Differential Responses to Drugs and Sweet Tastes (HAP)
Hypomania, Amphetamine, and Preferences for Sweets
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
- University of Chicago
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
- University of Chicago Medical Center - Human Behavioral Pharmacology Lab
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18-19 years old
- BMI of 19-26
- Physical/EKG/Medical History/Medications Approved by Physician for d-amphetamine
- at least High School education
- Fluent in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- No Current Mood, Anxiety, Eating or Psychotic Disorder
- No current psychotropic medication
- No Recent Drug Dependence
- < 4 alcoholic drinks/day for males; < 3 alcoholic drinks/day for females (monthly average)
- No weekly (or more frequent) illicit drug use
- No women who are pregnant, nursing, or planning pregnancy within 3 months (birth control is okay)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo arm
Participant will receive placebo oral capsule during this four hour session.
|
Placebo oral capsule
|
|
Experimental: amphetamine 10 mg arm
Participant will receive d-amphetamine 10 mg oral capsule during this four hour session.
|
d-amphetamine 10 mg oral capsule
|
|
Experimental: amphetamine 20 mg arm
Participant will receive d-amphetamine 20 mg oral capsule during this four hour session.
|
d-amphetamine 20 mg oral capsule
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Subjective Effects as Assessed by Score on "Feel Drug", "Feel High", "Like Drug", and "Want More" Sub-scales of Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ).
Time Frame: End of study (Baseline - time 0 and approximately 4 weeks later)
|
Participants will complete The Drug Effects Questionnaire during the initial baseline session to determine their subjective stimulant profile.
The Dug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) is a visual analog scale questionnaire that assesses the extent to which subjects experience four subjective states: "Feel Drug", "Feel High", "Like Drug", and "Want More".
All sub-scales are scored on a visual analogue scale (Scroll bar on computer screen) ranging from 0-100. 100 represents the highest score for that subjective state, and the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
|
End of study (Baseline - time 0 and approximately 4 weeks later)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Grossman P, van Beek J, Wientjes C. A comparison of three quantification methods for estimation of respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Psychophysiology. 1990 Nov;27(6):702-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb03198.x.
- Grossman P, Taylor EW. Toward understanding respiratory sinus arrhythmia: relations to cardiac vagal tone, evolution and biobehavioral functions. Biol Psychol. 2007 Feb;74(2):263-85. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.014. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
- Calabrese JR, Hirschfeld RM, Reed M, Davies MA, Frye MA, Keck PE, Lewis L, McElroy SL, McNulty JP, Wagner KD. Impact of bipolar disorder on a U.S. community sample. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;64(4):425-32. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0412.
- Chandler RA, Wang PW, Ketter TA, Goodwin GM. A new US-UK diagnostic project: mood elevation and depression in first-year undergraduates at Oxford and Stanford universities. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Jul;118(1):81-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01193.x.
- de Lauzon B, Romon M, Deschamps V, Lafay L, Borys JM, Karlsson J, Ducimetiere P, Charles MA; Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante Study Group. The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 is able to distinguish among different eating patterns in a general population. J Nutr. 2004 Sep;134(9):2372-80. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.9.2372.
- Francis LJ, Robbins M, Louden SH, Haley JM. A revised psychoticism scale for the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire: a study among clergy. Psychol Rep. 2001 Jun;88(3 Pt 2):1131-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1131.
- Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB, Spitzer RL, Davies M, Borus J, Howes MJ, Kane J, Pope HG Jr, Rounsaville B, et al. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;49(8):630-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080038006.
- Haertzen CA. Development of scales based on patterns of drug effects, using the addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI). Psychol Rep. 1966 Feb;18(1):163-94. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.18.1.163. No abstract available.
- Hoeppner BB, Stout RL, Jackson KM, Barnett NP. How good is fine-grained Timeline Follow-back data? Comparing 30-day TLFB and repeated 7-day TLFB alcohol consumption reports on the person and daily level. Addict Behav. 2010 Dec;35(12):1138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
- Hirschfeld RM, Holzer C, Calabrese JR, Weissman M, Reed M, Davies M, Frye MA, Keck P, McElroy S, Lewis L, Tierce J, Wagner KD, Hazard E. Validity of the mood disorder questionnaire: a general population study. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;160(1):178-80. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.178.
- Waleeprakhon P, Ittasakul P, Lotrakul M, Wisajun P, Jullagate S, Ketter TA. Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire Thai version. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Aug 18;10:1497-502. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S67842. eCollection 2014.
- Jacob T, Seilhamer RA, Bargeil K, Howell DN. Reliability of Lifetime Drinking History among alcohol dependent men. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Sep;20(3):333-7. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.333.
- Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH. Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(3):275-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00433062.
- Kessler RC, Crum RM, Warner LA, Nelson CB, Schulenberg J, Anthony JC. Lifetime co-occurrence of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence with other psychiatric disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;54(4):313-21. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160031005.
- Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, Locke BZ, Keith SJ, Judd LL, Goodwin FK. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse. Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. JAMA. 1990 Nov 21;264(19):2511-8.
- Rock PL, Goodwin GM, Harmer CJ. The common adolescent bipolar phenotype shows positive biases in emotional processing. Bipolar Disord. 2010 Sep;12(6):606-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00859.x.
- Trost S, Diekhof EK, Mohr H, Vieker H, Kramer B, Wolf C, Keil M, Dechent P, Binder EB, Gruber O. Investigating the Impact of a Genome-Wide Supported Bipolar Risk Variant of MAD1L1 on the Human Reward System. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Oct;41(11):2679-87. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.70. Epub 2016 May 13.
- Weafer J, Burkhardt A, de Wit H. Sweet taste liking is associated with impulsive behaviors in humans. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun 17;8:228. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00228. eCollection 2014.
- Gontkovsky ST. Sensitivity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition (WASI-II) to the neurocognitive deficits associated with the semantic dementia variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A case study. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2017 May-Jun;24(3):288-293. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2016.1154857. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
- White TL, Justice AJ, de Wit H. Differential subjective effects of D-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002 Nov;73(4):729-41. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00818-3.
- Yip SW, Doherty J, Wakeley J, Saunders K, Tzagarakis C, de Wit H, Goodwin GM, Rogers RD. Reduced subjective response to acute ethanol administration among young men with a broad bipolar phenotype. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jul;37(8):1808-15. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.45. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Dopamine Agents
- Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors
- Central Nervous System Stimulants
- Sympathomimetics
- Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors
- Amphetamine
- Dextroamphetamine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB16-1293
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.