Connectivity and Neural Signatures of Consciousness in Unresponsive States (CONSCIUS)

May 17, 2024 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Connectivity and Neural Signatures of Consciousness In Unresponsive States (CONSCIUS) - a Study of Brain Activity in Disorders of Consciousness

The CONSCIUS study is a prospective, interventional study including patients with acute brain injury and impaired consciousness implanted with intracranial electrodes. The aim of the study is to investigate seizures and thalamocortical neural dynamics underlying behavioral unresponsiveness.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Individuals with severe brain injury often require extensive treatment in intensive care units (ICU) and hospitalization wards while uncertainty prevails about the recovery of consciousness and cognitive abilities. Especially in the acute phase after injury, treatment decisions have a tremendous impact on outcome, but rely on assessments of behavioral responsiveness which are known to be unreliable and subject to many confounders. Objective, quantifiable diagnostic and prognostic measures that can be deployed at the bedside during the ICU stay are lacking. Development of new metrics are hampered by our lack of a fundamental understanding of (i) thalamocortical network mechanisms underlying consciousness and (ii) brain-injury induced neural dynamics impacting both consciousness and outcome. Continuous EEG monitoring has been used to aid in this respect to (i) predict recovery of consciousness and outcome, and (ii) diagnose nonconvulsive seizures in unresponsive patients. Although promising, it lacks sensitivity, spatial resolution, and causal power. There is an urgent need for techniques allowing high-precision detection of pathological dynamics, patient stratification and prediction of a capacity for consciousness recovery in acute unresponsive patients with brain injury. Intracranial electrodes as part of multimodal monitoring in subjects with impaired consciousness and severe brain injury allow continuous bedside recordings of high spatiotemporal resolution in different network nodes and allows inducing brain perturbations, transcending correlational evidence of network analysis. This technique could increase the detection and treatment of nonconvulsive seizures contributing to brain injury and unresponsiveness and simultaneously allows to study networks supporting consciousness. This can lead to new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for recovery based on thalamocortical profiles of activity, reactivity (complexity) and connectivity, ultimately paving to way for the development of biomarker-driven treatments to support early recovery such as deep brain stimulation. Eventually this can contribute to clinical decision making: abstaining from aggressive treatment in patients with no potential for recovery, and more importantly, continuing treatment in subjects with a responsive brain but without clear behavioural correlate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old or older
  • Brain injury of any kind, with impaired consciousness or suspected seizures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years old
  • Known pregnancy
  • Any condition that, in the judgement of the investigator, makes participation in the study unsafe or unfeasible (e.g., irreversible coagulopathy, large intracranial tumors, surgical technical problems…)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acute brain injury
Patients with acute brain injury with reduced consciousness that undergo multimodal intracranial monitoring, or with suspected seizures
Placement of intracranial electrodes in the cortico-subcortical system
Other Names:
  • Depth electrodes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of electrographic epileptiform activity (ictal and ictal-interictal continuum activity) on intracranial versus scalp electroencephalography (EEG).
Time Frame: A maximum of 4 weeks after electrode implantation.
The primary aim is to compare the incidence of ictal and ictal-interictal continuum epileptiform activity on intracranial versus scalp EEG.
A maximum of 4 weeks after electrode implantation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlating neural activity patterns (local field potentials and complexity) with behavioral responsiveness (measured using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised).
Time Frame: A maximum of 4 weeks after electrode implantation.
Correlation of profiles of neural activity and reactivity with the behavioral state using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).
A maximum of 4 weeks after electrode implantation.
Acute effects of electrical stimulation on behavioral responsiveness (measured using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised).
Time Frame: During electrical stimulation trials, performed in the first 4 weeks after electrode implantation.
Effects of electrical stimulation on behavioral responsiveness will be measured using the Coma Recovery Scale Revised (CRS-R).
During electrical stimulation trials, performed in the first 4 weeks after electrode implantation.
Correlation of neural activity profiles with long-term outcome (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended)
Time Frame: At 6 months and 1 year follow-up.
Profiles of activity and reactivity identified during the acute stage of the disease will be correlated with long-term outcome measures mainly at 6m and 1y, using Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.
At 6 months and 1 year follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tom Theys, MD PhD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seizures

Clinical Trials on Intracranial electrodes

3
Subscribe