Bipolar RFA Using Twin ICW Electrodes vs. Switching Monopolar RFA for Recurrent HCC

April 3, 2020 updated by: Jeong Min Lee, Seoul National University Hospital

Radiofrequency Ablation Using Internally Cooled Wet Electrodes in Bipolar Mode for the Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Locoregional Treatment: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study

This study was conducted to provide preliminary data for the main trial to compare efficacy between bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using twin internally cooled-wet electrodes and switching monopolar RFA using separable clustered electrodes in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • radiologic or pathologic diagnosis of HCC recurrence after locoregional treatment
  • HCC nodules measuring 1 cm or larger and smaller than 5 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • more than three HCC nodules
  • tumors with major vascular invasion or abutment to the central portal or hepatic vein with a diameter > 5mm
  • extrahepatic metastasis
  • Child-Pugh class C
  • severe coagulopathy (platelet cell count of less than 50,000 cells/mm3 or prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) prolongation of more than 50 %)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TICW-RFA
Bipolar RFA using twin internally cooled-wet electrodes
Bipolar RFA in which RF currents flow between two electrodes
Saline-enhanced twin internally cooled electrodes allow intratumoral injection of a saline solution during the application of the RF current that alters the tissue conductivity
Other Names:
  • CWTN-T
Active Comparator: SC-RFA
Switching monopolar RFA using separable clustered electrodes
A separable clustered electrode is similar to a clustered electrode, although it differs from a conventional clustered electrode in that each individual electrode is separable.
Other Names:
  • Octopus®
Monopolar RFA using multiple electrodes with switching mode

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minimum diameter of ablation zone per unit time
Time Frame: 3 days after RFA
Minimum diameter of ablative zone per unit time on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm.
3 days after RFA

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technique efficacy
Time Frame: 1 month after RFA
Technical success on 1 month follow-up imaging after RFA (no residual/progressed tumor)
1 month after RFA
IDR rate
Time Frame: 12 months, 24 months after RFA
Cumulative intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) rate over 2 years after RFA
12 months, 24 months after RFA
EM rate
Time Frame: 12 months, 24 months after RFA
Cumulative extrahepatic metastasis (EM) rate over 2 years after RFA
12 months, 24 months after RFA
Local tumor progression (LTP)
Time Frame: 12 months, 24 months after RFA
Cumulative LTP rates in two groups in 2 years after RFA
12 months, 24 months after RFA

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication
Time Frame: 1 month after RFA
Description and comparison of the type and incidence of major complication after RFA are assessed according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) grading system in two groups.
1 month after RFA
Ablation time
Time Frame: 1 day
RFA procedure time in each patient.
1 day
Volume of ablative zone
Time Frame: 3 days after RFA
Volume of ablative zone on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm3
3 days after RFA

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SNUH-2015-0401

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Separable clustered electrodes

Search Similar Trials