A Comparison of Incisionless Ultrasound Guided Thread Carpal Tunnel Release and Mini Open Carpal in Patients With Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (TTP-50)
A Prospective Comparison of Incisionless Ultrasound Guided Thread Carpal Tunnel Release and Mini Open Carpal in Patients With Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Transform the Practice Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55901
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A diagnosis of bilateral CTS with symptoms including pain, paresthesia's, and weakness of the hand in the median nerve distribution for minimum of 3 months
- Willingness to undergo bilateral carpal tunnel surgical treatment with one side having the TCTR and the other a mini open carpal tunnel release
- Age 18-65 years of age
- Clinical examination findings (compression test, Tinels, Phalens, etc) consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome.
- Persistence of symptoms after 6 weeks of conservative treatment such as splinting, activity modification, and/or injection therapy.
- Electromyographic evidence of mild, moderate, moderately severe, or severe median nerve neuropathy at the wrist
- Able and willing to complete all follow-up appointments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous CTS surgical release on any of their hands
- Diabetes mellitus
- Hypothyroidism
- Significant Hand arthritis (rheumatologic or osteoarthritis)
- Pregnancy
- Electromyographic evidence of any condition other than CTS affecting the hand
- Workman's compensation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Dominant hand-open Carpal Tunnel Release
Standard mini-open carpal tunnel release (standard of care) on the dominant hand.
|
Patients with bilateral CTS will have one side released with incisionless thread carpal tunnel release and the contralateral side released with the mini-open carpal tunnel release.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Dominant hand-Incisionless thread carpal tunnel release
Incisionless thread carpal tunnel release on the dominant hand.
|
Patients with bilateral CTS will have one side released with incisionless thread carpal tunnel release and the contralateral side released with the mini-open carpal tunnel release.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) functional score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
Measured on a symptom severity scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is normal and 5 is very serious/continued/difficult
|
Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Visual analog pain scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
Pain that participant is currently experiencing the in the hand or risk(0-100)
|
Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Strength testing of grip and pinch
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
Use dynameters and pinch meters
|
Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
|
Disability of the Arm Shoulder Hand DASH
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
he disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms.
The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100.
The main purpose of this study was to assess the longitudinal construct validity of the DASH among patients undergoing surgery.
The second purpose was to quantify self-rated treatment effectiveness after surgery.
|
Change from Baseline to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Papanicolaou GD, McCabe SJ, Firrell J. The prevalence and characteristics of nerve compression symptoms in the general population. J Hand Surg Am. 2001 May;26(3):460-6. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.24972.
- Fajardo M, Kim SH, Szabo RM. Incidence of carpal tunnel release: trends and implications within the United States ambulatory care setting. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Aug;37(8):1599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.035. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
- Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Randsdorp MS, Glerum S, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part I: effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments--a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;91(7):981-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.022.
- Huisstede BM, Randsdorp MS, Coert JH, Glerum S, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part II: effectiveness of surgical treatments--a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;91(7):1005-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.023.
- Guo D, Guo D, Guo J, Malone DG, Wei N, McCool LC. A Cadaveric Study for the Improvement of Thread Carpal Tunnel Release. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Oct;41(10):e351-e357. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.098. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
- Guo D, Tang Y, Ji Y, Sun T, Guo J, Guo D. A non-scalpel technique for minimally invasive surgery: percutaneously looped thread transection of the transverse carpal ligament. Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):40-8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9656-4.
- Guo D, Guo D, Guo J, Schmidt SC, Lytie RM. A Clinical Study of the Modified Thread Carpal Tunnel Release. Hand (N Y). 2017 Sep;12(5):453-460. doi: 10.1177/1558944716668831. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
- Kim PT, Lee HJ, Kim TG, Jeon IH. Current approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;6(3):253-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.3.253. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
- Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ. Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire? J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Apr;29(2):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.10.010.
- Michelotti B, Romanowsky D, Hauck RM. Prospective, randomized evaluation of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: an interim analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73 Suppl 2:S157-60. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000203.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 18-010050
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.