The Evaluation of Curative Effect on Treatment of Tumor Above Thalidomide Combined With Megestrol

December 12, 2018 updated by: Shenzhen Fifth People's Hospital

Prospective Clinical Study of the Effect of Thalidomide Combined With Megestrol Acetate on Lymphocyte, Inflammatory Factor Regulation and Nutritional Status in Patients With Advanced Malignant Tumors

To observe the effect of thalidomide combined with megestrol acetate on lymphocyte, inflammatory factor regulation and nutritional status in patients with advanced malignant tumors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study was to select 200 patients with advanced tumors with an estimated survival of ≥ 2 months. 50 patients were randomly assigned to each group. The patients were divided into chemotherapy group, chemotherapy combined with thalidomide and megestrol acetate group, The best supportive treatment group, the best supportive treatment combined with thalidomide and megestrol acetate group. The chemotherapy group and the best supportive treatment group were the control group. The combined group was administered continuously for 8 weeks according to thalidomide 100 mg qn po and megestrol acetate 0.16 qd po. Calculating the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions from each patient before and 8 week after treatment. Patients in each group before treatment, 4th week, and 7th week were observed T cell subsets, B cell subsets, NK cell subsets and the expression of inflammatory cytokines. Through nutritional assessment Table (PG-SGA), Multidimensional Deficit Power Meter (MFSI-SF), Quality of Life Assessment Scale (EORTC QLQ-C30), Prognostic Assessment Form (GPS), Physical Status Assessment Form (ECOG) and lean body mass, upper arm muscle circumference and upper arm muscle area analysis of the effect of thalidomide combined with megestrol acetate on the nutritional status of patients with advanced cancer which reveal that thalidomide combined with megestrol acetate may improve the immune regulation and nutritional status of patients with advanced malignant tumors mechanism.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: yangwei w yang, master
  • Phone Number: 0755-82646002 13826524554
  • Email: junweiyang@163.com

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: wenbin wb gao, doctor
  • Phone Number: 0755-82646002 13266778968
  • Email: drwenbingao@163.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with advanced malignant tumor confirmed by histopathology or cytology (hepatocarcinoma can be clinical diagnosis)
  • Must be able to swallow pills
  • The age of the tester ≥ 18 years old
  • Gender is not limited
  • Kamofsky score > 20 points
  • Estimated survival period ≥ 2 months
  • Childbearing age Women need negative pregnancy test
  • Patients voluntarily sign informed consent and receive follow-up
  • The tester can cooperate to observe adverse events and efficacy
  • All of the above conditions can be included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active upper digestive tract ulcers, obvious vomiting, chronic diarrhea, intestinal obstruction, malabsorption, etc; other patients have been known to affect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism or clearance
  • 2 or more important organ dysfunction
  • Thrombosis Embolism history, except for thrombosis caused by PICC
  • Patients suspected of having a history of allergy to thalidomide tablets
  • Any significant clinical and laboratory abnormalities that researchers believe affect safety evaluators, such as: uncontrollable activity Microbial infection, grade II or above peripheral neuropathy (NCI CTC AE v4.0), congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months, chronic kidney disease, thyroid dysfunction etc, and acceptance may bring significant metabolic or weight changes Patients with clinical disposition
  • Patients with mental disorders, affecting the efficacy of the assessor
  • During the trial period and within 3 months after the end of the trial, the subject and his partner are not willing to contraception
  • Any of the above can not be enrolled.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: chemotherapy group
the patients were recepted chemotherapy alone
Drug: Chemotherapy drugs
According to the NCCN Guidelines
EXPERIMENTAL: chemotherapy combined with TH and MG group
the patients were recepted chemotherapy combined with thalidomide and megestrol
Drug: thalidomide and megestrol acetate
The thalidomide and megestrol acetate administration groups were administered with thalidomide 100 mg qn po and megestrol acetate 0.16 qd po for 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • optimal support treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: the best supportive treatment group
the patients were recepted the best supportive without chemotherapy
Other: optimal support treatment
Patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy and other cancer treatments receive optimal support for 8 weeks
EXPERIMENTAL: the best supportive treatment combined with TH and MG group
the patients were recepted the best supportive combined with thalidomide and megestrol without chemotherapy
Drug: thalidomide and megestrol acetate
The thalidomide and megestrol acetate administration groups were administered with thalidomide 100 mg qn po and megestrol acetate 0.16 qd po for 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • optimal support treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Imaging efficacy evaluation
Time Frame: before and 8 week after treatment
Clinical response Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria Solid Tumors (RECIST), the therapeutic effect was divided into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD). Investigators calculate the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesions from each patient by CT or MRI.
before and 8 week after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Observing the expression of lymphocyte subsets
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Patients were detected Lymphocyte subgroups of 2 ml peripheral blood by Flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur), which inclunde the T cell subsets, NK cell subset, B cell subset(percentage)
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Observing the expression of inflammatory factors
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
2 ml of peripheral blood was taken from each patient. Flow cytometry was used to detect changes of inflammatory factor expression which include the IL-2, IL- 4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, IFN-γ and TNF-α(ug/ml)
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Nutritional assessment
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Scored Patient-Generated Subjiective Global Assessment（PG-SGA）form was used in the present study. The total score of PG-SGA is summed by the following four subscale scores（A+B+C+D）. The first measurement score（A）is self-assessed by the subject and consists of the following four parts: Weight Table（0-4），Eating Situation Table（0-6），Symptom Table （0-22），Activity and Body Function Table（0-3）. The remaining three measurements are completed by trained registered clinical physicians， dieticians，and nurses: Scale of relationship between disease and nutritional needs（B）（0-6），Metabolic demand scale（C）（0-9），Physical examination scale（D）（0-24）. The scoring was controlled by one researcher (H.R). The lower scores represent a better outcome and the higher scores represent a worse outcome.
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multidimensional deficient power assessment
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Multidimensional deficient power assessment (MFSI-SF) was used in the present study. The MFSI-SF scale contains 30 subjects' subjective feelings，such as muscle soreness and memory loss. Subjects were scored according to the degree of each sensation (0-4). The MFSI-SF scale total score is the sum of each sensation score (0-120). The lower scores represent a better outcome and the higher scores represent a worse outcome.
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Quality of Life Assessment Table (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used in the present study. The Quality of Life Assessment Table contains 28 subjects' subjective feelings and symptoms，such as tiredness and diarrhea within one week (A)，and two other indicators: health status，quality of life within one week (B). Subjects were scored according to the degree of each sensation (A 0-4) and (B 1-7). The Quality of Life Assessment Table is divided into two parts: the first part of the total score (0-112); the second part of the total scores (2-14). In the first part of the total scores: the lower scores represent a better outcome and the higher scores represent a worse outcome. In the second part of the total scores: the higher scores represent a better outcome and the lower scores represent a worse outcome.
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Prognostic assessment
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment

The prognostic assessment by GPS scores which were calculated by detecting peripheral blood CRP and albumin from each tumor patients.

GPS scores：CRP < 10 mg/l，albumin> 35g/l，GPS 0；CRP > 10 mg/l，albumin > 35 g/l，GPS 1；CRP > 10 mg/l，albumin < 35 g/l，GPS 2. The lower scores represent a better outcome and the higher scores represent a worse outcome.
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Performance status assessment
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
The performance status of patients with cancer is measured by the clinician through the ECOG score form (score:0-5)
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Lean body mass
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Patient's waist circumference and weight were measured by trained registered clinical dietitians, and the measuring was controlled by one researcher (H.R). The researcher calculate lean body mass by measurements of waist circumference and body weight
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Upper arm muscle circumference and upper arm muscle area
Time Frame: before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment
Patient's upper arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness were measured by trained registered clinical dietitians, and the measuring was controlled by one researcher (H.R). The researcher calculate Upper arm muscle circumference and upper arm muscle area by measurements of upper arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness
before , the fourth and the seventh weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shenzhen Fifth People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 10, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 10, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • shenzhenfifth 201807

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings