Combination of Thrombopoietin Mimetic and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Aplastic Anaemia

September 28, 2021 updated by: Safaa AA Khaled

Treatment With Thrombopoietin Mimetic Plus Immunosuppressive Therapy in Egyptian Patients With Aplastic Anaemia

To the investigator's Knowledge this is the first study that will assess Treatment with thrombopoietin Mimetic plus immunosuppressiveTherapy in Egyptian Patients with Aplastic Anaemia.

Aim of the work :

  1. To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and toxicity of the combination of thrombopoietin mimetic and immunosuppressive therapy in Egyptian patients with AA.
  2. To study the influence of this combination on patients' quality of life.
  3. To access evolution to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplastic syndrome , acute leukemia or development of fibrosis

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a bone marrow failure syndrome that, although benign in nature, it influences patients' quality of life and carries poor prognosis.The pathophysiological basis of development of acquired AA include immune-mediated attack, inherent hematopoietic stem cell insufficiency and telomere defects. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the only curative treatment for AA. Unfortunately it is unavailable for many patients due to lack of matched donors furthermore others are ineligible for BMT due to old age or co-morbid conditions. Immunosuppressive therapy was the mainstay of treatment for AA for many years, however many patients developed resistance or refractoriness. Immunosuppressive therapy was in the form of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) which gave hematologic response in nearly 50% of patients , adding cyclosporin A increases this response to 70%. Why some patients became resistant to immunosuppressive therapy ? The answer is not known.

Thrombopoietin mimetic (Eltrombopag) was firstly FDA approved for treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Numerous clinical trials proved the efficacy of anthropometric mimetic in patients with refractory severe AA, leading to its FDA approval for this group of patients. Some researchers proven the efficacy of thrombopoietin mimetic in patients with moderate aplastic anemia.

This study aimed to asses the combination of thrombopoietin mimetic and immunosuppressive therapy in patients with AA.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Assiut, Egypt, 71515
        • Assiut university hospital Internal Medicine Department Hematology and BMT Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible for treatment with thrombopoietin mimetic.
  • Willing to participate in the study and signed informed consent.
  • Unavailability of BMT -

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with inherited aplastic anemia
  • Underlying immune deficiency
  • Contra indication to cyclosporin A
  • Endstage hepatic or renal disease
  • Pregnancy and lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Thrombopoietin mimetic plus immunosuppressive therapy
The intervention group will be given cyclosporin A plus thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetic starting with 50 mg orally daily that would be increased or decreased according to response, for 3-months. Patients will be kept on weekly follow up visits and assessed by peripheral hemogram .
Drug: Combination of thrombopoietin mimetic and cyclosporin A
This is a controlled interventional study that will be carried out in the Clinical Hematology Unit, at the Department of Internal Medicine , Assiut University Hospital. Patients will be recruited among those who attending the outpatient clinic or admitted in the unit.
Other Names:
  • Combination of Eltrombopag plus cyclosporin A
No Intervention: Immunosuppressive therapy
A comparative group will be collected retrospectively and treated with cyclosporin A alone as standard.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with hematologjc response
Time Frame: 2-3months
  1. Platelet number ( time frame(2-3 months) : Increase plt count 20, 000 or more from baseline or independence of platelet transfusion for 2 months
  2. Hemoglobin percent (time frame (2-3 months): increase Hb by 1.5 g/dl from baseline or reduction 4 units of packed red blood cell transfusions for 2- months C) Absolute neutrophilic count response (time frame (2-3 months): increase absolute neutrophil count by 500 per microliter from baseline.

d) Bone marrow cellularity (time frame (2-3 months): increase bone marrow cellularity from baseline
2-3months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with one of the following
Time Frame: 2-3months
  1. Toxicity: development of toxicity leading to cessation of treatment
  2. Evolution: evolution to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria , myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia
  3. Bleeding and cytopenias that met the criteria for severe aplastic anemia and require transfusions
2-3months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Safaa AA Khaled

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Assiut University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Safinaz Hussien, MD, Assiut University
  • Principal Investigator: Sawsan A Abdelaal, M.B.B.Ch, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SKhaled19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings