Efficacy Of Doxophylline As A Sparing Treatment For Inhaled Corticosteroids In Mexican Children With Asthma

March 14, 2019 updated by: Sandra Nora Gonzalez Diaz, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
This study evaluated the efficacy of doxophylline as a steroid sparing treatment in Mexican children with asthma treated with medium ir high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). It is a cross over study in which both groups of patients will receive doxophylline plus a lower steroid dose maintaining the same treatment step according to GINA guidelines, one group will maintain the same treatment dose while the other will start with doxophylline with the lower ICS dose, and by the middle of the study both groups will interchange treatment schemes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are first-line drugs for the treatment of persistent asthma. The effectiveness of existing ICS is excellent; however, a number of questions remain regarding its possible adverse effects, despite the fact that the use of the inhalation route has allowed the minimization of the systemic exposure to these drugs. Methylxanthines are widely used in the treatment of asthma. It is one of the few medications for asthma that can be administered orally. They are useful especially in patients who cannot adapt to inhaled medications. Methylxanthines are unique in exhibiting dual-function properties by inducing bronchodilation and having anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Theophylline is the oldest methylxanthine and non-specifically inhibits phosphodiesterase, it is a little used drug because it has many adverse effects with lower therapeutic index. Doxophylline is a drug of the family of methylxanthines, with a similar efficacy compared to theophylline when applied in the treatment of various respiratory diseases, but with better tolerability profile. Doxophylline has been shown to be a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drug with a wider therapeutic window than other methylxanthines. Clinical studies have reported that doxophylline is more effective in improving lung function tests in adults and children, as well as in decreasing clinical symptoms, reducing the incidence of adverse effects and the need of emergency bronchodilators, with a better profile in terms of safety and it has been demonstrated that doxophylline potentially reduces the need for corticosteroids.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Mexican patients between 6 and 16 years old.
  2. Clinical diagnosis of asthma according to the current guidelines of the Global Asthma Initiative (GINA) 2018.
  3. Patients with asthma treated with budesonide at medium or high doses during (GINA guidelines´ steps 3 or 4) at least two months before the first study visit. Budesonide medium dose: 200-400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and 400-800 mcg / day (> 12 years). Budesonide high dose: > 400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and > 800 mcg / day (> 12 years).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients <6 or ≥16 years of age.
  2. Patients with <16 kg of body weight.
  3. Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular or intravenous) during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
  4. Patients who have presented an asthma exacerbation that required hospitalization during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
  5. Any other chronic lung disease that could impair lung function evaluation.
  6. Cardiovascular, infectious, metabolic or neoplastic disease that could interfere with the evaluation of the patient.
  7. Current use of drugs that interact with doxophylline: other xanthines, ephedrine or other sympathomimetics, erythromycin, troleandomycin, lincomycin, clindamycin, allopurinol, cimetidine, two months prior vaccination, propranolol, phenytoin or other anticonvulsants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Budesonide and Doxophylline
Budesonide at the same dose in which the subject is currently treated (GINA step 3 or 4) plus doxophylline at a dose of 18 mg / kg per day
Drug: Doxophylline
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
  • There is no other intervention names
Drug: Budesonide
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
  • There is no other intervention names
Active Comparator: Low budesonide and Doxophylline
Reduced dose of inhaled budesonide (GINA step down) plus doxophylline to a dose of 18 mg / kg per day, maximum of 800 mg / day (Group B)
Drug: Doxophylline
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
  • There is no other intervention names
Drug: Budesonide
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step). After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
  • There is no other intervention names

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the values of the forced expiratory volume on the first second
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Changes in the values of FEV1 (FEV1 in percent predicted) by comparing the baseline to subsequent evaluations.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of rescue therapy
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The use of rescue therapy defined as daily average of inhalations per day according to the data collected in the patient's diaries.
4 weeks
Clinical asthma control assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Differences in clinical asthma control assessment with a visual analogue scale (minimum score is 1, maximum score is 10,) comparing the baseline to follow-up evaluations.
4 weeks
Asthma exacerbations
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Number of asthma exacerbations defined as acute episodes of progressively worsening shortness of breath, coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness or any combination thereof for at least 3 days, reported on the patient´s symptoms log.
4 weeks
Use of systemic corticosteroids
Time Frame: 4 weeks
- The use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days for the treatment of an asthma exacerbation according to the data collected in the patient's diaries.
4 weeks
Changes on the exhaled breath temperature
Time Frame: 4 weeks
-Differences in values exhaled breath temperature measured in Celsius degrees with the X-halo device, comparing the baseline to follow-up evaluations.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sandra Nora González-Díaz, PhD, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DOXO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings