Biomarker Predictors of Memantine Sensitivity in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

April 3, 2026 updated by: Neal R. Swerdlow, M.D., Ph.D., University of California, San Diego
The effects of the medication, memantine, on brain functions and the symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease will be tested

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Memantine (MEM) is an FDA-approved treatment for Alzheimer's Disease (AD), but its clinical effects vary from person-to-person. We have reported that a "test dose" of MEM significantly enhances early auditory information processing (EAIP) indices of brain function in both healthy adults and psychiatric patients, suggesting that these EAIP measures can be used as "biomarker" evidence that - in a given person - MEM is active within brain circuitry relevant to cognition. This study tests the hypothesis that the EAIP response to a "test dose" of MEM can be used to predict which patients with AD will be most vs. least sensitive to the clinical benefits of this medication over a 24-week trial.

Subjects with mild-to-moderate severity AD who meet criteria for study entry come to UCSD where consenting and a comprehensive screening and diagnostic assessment including a physical exam, EKG, and neuropsychological assessment are conducted. In addition, subjects are assessed on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog), which is the primary clinical outcome measure, and behavioral symptoms documented by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Q) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), which are secondary assessment measures. Blood is collected in order to assess APOE genotype (rs7412, rs429358) and characterize MEM-sensitive vs. -insensitive patients.

After initial screening, subjects return twice, approximately 7 days apart, for biomarker assessment after challenge with placebo (PBO) or memantine 20 mg po (MEM) in a double-blind, randomized order cross-over design. Subjects are assessed on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle (PPI), mismatch negativity (MMN) and auditory steady state response (ASSR) as well as AD-relevant cognitive measures via the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).

Subjects then enter the "treatment phase." MEM is initiated at 5 mg/d and titrated with 5 mg weekly increments. During this time, subjects / caregivers are contacted weekly by study staff to assess adherence. Intervention Week 1 will begin when dosing reaches the full dose of 10 mg bid.

Subjects are reassessed on the primary (ADAS-cog) and secondary (NPI-Q and GDS) outcome measures after 8, 16 and 24 weeks of treatment at the full dose. Subjects are then offered the opportunity to remain at this dose of MEM, or to taper off MEM, under the care of their primary provider.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • Clinical Teaching Facility (CTF-B102) at UCSD Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion:

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Research Center-confirmed diagnosis of AD
  2. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 10-22 OR a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score of 15-24
  3. Age 50-83 y
  4. Knowledgeable caregiver
  5. Ambulatory
  6. Medically stable;
  7. Audiometric testing (detection < or = to 45 db(A) at 1000 Hz)
  8. Informed consent

Exclusion:

  1. Active systemic illness (e.g. heart disease, liver failure, renal insufficiency, cancer, HIV, tuberculosis, Hepatitis C)
  2. Current psychiatric or neurologic illness other than AD
  3. History of vascular disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, transient ischemic attack, seizure, head injury with loss of consciousness; substance dependence (including alcohol and Opioid)
  4. Past treatment with memantine; unable to tolerate acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
  5. Investigational drug treatment < 30 d of screening
  6. Current meds: amantadine, riluzole, other pro-cognitive medication, opioids
  7. Positive urine toxicology for non-prescribed psychoactive substance
  8. Actively enrolled in cognitive remediation therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Memantine
EAIP are assessed 210 (PPI) and 345 min (MMN, ASSR) after administration of placebo or memantine (MEM 20 mg po), in a randomized order double-blind design. In this arm subjects are administered MEM 20 mg. Pills look identical so both the subject and research staff are blind to condition.
Drug: Memantine
Phase 1 will test the acute effects of memantine (20 mg po) vs. placebo (PBO) on early auditory information processing measures in 32 carefully characterized patients with mild-to-moderate severity AD who are not currently taking AD medications. From this "challenge" test, a set of "early auditory information processing memantine sensitivity" measures will be derived for each patient. In Phase 2, all patients will begin an open-label trial of memantine, titrated to 10 mg bid, with outcome measures collected after 8, 16 and 24 weeks of treatment. Medication adjustments are not restricted, and response heterogeneity is anticipated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Measure in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) at 8, 16 and 24 Weeks
Time Frame: 0, 8, 16, 24 weeks
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is a tool used to assess the severity of cognitive impairment in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. It includes 11 tasks that evaluate memory, language, and praxis. The total score can range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating more severe impairment.
0, 8, 16, 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Measure in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) at 8, 16 and 24 Weeks
Time Frame: 0, 8, 16, 24 weeks
The NPI-Q measures behavioral symptoms in and is a self-administered questionnaire completed by informants about patients for whom they care. Each of the 12 NPI-Q domains contains a survey question that reflects cardinal symptoms of that domain. Symptoms are rated as present or absent, and if they are present the informant rates the severity of the symptom on a 3-point scale from mild to severe. The sum of severity scores across all 12 items ranges from 0 to 36 with higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms.
0, 8, 16, 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Measure in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) at 8, 16 and 24 Weeks
Time Frame: 0, 8, 16, 24 weeks
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a self-report measure of depression in older adults using a "Yes/No" format. The GDS consists of 30 items with higher scores indicating greater levels or depression. A score of 0-9 is normal, 10-19 is mild depression, and 20-30 is severe depression.
0, 8, 16, 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Diego

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Neal Swerdlow, M.D., Ph.D., UCSD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 8, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01AG059640-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Memantine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings