read and chose the most appropriate scale option between 0 and 4 that best describes the degree of their pulmonary distress.
First day
Physical activity level
Time Frame: First day
Physical activity will be evaluated multi sensor activity monitor for 4 consecutive days.
First day
Functional exercise capacity
Time Frame: First day
Six minute pegboard and ring test (6-PBRT) was applied to assess the functional capacity of the upper limbs. Subjects are asked to move as many rings as possible in 6 minutes, and the score is the number of rings moved during the 6-minute period.
First day
Activity daily of living
Time Frame: Second day
London Chest Activity Daily of Living Scale is a 15-item scale divided into 4 domains: self-care (4 items), domestic (6 items), physical (2 items), and leisure (3 items).The total score is calculated by summing the domains and ranges from 0 to 75, with higher values indicating more marked limitation in activity daily of living performance.
Second day
Quality of sleep
Time Frame: Second day
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Turkish version) (PSQI) is a self-reported questionnaire. PSQI evaluates patients' sleep quality. The scale includes 24 questions overall, with 19 questions answered by the person him/ herself and the remaining 5 answered by his/her bed partner or roommate. The first 19 self-answered questions evaluate 7 subscales, subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, duration of sleep, routine sleep activity, sleep disorders, the use of drugs for sleeping, and daytime dysfunction. Each item in the scale is scored between 0 and 3 (no difficulty to severe difficulty). The sum of the 7 subscale scores gives the overall PSQI score. Lower scores show better sleep quality.
Second day
Fatigue
Time Frame: Second day
Fatigue Severity Scale (Turkish version) - Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a self-reported questionnaire. FSS evaluates patient's fatigue severity. This questionnaire includes 9 items and score range for each item from 1 to 7 point (7-point Likert scale). Fatigue Severity Scale score is calculates by deriving an arithmetic mean. Cut-scores of over 4 are indicative of significant fatigue (higher scores show more severe fatigue).
Second day
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Second day
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (Turkish version). The test used to determine the risk group of patients in terms of anxiety and depression and consists of 14 questions. Lowest score that patients can get from both subscales is 0, the highest score 21. The cut-off points for the Turkish version of the HAD scale were 10 for the anxiety subscale (HAD-A) and 7 for the depression subscale (HAD-D).
Second day
Quality of life scale
Time Frame: Second day
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) (Turkish version of scale) 21 items rated on six-point Likert scales, representing different degrees of impact of heart failure on Heart Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL), as well as scores for two dimensions, physical (8 items, range 0-40) and emotional (5 items, range 0-25).
Second day
Dyspnea
Time Frame: Second day
It will be evaluated modified Borg Scale. This modified 12-point scale consists (0, 0.5, 1-10) corresponds with increasing shortness of breath. Patients were asked to mark the most appropriate description or number of their shortness of breath at rest and during exercise.
Second day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Gazi University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Meral BOŞNAK GÜÇLÜ, PhD, Gazi University
  • Study Chair: Hanım Eda GÖKTAŞ, MSc, Gazi University
  • Principal Investigator: Adnan ABACI, PhD, Gazi University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 20, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Gazi University 14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings