The Comparison of Two Crosslinked Hyaluronate for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain

May 26, 2020 updated by: SciVision Biotech Inc.

The Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between HYAJOINT Plus and Bioventus Durolane for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

The aim of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness between two BDDE-crosslinked hyaluronate, HYAJOINT Plus and Durolane, for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age from 35 to 85 years;
  2. radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade II to III;
  3. symptoms ≧6 months despite conservative treatments such as analgesics, NSAID and/or physical therapy;
  4. average knee pain score ≧30mm on 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) in recent one week;
  5. radiographic evidence of bilateral knee OA not reason for exclusion if VAS pain in contralateral knee <30mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. previous orthopedic surgery in the lower extremity;
  2. disabling osteoarthritis of hip or ankle;
  3. previous IAHA within 6 months;
  4. IA steroid or joint puncture within 3 months;
  5. characters of severe acute synovitis under ultrasound (US) examination, such as Grade 3 in suprapatellar synovitis (SPS), suprapatellar effusion (SPE), medial compartment synovitis (MCS) or lateral compartment synovitis (LCS);
  6. Any specific medical condition, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Lupus erythematous, hemiparesis, infection, neoplasm, and etc., that would interfere with assessments;
  7. confirmed or suspected pregnancy or lactating;
  8. known allergy history to any avian protein or HA product.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HYAJOINT Plus
60 mg / 3 ml cross-linked hyaluronan, SciVision Biotech Inc.
Active Comparator: Durolane
60 mg / 3 ml cross-linked hyaluronan, Bioventus LLC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change from baseline VAS pain score at 6 months post-injection.
Time Frame: 6 months post-injection
The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'
6 months post-injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline VAS pain score at 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injection. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'
Baseline, 1, 3, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Adverse events reported from the baseline and during the study period
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Likert scale score change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline WOMAC score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A 24-item questionnaire with 3 subscales measuring pain, stiffness, and physical function. Total score is 96 and lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for stiffness change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline VAS stiffness score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no stiffness' and '100' with 'worst stiffness'.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Visual analog scale (VAS) score for satisfaction change
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline VAS satisfaction score at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. Patients rate their treatment satisfaction based on a 100 mm VAS. The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'least satisfaction' and '100' with 'highest satisfaction'.
1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline TUG time at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A simple measurement of time in seconds for a subject to rise from an armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Single-leg stance test (SLS) change
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline SLS time at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection. A simple measurement of time in seconds for a subject raising one foot up without touching it to the supported lower extremity with knee OA and maintain balance for as long as possible.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
Knee joint inflammatory state change by ultrasonic inspection
Time Frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection
The change from baseline of the subject knee inflammatory state at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection through ultrasonic inspection.
Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on HYAJOINT Plus

Subscribe