- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03879590
Efficacy Of Doxophylline As A Sparing Treatment For Inhaled Corticosteroids In Mexican Children With Asthma
March 14, 2019 updated by: Sandra Nora Gonzalez Diaz, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
This study evaluated the efficacy of doxophylline as a steroid sparing treatment in Mexican children with asthma treated with medium ir high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).
It is a cross over study in which both groups of patients will receive doxophylline plus a lower steroid dose maintaining the same treatment step according to GINA guidelines, one group will maintain the same treatment dose while the other will start with doxophylline with the lower ICS dose, and by the middle of the study both groups will interchange treatment schemes.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are first-line drugs for the treatment of persistent asthma.
The effectiveness of existing ICS is excellent; however, a number of questions remain regarding its possible adverse effects, despite the fact that the use of the inhalation route has allowed the minimization of the systemic exposure to these drugs.
Methylxanthines are widely used in the treatment of asthma.
It is one of the few medications for asthma that can be administered orally.
They are useful especially in patients who cannot adapt to inhaled medications.
Methylxanthines are unique in exhibiting dual-function properties by inducing bronchodilation and having anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects.
Theophylline is the oldest methylxanthine and non-specifically inhibits phosphodiesterase, it is a little used drug because it has many adverse effects with lower therapeutic index.
Doxophylline is a drug of the family of methylxanthines, with a similar efficacy compared to theophylline when applied in the treatment of various respiratory diseases, but with better tolerability profile.
Doxophylline has been shown to be a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drug with a wider therapeutic window than other methylxanthines.
Clinical studies have reported that doxophylline is more effective in improving lung function tests in adults and children, as well as in decreasing clinical symptoms, reducing the incidence of adverse effects and the need of emergency bronchodilators, with a better profile in terms of safety and it has been demonstrated that doxophylline potentially reduces the need for corticosteroids.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
60
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
2 years to 12 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Mexican patients between 6 and 16 years old.
- Clinical diagnosis of asthma according to the current guidelines of the Global Asthma Initiative (GINA) 2018.
- Patients with asthma treated with budesonide at medium or high doses during (GINA guidelines´ steps 3 or 4) at least two months before the first study visit. Budesonide medium dose: 200-400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and 400-800 mcg / day (> 12 years). Budesonide high dose: > 400 mcg / day (6-11 years) and > 800 mcg / day (> 12 years).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients <6 or ≥16 years of age.
- Patients with <16 kg of body weight.
- Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular or intravenous) during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
- Patients who have presented an asthma exacerbation that required hospitalization during the 2 months prior to the first study visit.
- Any other chronic lung disease that could impair lung function evaluation.
- Cardiovascular, infectious, metabolic or neoplastic disease that could interfere with the evaluation of the patient.
- Current use of drugs that interact with doxophylline: other xanthines, ephedrine or other sympathomimetics, erythromycin, troleandomycin, lincomycin, clindamycin, allopurinol, cimetidine, two months prior vaccination, propranolol, phenytoin or other anticonvulsants.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Budesonide and Doxophylline
Budesonide at the same dose in which the subject is currently treated (GINA step 3 or 4) plus doxophylline at a dose of 18 mg / kg per day
|
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step).
After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step).
After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Low budesonide and Doxophylline
Reduced dose of inhaled budesonide (GINA step down) plus doxophylline to a dose of 18 mg / kg per day, maximum of 800 mg / day (Group B)
|
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step).
After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
Both groups will receive doxophylline one group will maintain the ICS dose and the other group will receive a reduced ICS dose (Maintaining the same GINA treatment step).
After 4 weeks both groups will interchange treatment scheme.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the values of the forced expiratory volume on the first second
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Changes in the values of FEV1 (FEV1 in percent predicted) by comparing the baseline to subsequent evaluations.
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Use of rescue therapy
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
The use of rescue therapy defined as daily average of inhalations per day according to the data collected in the patient's diaries.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Clinical asthma control assessment
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Differences in clinical asthma control assessment with a visual analogue scale (minimum score is 1, maximum score is 10,) comparing the baseline to follow-up evaluations.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Asthma exacerbations
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Number of asthma exacerbations defined as acute episodes of progressively worsening shortness of breath, coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness or any combination thereof for at least 3 days, reported on the patient´s symptoms log.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Use of systemic corticosteroids
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
- The use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days for the treatment of an asthma exacerbation according to the data collected in the patient's diaries.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Changes on the exhaled breath temperature
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
-Differences in values exhaled breath temperature measured in Celsius degrees with the X-halo device, comparing the baseline to follow-up evaluations.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sandra Nora González-Díaz, PhD, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lal D, Manocha S, Ray A, Vijayan VK, Kumar R. Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of theophylline and doxofylline in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;26(5):443-51. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2015-0006.
- Margay SM, Farhat S, Kaur S, Teli HA. To study the efficacy and safety of doxophylline and theophylline in bronchial asthma. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):FC05-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12438.5743. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
- Rajanandh MG, Nageswari AD, Ilango K. Assessment of various second-line medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014 Jul;41(7):509-13. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12239.
- Riffo-Vasquez Y, Venkatasamy R, Page CP. Steroid sparing effects of doxofylline. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;48:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
- Rajanandh MG, Nageswari AD, Ilango K. Pulmonary function assessment in mild to moderate persistent asthma patients receiving montelukast, doxofylline, and tiotropium with budesonide: a randomized controlled study. Clin Ther. 2014 Apr 1;36(4):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
May 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2019
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 14, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
March 19, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 19, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 14, 2019
Last Verified
March 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Hypersensitivity, Immediate
- Bronchial Diseases
- Lung Diseases, Obstructive
- Respiratory Hypersensitivity
- Hypersensitivity
- Asthma
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Glucocorticoids
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Bronchodilator Agents
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents
- Respiratory System Agents
- Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
- Antitussive Agents
- Budesonide
- Doxofylline
Other Study ID Numbers
- DOXO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.