Evaluation of Self-filling Osmotic Tissue Expander in Augmenting Keratinized Tissue Around Dentulous Region

February 27, 2019 updated by: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

Clinical and Optical Evaluation of Self-filling Osmotic Tissue Expander in Augmenting Keratinized Tissue Around Dentulous Region

The present study is a human, prospective, single centre, single blind randomised controlled clinical tria conducted to explore the feasibility and efficacy of self-inflating hydrogel expander (Osmed®) to gain keratinised tissue around the dentulous area. The trial is in accordance to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Ten healthy individuals satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study. A detailed, thorough medical and dental history was obtained and each patient was subjected to comprehensive clinical and radiological examination. All patients were informed about the nature of the study, surgical procedure involved, potential benefits and risks associated with the surgical procedure and a written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

All the patients were implanted with self-inflating hydrogel expander (Osmed®) in subperiosteal positions using the pouch technique in the mandibular anterior region. The clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, two weeks post expander retrieval, three months and six months post-operatively.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients willing to participate in the study
  • Patients above 18 years of age
  • Systemically healthy patients
  • Patients exhibiting keratinized tissue width < 2 mm
  • Patients manifesting Miller's Class I or Class II recession
  • Patients who demonstrate good plaque control ( PI < 10% ) and showing good compliance
  • Uncompromised adjacent teeth with healthy gingival conditions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated periodontal disease, caries
  • Insufficient oral hygiene
  • Thin biotype ( < 0.8 mm )
  • Use of tobacco
  • Previous radiation therapy
  • Patients with known systemic diseases and conditions as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or haemorrhagic disorders
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Non-compliant patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Osmed® hydrogel expander implantation
Implantation of Osmed® hydrogel expander was done in subperiosteal positions using the pouch technique in the mandibular anterior region.
Device: Osmed® hydrogel expander implantation
Under local anaesthesia, a small vertical incision, adapted to the diameter of the Osmed® sself-inflating hydrogel expander, was made with #15 scalpel blade at the mesial line angle of the adjacent tooth which started below the gingival margin extending from the keratinized tissue above the MGJ to the non-keratinized tissue beyond the MGJ. A minimally invasive preparation of a subperiosteal pouch was performed with KPA tunnelling knife. Size of the pouch was controlled with the specific surgical template to ensure the device easily fits into the prepared pouch without tension. Expanders were secured in the correct position with a bone fixation screw, at the flat end, which does not possess an expansion capability. The wound was closed with 3-0 silk suture using simple interrupted sutures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Keratinized tissue width (KTW)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured from the most apical gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ), with the MGJ location determined using the visual method (Schiller's potassium iodide solution).
6 months
Keratinized tissue thickness (KTT)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured at the mid-buccal aspect of the study tooth just below the marginal gingiva using an endodontic file.
6 months
Optical scanning for analysis of tissue thickness
Time Frame: 6 months
alginate impressions were made at the baseline prior to expander placement, immediately after the removal of expander and 6 months post-augmentation. The prepared casts were assessed for soft tissue changes by optical scan using 3D camera (Intellidenta AG, Basel, Switzerland). The obtained digital images of the casts reflecting the different treatment time were then superimposed and matched in one common coordinate system. The buccal surfaces of the study teeth were used as a reference point for the superimposition of different images. Subsequently, a defined area of interest at each site were measured and the difference in the linear distance between the time points were calculated.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival recession depth (GRD)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured at the mid-buccal aspect of the study tooth from the CEJ to the most apical extension of gingival margin (using UNC-15 probe)
6 months
Vestibular depth (VD)
Time Frame: 6 months
measured from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the deepest part of vestibular mucosa. Measurements were taken with the UNC-15 probe while exerting a firm facial pull on the lip or cheek at a 90° angle to the surface of the teeth.
6 months
Color and texture match to the surrounding tissue
Time Frame: 6 months
binary ratings of "equal or not equal to surrounding native tissue" assigned upon clinical examination
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Dr. Prabhuji MLV, MDS, Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 5, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 02_D012_71909

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Augmentation

Clinical Trials on Osmed® hydrogel expander implantation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings