EndoACAB vs PCI for LAD Revascularization (ENPILА)

April 9, 2019 updated by: Vadim Popov, National Research Center of Surgery, Russia

Randomized Study Of Endoscopic Coronary Arterial Bypass Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Anterior Descending Artery Revascularization

The purpose of this study is to determine which treatment option is better for patients who have isolated coronary artery disease (blockages of one vessel supplying blood to the heart muscle). The treatment options compared in this study are:

  1. Endoscopic coronary arterial bypass
  2. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. This study is aimed to determine the best treatment for patients with coronary artery disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Coronary artery disease (CAD), also known as coronary heart disease (CHD) involves the progressive narrowing of the arteries that nourish the heart muscle. CAD is the main cause of death in Russia.

Patients with LAD disease have worse coronary flow outcomes Currently established types of myocardial revascularization are coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). High effectiveness of CABG was proved by multiple studies. PCI is a first line therapy in the treatment of one vessel disease due to the less invasive approach and current technological possibilities of this revascularization method.

However, the established gold standard of multivessel coronary blockage treatment is CABG. It was reflected in the latest ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization, due to the better early and late outcomes associated with the graft specifics.

On the other hand, standard CABD operation has a high injury and morbidity rate, which were factors for development of less invasive techniques of CABG.

According to the latest ESC/EACTS guidelines there are no advantages between PCI and CABG in the LAD disease treatment, both methods are Class I; level of evidence A.

The choice between myocardial revascularization methods in patients with LAD disease is the critical task.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Vadim A Popov, MD. Ph.D. Prof.
  • Phone Number: +79166106609
  • Email: drpopov@mail.ru

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997
        • Recruiting
        • A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery.
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of isolated lesions of LAD are available for revascularization PCI and EndoCAB
  • Suitable candidate for both PCI and EndoCAB as determined by clinical assessment and angiogram review by an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon at the enrolling clinical site
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cardiac surgery of any kind, including CABG
  • Previous thoracic surgery involving the left pleural space
  • Need for concomitant vascular or other cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization (including, but not limited to, valve surgery, aortic resection, left ventricular aneurysmectomy, and carotid endarterectomy or stenting)
  • Indication for chronic oral anticoagulation therapy at the time of randomization
  • Extra-cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 5 years
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or devices used in the trial
  • Therapy with an investigational drug, device or biologic within 1 year prior to randomization, or plan to enroll patient in additional investigational study during participation in this trial
  • Unable to give informed consent or potential for noncompliance with the study protocol in the judgment of the investigator
  • Ejection fraction of 40% or less Left ventricular dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Endoscopic coronary arterial bypass
is defined, for the purposes of this trial, as a planned off-pump minimally invasive (sternal-sparing), isolated LIMA-LAD revascularization
Procedure: Endoscopic coronary arterial bypass
is defined, for the purposes of this trial, as a planned off-pump minimally invasive (sternal-sparing), isolated LIMA-LAD revascularization (50 participants)
Other Names:
  • EndoCAB
Active Comparator: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
will be performed using standard techniques at the discretion of the operator
Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
will be performed using standard techniques at the discretion of the operator (50 participants)
Other Names:
  • PCI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACCE
Time Frame: 1 year
Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), including death,a composite of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events, i.e. the first occurrence of any of the following events: Death from any cause From cardiovascular causes From noncardiovascular causes Stroke or transitory ischemic attack (TIA) MI Hospitalization for repeat revascularization procedure, target (vessel) revascularization by means of PCI or CABG.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural success
Time Frame: 1 year
The treatment will be considered successful when a complete hybrid revascularisation in the absence of complications during the index hospitalization has been achieved.
1 year
Pain assessment
Time Frame: 1 year
assessment of visual analogue scale E.C. Huskisson
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Research Center of Surgery, Russia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 7t7sci9q

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic coronary arterial bypass

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings