The Comparison of Two Crosslinked Hyaluronate for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain

May 26, 2020 updated by: SciVision Biotech Inc.

The Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between HYAJOINT Plus and Bioventus Durolane for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

The aim of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness between two BDDE-crosslinked hyaluronate, HYAJOINT Plus and Durolane, for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
142

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age from 35 to 85 years;
  2. radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade II to III;
  3. symptoms ≧6 months despite conservative treatments such as analgesics, NSAID and/or physical therapy;
  4. average knee pain score ≧30mm on 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) in recent one week;
  5. radiographic evidence of bilateral knee OA not reason for exclusion if VAS pain in contralateral knee <30mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. previous orthopedic surgery in the lower extremity;
  2. disabling osteoarthritis of hip or ankle;
  3. previous IAHA within 6 months;
  4. IA steroid or joint puncture within 3 months;
  5. characters of severe acute synovitis under ultrasound (US) examination, such as Grade 3 in suprapatellar synovitis (SPS), suprapatellar effusion (SPE), medial compartment synovitis (MCS) or lateral compartment synovitis (LCS);
  6. Any specific medical condition, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Lupus erythematous, hemiparesis, infection, neoplasm, and etc., that would interfere with assessments;
  7. confirmed or suspected pregnancy or lactating;
  8. known allergy history to any avian protein or HA product.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: HYAJOINT Plus
Device: HYAJOINT Plus
60 mg / 3 ml cross-linked hyaluronan, SciVision Biotech Inc.
Active Comparator: Durolane
Device: Durolane
60 mg / 3 ml cross-linked hyaluronan, Bioventus LLC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change from baseline VAS pain score at 6 months post-injection.
Time Frame: 6 months post-injection
The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'
6 months post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline VAS pain score at 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injection. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'
Baseline, 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Adverse events reported from the baseline and during the study period
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Likert scale score change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline WOMAC score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A 24-item questionnaire with 3 subscales measuring pain, stiffness, and physical function. Total score is 96 and lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for stiffness change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline VAS stiffness score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no stiffness' and '100' with 'worst stiffness'.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for satisfaction change
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline VAS satisfaction score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. Patients rate their treatment satisfaction based on a 100 mm VAS. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'least satisfaction' and '100' with 'highest satisfaction'.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline TUG time at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A simple measurement of time in seconds for a subject to rise from an armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Single-leg stance test (SLS) change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline SLS time at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A simple measurement of time in seconds for a subject raising one foot up without touching it to the supported lower extremity with knee OA and maintain balance for as long as possible.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Knee joint inflammatory state change by ultrasonic inspection
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline of the subject knee inflammatory state at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection through ultrasonic inspection.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
SciVision Biotech Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RDCT-CKHP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings