- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04367766
Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area (IIP/ARP/SH)
Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area: Alveolar Ridge Preservation vs Immediate Implant Placement vs Delayed Implant Placement
After atraumatic tooth extraction and the assessment of the feasibility of immediate implant placement, patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment concepts:
- Immediate Implant Placement and Immediate Provisionalization
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation. After 4 months of healing an implant will be placed with simultaneous GBR and/or Soft Tissue Augmentation procedures, if needed.
- Spontaneous Healing of the socket. After 4 months of healing, an implant will be placedwith simultaneous GBR and/or Soft Tissue Augmentation procedures, if needed.
In all groups, four months after implant placement, a prosthesis will be delivered. From this experimental period onward, patients will be scheduled for maintenance. Clinical, radiographic and volumetric assessment will be performed by clinicians not involved in the surgery and blind with respect to treatment assignment at 1, 3 and 5 years post loading.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The overall objective of this study will be to compare the three treatment modalities after tooth extraction (immediate implant placement, alveolar ridge preservation, spontaneous healing) in terms of:
- patient-related (morbidity) outcomes during surgical procedure and the first 2 weeks after the surgical procedure
- cost-effectiveness ratio (treatment time, number of surgeries, number of appointments and overall appointments time, need for bone and soft tissue augmentation, overall costs) at the time of prosthesis delivery
- volumetric bone and soft tissue changes of the site before treatment (prior to tooth extraction), 4 months after tooth extraction, 1, 3 and 5 years after final prosthesis.
- clinical, radiographic, aesthetic and patient-related (satisfaction) outcomes at the time of prosthesis delivery and 1, 3 and 5 years after final prosthesis.
- Implant Success and Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years after final prosthesis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Marco Clementini, DDS, PhD
- Phone Number: 00393388378866
- Email: mclementini@me.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Roma, Italy
- Recruiting
- Centro Specialistico Odontoiatrico (CSO)
-
Contact:
- Marco Clementini, DDS, PhD
- Email: mclementini@me.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- single tooth extraction in the anterior region of the dentition (including premolars) to be extracted
- smoking no more than 10 cigarettes/day,
- periodontal health (BoP < 10%) and good plaque control (< 20%)
- absence of symptomatic periapical radiolucencies, acute abscesses at the site of extraction,
- extraction sites with less than 30% loss of one or more walls
- adequate quantity and quality of native bone to achieve primary stability
Exclusion Criteria:
- growing patients
- patients with autoimmune disease, uncontrolled diabetes or immunocompromised
- history of head and neck radiation for cancer treatment,
- pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Immediate Implant Placement
prosthetically driven immediate implant placement (TLC implant, Straumann) with bone substitute (BioOss Collagen, Geistlich) filling the gap between the buccal socket wall and the implant surface and a collagen matrix (Fibrogide, Geistlich) positioning at the vestibular aspect to increase soft tissue volume, with immediate (non occlusal loading) prosthetic provisionalization.
|
Insertion of an osseointegrated implant into the bone of anterior maxilla/mandible, following the right prosthetic plan
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) + Delayed Implant Placement:
ARP performed with bone substitute (BioOss Collagen, Geistlich) and a collagen matrix placed to seal the socket entrance (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich).
After 4 months of healing a prosthetically driven implant (TLC implant, Straumann) will be placed with adjunctive GBR procedure with bone substitute (BioOss Collagen, Geistlich) and a collagen membrane (BioGide, Geistlich) if buccal bone will be < 2 mm and soft tissue augmentation with a collagen matrix (Fibrogide, Geistlich) if soft tissue thickness will be < 2mm
|
Insertion of an osseointegrated implant into the bone of anterior maxilla/mandible, following the right prosthetic plan
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Spontaneous Healing + Delayed Implant Placement
extraction socket will be left to heal spontaneously.
After 4 months of healing a prosthetically driven implant (TLC implant, Straumann) will be placed with adjunctive GBR procedure with bone substitute (BioOss Collagen, Geistlich) and a collagen membrane (BioGide, Geistlich) if buccal bone will be < 2 mm, and soft tissue augmentation with a collagen matrix (Fibrogide, Geistlich) if soft tissue thickness will be < 2mm .
|
Insertion of an osseointegrated implant into the bone of anterior maxilla/mandible, following the right prosthetic plan
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of adjunctive bone and soft tissue augmentation procedures need.
Time Frame: during implant placement
|
Number of participants with the need for adjunctive reconstructive hard tissue procedure during implant placement will be evaluated as a frequency (Yes/No) after a digital prosthetically driven implant placement.
The need for soft tissue augmentation during implant placement will be evaluated as a frequency (Yes/No) by a blinded examiner in case of buccal soft tissue thickness < 2mm assessed at 3mm apical to the full thickness flap margin with a caliber.
|
during implant placement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Peri-Implant Health
Time Frame: 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Peri-implant health will be assessed as a frequency (Yes/No) at 1, 3, 5 years after prosthetic crown delivery by a blinded examiner in case of: absence of clinical signs of inflammation, absence of bleeding and/or suppuration on gentle probing, no increase in probing depth compared to previous examinations, absence of bone loss beyond crestal bone level changes resulting from initial bone remodeling
|
1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient Reported Outcome Measurements
Time Frame: crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Patient's satisfaction with the final result will be assessed by means of a 100 mm VAS scale ranging from 0 (no satisfaction) to 100 (best possible satisfaction), recording patient's experience
|
crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Clinical parameters: Probing Depth (PD) and Recession (REC)
Time Frame: crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Probing Depth (PD) and Recession (REC) will be recorded in mm. with a periodontal probe (P-UNC 15, Hu Friedy) inserted with a standardised pressure into the peri-implant sulcus at 6 sites per implant (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual and disto-lingual)
|
crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Clinical parameters: Bleeding on Probing (BoP)
Time Frame: crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Bleeding on Probing (BoP) will be recorded as presence/absence with a periodontal probe (P-UNC 15, Hu Friedy) inserted with a standardised pressure into the peri-implant sulcus at 6 sites per implant (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual and disto-lingual)
|
crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Marginal Bone Level (MBL)
Time Frame: crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Marginal Bone Level (MBL) will be evaluated by a blinded examiner analysing an intra-oral radiograph on a computer software (Image J), as the distance in mm. between the smooth-rough interface and the mesial and distal bone level.
The radiographs will be performed using a customized PVS bite block and an alignment device
|
crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Aesthetic
Time Frame: crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Aesthetic will be evaluated by a blinded examiner analysing pictures using the modified pink and white aesthetic score (PES/WES system, Belser et al. 2009) and giving a score from 0 to 20.
|
crown delivery, 1, 3, 5 years post loading
|
Volumetric bone and soft tissue changes
Time Frame: before tooth extraction, 4 months after tooth extraction, at prosthetic crown delivery and 1, 3 and 5 year after crown delivery.
|
Volumetric bone change will be assessed by a blinded examiner analysing on a computer software (SMOP) DICOM files from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan.
Contour soft tissue change and buccal soft tissue volume will be assessed by a blinded examiner analysing on a computer software (SMOP) STL files from digital impression.
Dynamic Soft tissue healing will be assessed by a blinded examiner analysing superimposition on a computer software (SMOP) of DICOM files (from CBCT) and STL files (from digital impression)
|
before tooth extraction, 4 months after tooth extraction, at prosthetic crown delivery and 1, 3 and 5 year after crown delivery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marco Clementini, DDS, PhD, Centro Specialistico Odontoiatrico, Rome
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tonetti MS, Jung RE, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Cosyn J, Fickl S, Figuero E, Goldstein M, Graziani F, Madianos P, Molina A, Nart J, Salvi GE, Sanz-Martin I, Thoma D, Van Assche N, Vignoletti F. Management of the extraction socket and timing of implant placement: Consensus report and clinical recommendations of group 3 of the XV European Workshop in Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:183-194. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13131.
- Clementini M, Agostinelli A, Castelluzzo W, Cugnata F, Vignoletti F, De Sanctis M. The effect of immediate implant placement on alveolar ridge preservation compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction: Radiographic results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jul;46(7):776-786. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13125. Epub 2019 May 31.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIP/ARP/SH
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bone Augmentation
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
BonusBio Group LtdRecruitingBone Augmentation | Bone GraftsIsrael
-
Pedro TortamanoUnknownBone Augmentation | Alveolar Bone Grafting
-
Medical University of ViennaActive, not recruiting
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...Completed
-
Nobel BiocareUnknownHorizontal Bone AugmentationGermany, Italy, Serbia
-
Botiss Medical AGCONVIDIA clinical research GmbH; botiss biomaterials GmbHRecruitingRidge Augmentation | Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) | Periodontal Bone DefectAustria, Denmark, Italy
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesCompletedAlveolar Ridge Augmentation | Bone Transplantation
-
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityActive, not recruitingBone Augmentation | Tooth Extraction Status NosSaudi Arabia
Clinical Trials on Prosthetically driven implant placement
-
MIS Implant Technologies, LtdThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioRecruiting
-
University of BernNot yet recruitingComplications | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | Cost-Benefit Analysis | Cost-effectiveness | Esthetic Zone | Single Tooth Dental Implant | Single Tooth Lost | Accuracy of Dental Implants | Dimensional Changes | Implant Survival and Success | Frequency of Treatment ProtocolSwitzerland
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingJaw, Edentulous, Partially | Acquired Absence of Single ToothChina
-
University of CagliariRecruiting
-
Hospital General Universitario Morales MeseguerNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade Católica PortuguesaDanilo FernandesCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedAtrophic Maxillary Ridge and Mandibular RidgeEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownEdentulous Alveolar Ridge
-
Columbia UniversityCompletedGingival Recession | Bone Loss, Alveolar
-
Misr International UniversityNot yet recruiting