Microbiome/Peptidome-based Model for Non-invasive Detection of High-risk Gastroesophageal Varices in Compensated Cirrhosis (CHESS1901/APPHA1901)

August 16, 2021 updated by: Xiaolong Qi, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Microbiome/Peptidome-based Model for Non-invasive Detection of High-risk Gastroesophageal Varices in Compensated Cirrhosis (CHESS1901/APPHA1901): A Prospective Multicenter Study

Variceal hemorrhage is a lethal complication in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Identification of varices needing treatment in compensated cirrhosis is, therefore, of great therapeutic and prognostic importance. The gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal varices and evaluating the risk of variceal hemorrhage is esophagogastroduodenoscopy. According to the Baveno VI consensus, for those with high-risk varices (HRV), either non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic band ligation is recommended for the prevention of the first variceal bleeding. However, the invasiveness and uncomfortableness during the esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure has hindered its use in clinical practice, especially in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Sufficient accurate non-invasive tools for detection of HRV are warranted to safely avoid the use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Advanced technologies including next-generation sequencing and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry have the potential to be applied in this field. The latter is a widespread adopted tool in clinical microbiology for rapid, accurate and cost-effective identification of cultured bacteria and fungi. Recently, microbiome and peptidome have been proved their roles in the end-stage liver disease (e.g. cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma), which may exhibit predictive capacity of HRV. In the present study, the investigators aim to conduct a prospective, multicenter diagnostic trial in 12 sites in China, 1 site in Turkey and 1 site in Thailand to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the microbiome/peptidome-based model for HRV detection in compensated cirrhosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Variceal hemorrhage is a lethal complication in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Identification of varices needing treatment in compensated cirrhosis is, therefore, of great therapeutic and prognostic importance. The gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal varices and evaluating the risk of variceal hemorrhage is esophagogastroduodenoscopy. According to the Baveno VI consensus, for those with high-risk varices (HRV), either non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic band ligation is recommended for the prevention of the first variceal bleeding. However, the invasiveness and uncomfortableness during the esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure has hindered its use in clinical practice, especially in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Sufficient accurate non-invasive tools for detection of HRV are warranted to safely avoid the use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Advanced technologies including next-generation sequencing and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry have the potential to be applied in this field. The latter is a widespread adopted tool in clinical microbiology for rapid, accurate and cost-effective identification of cultured bacteria and fungi. Recently, microbiome and peptidome have been proved their roles in the end-stage liver disease (e.g. cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma), which may exhibit predictive capacity of HRV. In the present study, the investigators aim to conduct a prospective, multicenter diagnostic trial in 12 sites (The First Hospital of Lanzhou University; Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University; Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University; Xingtai People's Hospital; Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University; The Third People's Hospital affiliated to Jiangsu University; Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital; Tianjin Infectious Disease Hospital; Lishui Municipal Central Hospital; The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University; Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital; The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang) in China, 1 site (Ankara University School of Medicine) in Turkey and 1 site (King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital affiliated to Chulalongkorn University) in Thailand to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the microbiome/peptidome-based model for HRV detection in compensated cirrhosis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jun Ye, MD
    • Gansu
      • Lanzhou, Gansu, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Jinlin Hou, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jinlin Hou, MD
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Hua Mao, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hua Mao, MD
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xiaofeng Li, MD
    • Hebei
      • Xingtai, Hebei, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Xingtai People's Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jitao Wang, MD
        • Contact:
          • Qingge Zhang, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Qingge Zhang, MD
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University
      • Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Third Hospital of Zhenjiang Affiliated Jiangsu University
        • Contact:
          • Youwen Tan, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Youwen Tan, MD
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
        • Contact:
          • Yiying Song, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yiying Song, MD
    • Shanxi
      • Xi'an, Shanxi, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ying Song, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ying Song, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bojiang Zhang, MD
    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tianjin Second People's Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Lishui, Zhejiang, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Zhejiang University Lishui Hospital
        • Contact:
          • JianSong Ji, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jiansong Ji, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Zhongwei Zhao, MD
  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand
        • Not yet recruiting
        • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital affiliated to Chulalongkorn University
        • Contact:
          • Sombat Treeprasertsuk, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sombat Treeprasertsuk, MD
  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Ankara University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Necati Örmeci, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Necati Örmeci, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with compensated cirrhosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-75 years;
  • confirmed compensated cirrhosis based on liver biopsy or clinical findings;
  • without decompensated events (e.g. ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy);
  • scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy;
  • estimated survival time> 24 months, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score< 19, and without liver transplant;
  • with written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contradictions for esophagogastroduodenoscopy;
  • use of antibiotics, prebiotics, probiotics and proton pump inhibitors within 3 months upon recruitment.
  • pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Overall eligible participants
Eligible participants will receive standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy and microbiome/peptidome examination.
Diagnostic test: esophagogastroduodenoscopy
standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of microbiome/peptidome-based model for high-risk varices
Time Frame: 1 day
Diagnostic performance of microbiome/peptidome-based model to determine the presence or absence of high-risk varices when compared with esophagogastroduodenoscopy as the reference standard
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of microbiome/peptidome-based model for decompensation or death
Time Frame: 3 years
Diagnostic performance of microbiome/peptidome-based model to determine the presence or absence of decompensation (defined as development of ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy) or death within 3-year follow-up
3 years
Diagnostic performance of microbiome/peptidome-based model for hepatic venous pressure gradient
Time Frame: 1 day
Diagnostic performance of microbiome/peptidome-based model to determine the level of hepatic venous pressure gradient
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
LanZhou University
Zhongda Hospital
Ankara University
Xingtai People's Hospital
Southern Medical University, China
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital
Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital
Tianjin Second People's Hospital
The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
The Third Hospital of Zhenjiang Affiliated Jiangsu University
Zhejiang University Lishui Hospital
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital affiliated to Chulalongkorn University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Hongwei Zhou, PhD, Southern Medical University, China

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 13, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 12, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHESS1901

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Compensated Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings