Neurofeedback for Treatment-resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD)

November 3, 2020 updated by: Pedro Morgado

Neurofeedback With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for OCD Participants With Treatment-resistance

The aim of this study is to teach participants with a OCD diagnosis and treatment-resistance how to decrease the response from a brain region involved in the disease by using a technique called neurofeedback. While using this technique, the participants visualize their own brain response in a screen during a MRI exam. Participants will learn strategies to decrease brain responses. The neurofeedback technique is non-invasive, without known risks to participants. With this study, it is expect that the neurofeedback training over 2 weeks (2 sessions) will reduce the OCD symptoms when compared to a control intervention based on neurofeedback's placebo effects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

OCD individuals will be recruited at Hospital of Braga, Braga, Portugal, in collaboration with the Psychiatry Unit (n = 30, nonrandom convenience sample based on effect size of 0.30, alpha = beta = 0.05, and ANOVA repeated measures within-between interaction). Some participants may quit the study but sample size was predetermined considering a putative 30 percent dropout rate. Clinical history will be assessed (sociodemographic information, disease onset and severity, and previous/current treatments). The participants' neuropsychological state, the blood hormonal levels, and brain function and structure as baseline measures before and after the neurofeedback intervention will be assessed. Two MRI neurofeedback sessions will be performed during 2 weeks (2 distinct days; 36 min per session) in a 3 T MRI scanner. Data analysis will be performed with a repeated measures design (baseline and after neurofeedback) between the groups to measure brain, blood, and neuropsychological changes. Patients will be supervised by a physician to track putative complications/adverse effects during the intervention. The participation will be immediately interrupted in case of adverse reactions or symptomatic worsening and a physician will follow the participants to provide the appropriated care.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Portugal
    • Gualtar
      • Braga, Gualtar, Portugal, 4710-057
        • Recruiting
        • Life and Health Sciences Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Minho
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pedro Morgado, M.D., Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sónia Ferreira, M.Sc.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Maria Picó-Pérez, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary diagnosis of current OCD according to the fifth Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders;
  • Treatment resistance (≥ 3 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in proper dose for ≥ 12 weeks).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant psychiatric or neurological illness;
  • Substance abuse/dependence in the past 6 months (except nicotine/caffeine);
  • Acute suicidal ideation;
  • Psychotropic medication (except selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, anafranil, or low-dose hypnotic or anxiolytic taken occasionally);
  • MRI contraindications (pregnancy, major head trauma, severe claustrophobia, severe back pain, ferromagnetic materials/prostheses/implants inside the body, or other).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Real neurofeedback
Two sessions of neurofeedback training during 2 weeks (2 distinct days; 36 min per session).
Behavioral: Real neurofeedback
Regulation of brain activity in real-time with feedback from brain activity measured with MRI from the orbitofrontal cortex of the participant him/herself. Participants receive feedback of their own brain activity in a screen with pictures. Participants are instructed to try to decrease the pictures transparency to reduce the orbitofrontal cortical activity. Psychotherapy strategies to decrease brain responses will be teach to the participants before the intervention.
Sham Comparator: Sham neurofeedback
Two sessions of placebo/control neurofeedback training during 2 weeks (2 distinct days; 36 min per session).
Behavioral: Sham neurofeedback
Regulation of brain activity in real-time with feedback from brain activity measured with MRI from the orbitofrontal cortex of other participant. Participants receive feedback of other participant' brain activity in a screen with pictures. Participants are instructed to try to decrease the pictures transparency to reduce the orbitofrontal cortex activity. Psychotherapy strategies to decrease brain responses will be teach to the participants before the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Psychometric scale to evaluate obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 50 with the following classification: 0-7 sub-clinical symptoms, 8-15 moderate symptoms, 16-31 severe symptoms, and >= 32 extreme symptoms. This scale can be divided into two subscales: compulsions subscale (score ranging from 0 to 25) and obsessions subscale (score ranging from 0 to 25). The sum of the subscales scores gives the total score of the scale. Lower total and subscale scores represent a better outcome.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Mean change from baseline in Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised score.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Psychometric scale to evaluate obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 72. This scale can be divided into six subscales: checking subscale (score ranging from 0 to 12), hoarding subscale (score ranging from 0 to 12), neutralizing subscale (score ranging from 0 to 12), obsessing subscale (score ranging from 0 to 12), ordering subscale (score ranging from 0 to 12), and washing subscale (score ranging from 0 to 12). The sum of the subscales scores gives the total score of the scale. Lower total and subscale scores represent a better outcome.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Mean change from baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Psychometric scale to evaluate anxiety symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 56 with the following classification: 0-16 mild anxiety symptoms, 17-24 mild to moderate anxiety symptoms, 25-30 moderate to severe anxiety symptoms, and >= 31 severe anxiety symptoms. Lower total scores represent a better outcome.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Mean change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Psychometric scale to evaluate depression symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with the following classification: 0-7 no symptoms, 8-16 mild depression symptoms, 17-23 moderate depression symptoms, and >= 24 severe depression symptoms. Lower total scores represent a better outcome.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Mean change from baseline in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Psychometric scale to evaluate anxiety symptoms. The total score ranges from 40 to 160 with the following classification: 40-76 sub-clinical symptoms, >= 78 clinical symptoms. This scale can be divided into two subscales: state anxiety subscale (score ranging from 20 to 80) and trait anxiety subscale (score ranging from 20 to 80). The sum of the subscales scores gives the total score of the scale. Lower total and subscale scores represent a better outcome.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Mean change from baseline in the score of Perceived Stress Scale with 10 items.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Psychometric scale to evaluate perceived stress symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Lower total scores represent a better outcome.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Mean change from baseline in Emotion Regulation Questionnaire score.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.
Psychometric scale to evaluate cognitive regulation and emotional suppression capabilities. The cognitive regulation subscale score ranges from 6 to 42 and the emotional suppression subscale score ranges from 4 to 28. Lower emotional suppression scores and higher cognitive regulation scores represent a better outcome.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference from baseline in functional connectivity patterns in the brain.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention
Functional connectivity maps will be obtained with resting state functional MRI sequences to study changes in brain function induced by the intervention, mainly in regions associated with the target region - the orbitofrontal cortex.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention
Differences from baseline in brain grey and white matter structure.
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention
Diffusion tensor imaging and anatomical MRI sequences will be applied to assess brain white matter integrity and gray matter morphology, respectively.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention
Mean change from baseline in blood hormonal composition
Time Frame: 2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention
Hemogram and measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone, cortisol, glucose, and adrenocorticotropic hormone levels in the blood.
2-3 days before the intervention, 2-3 days after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pedro Morgado

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hospital de Braga
Clinical Academic Center (2CA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pedro Morgado, M.D., Ph.D., Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho; ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory; Braga, Portugal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OCDNF_ICVS2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings