Comparison of Osteocentral Versus Locoregional Anesthesia in Case of Mandibular Molar Pulpitis (COQ)

June 27, 2022 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Comparison of the Variations of the Cardiovascular Parameters and the Efficiency of the Osteocentral Anesthesia (Quicksleeper™) and the Locoregional Anesthesia in the Case of Mandibular Pulpitis

The irreversible acute pulpitis is the most common emergency at the hospital during dental consultation. Pulpitis are characterized by intense and spontaneous oro-facial pains. In case of mandibular molar, the emergency treatment consists in realizing a pulpotomy (eviction of cameral pulp) under locoregional anesthesia called inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The latter represents a real challenge, since inflammation may decrease its action. To mitigate this deficiency and the drawbacks of the IANB (onset and duration of the anesthesia, bites risk reported with IANB) other anesthesias are proposed. In particular the computerized intraosseous technique anesthesia of which the Quicksleeper™ system is a part. However, according to the observers, a mild to severe tachycardia have been reported.

Very few valid clinical trials exists on the subject, most being realized with systems of intraosseous anesthesia other than Quicksleeper™. Therefore, the aim of this study is first to analyze the variations of the cardiovascular parameters into two groups of anesthesia: locoregional anesthesia and Quicksleeper ™ system; and then, to compare the efficiency, side effects, operating consequences of both techniques. This study should provide better data about potential risk with computerized intraosseous technique such has Quicksleeper ™ system in healthy or cardiovascular risk patient.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

When the patient arrive in the dental care center, an initial assessment is made to get the diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis:

  1. Anamnesis:

    acute and spontaneous oro-facial pain, pulsatile severe intensity, which could irradiate toward the ear and/or jaw, exacerbated by cold or hot.

  2. Clinical exams: positive vitality tests (electric test and cold pressor test)
  3. Further examination (radiography)

The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be checked and the informed consent of the patient will be taken. The patient is then randomized in one of the group (experimental or control). He will fill a questionnaire (Corah's scale) for evaluating his state of anxiety during care. A monitoring of cardiac parameters is made during the care at defined moment.

The patient evaluates his pain himself with the VAS (Visual Analog Score), before the intervention. The anesthesia is carried out by only one experimenter, with the Quickslepper™ handpiece but different specific needles.

Each patient receive 1.8 mL of 4% articaine 1:100 000 on a period of 2 minutes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Loire-Atlantique
      • Nantes, Loire-Atlantique, France, 44093
        • Nantes Universitary Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • real irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular molar in dental emergency consultation at the Nantes hospital
  • Healthy patient without medical history (ASA 1), without treatment for heart rate distress (anti arrhythmic, beta-blocking drug)
  • Major and covered by the social security
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA > 1
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Minors
  • Adults under guardianships
  • Adults deprived of freedom
  • Impossibility to obtain for informed consent
  • Allergy to anesthetic components
  • Contraindication of vasoconstrictor
  • Angle closure glaucoma

    • Pheochromocytomas
    • Bisphosphonate IV
    • Irradiated patient (upper respiratory and gastrointestinal tract cancer)
    • Contraindication with Mono-amino oxidase inhibitors
  • Acute apical periodontitis
  • Pulpitis on wisdom teeth
  • Vital teeth with fixed prosthesis
  • Active periodontal disease
  • Local anatomic difficulty
  • No reference tooth for vitality dental test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computerized intraosseous technique (Quicksleeper™)
patients will receive the anesthetic solution with computerized intraosseous technique anesthesia near the tooth roots involved.

The anesthetic solution is administered with a specific equipment allowing the injection step by step:

  • anesthesia of the interdental papilla,
  • positioning of the needle and perforating of the interdental space,
  • Injection of the solution. All of these steps are based on an adjustment of the different part of this equipment.
Active Comparator: loco-regional anesthesia (IANB technique)
patients will receive the anesthetic solution with the loco-regional anesthesia technique: near the place where the nerve goes into the jaw, based on osteo muscular markers.
The anesthetic solution is delivered by a needle near to the inferior alveolar nerve before it enters the mandibular foramen.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time required (in minutes) to re-obtain the baseline cardiovascular parameters like reported before injection: expected event.
Time Frame: at day 0, from T0 minute to T14 minutes
  • 3 successive values of heart rate similar to those registered before injection.
  • 3 successive values of blood pressure (diastolic and systolic) similar to those registered before injection.
at day 0, from T0 minute to T14 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the pain of the patient between the two anesthetic techniques
Time Frame: 3 days
Scores measured with Visual Analog Score( Heft-Parker's pain assessment) (minimum score : no pain ; maximal score : maximum pain unimaginable)
3 days
Compare the possible postoperative course between the 2 anesthetic techniques
Time Frame: 3 days
The postoperative course will be evaluated using a post-operative table to be completed by the patient at Day + 1, Day + 2 and Day + 3. Collection of information by phone call to the patient. The presence or absence of the following item is measured : pain after waking up, swelling, hematoma, seepage, higher tooth sensation, bite, possibility of feeding, mouth opening limitation.
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC18_0268

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endodontic Inflammation

Clinical Trials on computerized intraosseous technique (Quicksleeper™)

Search Similar Trials