CompRehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Patients With Scleroderma-Associated ILD and PH (CRUSADE)

February 18, 2025 updated by: Franz Rischard, DO

CompRehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Patients With Scleroderma-Associated Interstitial Lung DiseasE and Pulmonary Hypertension (PH): The CRuSADE PH Study

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and scleroderma who develop pulmonary hypertension (PH) do not fit well into the current classification system and treatments for pulmonary hypertension. This study aims to better understand patients with ILD-PH and scleroderma and to determine if treatment with Macitentan is beneficial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to use pressure-volume loop derived right ventriculo-vascular coupling, pulmonary impedance, and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to:

  1. Comprehensively phenotype patients with scleroderma ILD-PH and pulmonary vascular exercise limitation (PVL) relative to scleroderma ILD-PH without PVL.
  2. Compare the efficacy of chronic Macitentan therapy in improving 1) right ventricular hemodynamics 2) exercise capacity and 3) symptoms in scleroderma ILD-PH patients with and without PVL.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • University of Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have scleroderma ILD will be defined as having a total lung capacity of less than 80% predicted and CT evidence of fibrosis. The degree of fibrosis will be scored by a radiologist using the CT comparative scoring method of Wells et al (13).
  • Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) as defined as resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg with a wedge pressure of ≤ 15 mmHg during right heart catheterization.
  • Stable ILD as evident by a stable FEV1 and FVC for 3 months prior to the initiation of the study, and be pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted treatment naïve.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% or clinical, echocardiographic, and/or catheterization data consistent with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and/or moderate-severe aortic or mitral valve abnormality
  • Patients with severe restrictive lung disease (FVC<40% predicted) and/or obstructive lung disease (FEV1 <55% predicted and FEV1/FVC <70%).
  • Patients with radiographic combined pulmonary fibrosis/emphysema (CPFE) will also be excluded if imaging shows predominant emphysema and/or obstruction is moderately severe (FEV1<30%)
  • Patients with a history of pulmonary embolism within the last three months or evidence of chronic pulmonary embolism.
  • Patients with a known contraindication to right heart catheterization.
  • Patients whom have received active or previous pulmonary vasoactive medication within the previous 12 weeks.
  • Patients with a contraindication to exercise testing based on American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines.
  • PAH associated with significant venous or capillary involvement (PCWP > 15 mmHg), known pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis.
  • Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.
  • Pulmonary Hypertension belonging to groups 2 to 5 of the Venice classification.
  • Moderate to severe hepatic impairment, i.e., Child-Pugh Class B or C.
  • Estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min
  • Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Hemoglobin < 75% of the lower limit of the normal range.
  • Systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg.
  • Acute or chronic physical impairment (other than dyspnea), limiting the ability to comply with study requirements.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • Known concomitant life-threatening disease with a life expectancy < 12 months.
  • Body weight < 40 kg.
  • Any condition that prevents compliance with the protocol or adherence to therapy.
  • Treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) within 3 months prior to randomization.
  • Systemic treatment within 4 week prior to randomization with cyclosporine A or tacrolimus, everolimus, sirolimus (calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors).
  • Treatment with cytochrome P3A (CYP3A) inducers within 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Known hypersensitivity to drugs of the same class as the study drug, or any of their excipients.
  • Planned treatment, or treatment, with another investigational drug within 1 month prior to randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Opsumit
Opsumit 10 mg tablet by mouth once daily
Drug: Opsumit 10 Mg Tablet
Oral tablet taken once daily
Other Names:
  • Macitentan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in exercise pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in right ventricular pulmonary vascular hemodynamic coupling (RVPA).
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months
Change in maximal oxygen consumption (V02 max).
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months
Change in pulmonary impedance.
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Franz Rischard, DO

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Pittsburgh
National Jewish Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Franz P. Rischard, DO, University of Arizona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IIS-02801

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings