Study to Assess the ART Impact on the Brain Outcomes. The ARBRE Study (ARBRE)

November 22, 2023 updated by: Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia

Observational Prospective Trial to Investigate the Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation With Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors on Brain Outcomes:The ARBRE Study:Impact of AntiRetroviral Therapy With INSTI on BRain outcomEs (ARBRE) According to the Time of Therapy Initation

The ARBRE Study is an observational prospective trial aimed at investigating the impact of the therapy initiation with INTIs on brain outcomes according to the time of therapy initiation. Three study arms are considered: 1) Early treated HIV-1 infected patients (<3 months since estimated date of infection), 2) Regularly treated HIV-1 infected patients (>6 months since estimated date of infection), 3) Matched seronegative control group. Study assessments will be performed at baseline, 1 month and 12 months. Study assessments will comprise comprehensive evaluation of brain outcomes. They will include cognitive functioning, neuroimaging parameters, and functional outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Randomized patients will receive LA CAB+RPV administration in the hospital (standard of care) or out-of- hospital administration every 2 months (M2, M4, M6, M8,M10, M12). Medical visits, rutinary blood tests and pharmacy visits at the hospital of reference will take place every 6 months- at baseline, M1 (if patient has not previously receiving LA CAB+RPV), M6 and M12.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HIV patients early treated HIV chronically patients non HIV participants

Description

The study criteria for participation in the study will be the following:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65 years old
  • Voluntary participation.
  • Signed written consent.
  • Confirmed HIV-1 infection (for arms A and B).
  • Intention to initiate therapy with cART containing an INSTI. Specifically, the regimen included raltegravir, elvitegravir or dolutegravir.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior diagnosis of opportunistic infection involving CNS.
  • Current diagnosis of psychiatric disorder.
  • Current or past diagnosis of neurologic disease.
  • Inability to develop any of the tasks required for the study.
  • Pregnancy.
  • History of suboptimal adherence (for arms A and B).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Early treated patients
Patients with confirmed HIV-1 infection attended in the HIV Unit of the Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol who initiated therapy presenting recent HIV-1 infection. Recent HIV-1 infection was defined as having a positive plasma viral load and/or p24 antigen with a negative ELISA or having a positive ELISA and undetermined Western-Blot, or having a positive ELISA and absence of p31 antigen in a positive Western-Blot, or seroconversion ELISA in less than 3 months.
Regularly treated patients
Patients with confirmed HIV-1 infection attended in the HIV Unit of the Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol who initiated therapy, did not fulfil the criteria for recent HIV-1 infection, and had an estimated time >6 months reported by the patient and/or by the responsible physician since HIV transmission.
Seronegative volunteers
HIV-uninfected volunteers, matched to age, sex, and educational level with groups A and B.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Global Cognitive Functioning
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 48
The measure used will be NPZ-12 (NeuroPsychological Z-12). Minimum value: -5 Maximum value: +5. Mean: 0. Lower score will represent worse global cognitive functioning; higher score will represent better global cognitive functioning.
From Baseline to Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 48
The measure used will be a checklist of symptoms involving the central nervous system. Minimum value: 0; Maximum value: 140. Lower score will represent better neuropsychiatric status; higher score will represent worse neuropsychiatric status.
From Baseline to Week 48
Change in Daily Living Functioning
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 48
Daily living functioning will be measured by a self-reported scale indicating daily living areas impaired. Minimum score: 0; Maximum score: 13. A lower score will represent better daily functioning; a higher score will represent worse daily functioning.
From Baseline to Week 48
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to week 48
Depressive symptoms will be measured by a self-reported scale that will assess depressive symptoms. Minimum score: 0; Maximum score: 21. A lower score will represent better depressive status; a higher score will represent worse depressive status.
From baseline to week 48
Change in Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 48
Anxiety symptoms will be measured by a self-reported scale that will assess anxiety symptoms. Minimum score: 0; Maximum score: 21. A lower score will represent better anxiety status; a higher score will represent worse anxiety status.
From Baseline to Week 48
Change in Daily Perceived Stress
Time Frame: From baseline to week 48
Perceived stress will be measured by a self-reported scale that will assess daily symptoms of perceived stress. Minimum score: 0; Maximum score: 40. A lower score will represent better perceived stress status; a higher score will represent worse perceived stress status.
From baseline to week 48
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 48
Quality of life will be measured by a self-reported scale that will assess global quality of life. Minimum score: 1; Maximum score: 4. A lower score will represent worse quality of life; a higher score will represent better quality of life.
From Baseline to Week 48
Change in Neuroimaging Markers
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 48
Neuroimaging markers will be assessed by 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The specific markers will be caudate nucleus, ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens, putamen, pallidum, thalamus, dorsomedial, dorsolateral, cingulate, ventromedial, medial orbitofrontal, and lateral orbitofrontal cortex. The outcome will be based on change in any of them.
From Baseline to Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa
IrsiCaixa
Institut de Diagnòstic per la Imatge (IDI)
BCN Checkpoint

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jose A. Muñoz-Moreno, Lluita contra la Sida Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 26, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 23, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 29, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FLS-ANT-2015-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings