Spinal Manipulation and Neuromuscular Performance on Amateur Cyclists
Acute Effects of Spinal Manipulation on the Neuromuscular Performance of Amateur Cyclists: Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Francisco J Germain, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 0034918854525
- Email: francisco.germain@uah.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Pedro de la Villa, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 0034918854525
- Email: pedro.villa@uah.es
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alcalá De Henares, Spain, 28871
- University of Alcala
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Will be recruited from three different local triathlon and cycling clubs.
- Will have to cycle at least 4 hours per week during the preceding 3 months, and to have a cycling experience greater than 2 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having suffered an injury in the month before the study that precluded regular exercise practice
- Having suffered any type of spine injury before the study
- Having previously received Spinal Manipulation Therapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham spinal manipulation
Participants in the 'sham' group will receive a sham mechanical thrust (force set at level 0) instead of an actual one.
In the force level 0, no excursion of the stylus occurs, but the instrument produces the same clicking sound as in the actual SMT condition.
Therefore, the subject does not distinguish between intervention or placebo.
|
Participants in the sham SMT group will undergo a protocol identical to the actual one, with the exception that a sham mechanical thrust (force set at level 0) will be delivered to the targeted areas.
In the force level 0 no excursion of the stylus occurs, but the instrument produces the same clicking sound as in the actual SMT condition
|
|
Experimental: Actual spinal manipulation
Participants in the actual actual spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) group will be assessed through the Activator basic method.
SMT will be performed with the Activator IV Adjusting Instrument (Activator Methods International, Phoenix, AZ) varying the force level depending on the adjusted segment.
|
Participants in the actual spinal manipulative therapy group will be assessed through the activator basic method protocol.
SMT will be performed with an Activator IV (Activator Methods International, Phoenix, AZ) setting the force at level 3 for the low thoracic spine (T7-T12), and level 4 for the lumbar spine and pelvis.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximal force
Time Frame: On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
Peak force registered during an isometric maximal voluntary contraction of the knee extensors.
|
On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
|
Voluntary activation
Time Frame: On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
Electromyographic activity of the vastus lateralis muscle registered during an isometric maximal voluntary contraction of the knee extensors.
|
On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
|
Peak power
Time Frame: On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
Peak power registered during a 30-second Wingate anaerobic cycling test
|
On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
|
Mean power
Time Frame: On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
Mean power registered during a 30-second Wingate anaerobic cycling test
|
On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Pedro de la Villa, MD, PhD, University of Alcala
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEI/HU/2018/09
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.