Perioperative Epidural Block and Dexamethasone in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

July 30, 2025 updated by: Dong-Xin Wang, Peking University First Hospital

Effect of Perioperative Epidural Block and Dexamethasone on Outcome of Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: a 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

Pancreatic cancer remains a devastating disease with an average 5-year survival rate of about 3-5%. Previous retrospective studies showed that perioperative epidural block and/or dexamethasone are associated with improved outcome after cancer surgery. This randomized trial aims to investigate the effect of perioperative epidural block and/or dexamethasone on long-term survival in patients following pancreatic cancer surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, and is estimated to become the second one in 2030. For patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, radical surgery is the first-line therapy. However, the clinical outcomes remain poor even after radical resection, as the incidence of postoperative morbidity is up to 50% and the 5-year survival rate remains below 30%.

For patients undergoing major intraabdominal surgery, epidural block may provide advantages by blocking the afferent nociceptive stimuli, providing better pain relief, decreasing opioid consumption, and alleviating stress response. These effects may be helpful in preserving immune function. Some retrospective studies showed that epidural block is associated with delayed cancer recurrence/metastasis and improved survival after cancer surgery.

Low-dose dexamethasone is frequently used to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Recent evidences from retrospective studies suggest that perioperative dexamethasone may also affect long-term outcome after cancer surgery. For example, in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery, intraoperative dexamethasone is associated with improved recurrence-free and overall survival. Similar results are also reported in patients after pancreatic cancer surgery.

The investigators hypothesize that perioperative epidural block and dexamethasone may improve survival in patients after radical pancreatic surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether perioperative epidural block and/or dexamethasone can improve 2-year survival in patients after pancreatic cancer surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
260

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100034
        • Peking University First Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥45 and <90 years;
  2. Clinically diagnosed as resectable or possibly resectable pancreatic cancer and scheduled to undergo radical surgery;
  3. Agreed to receive epidural block and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia;
  4. Agreed to participate in the study and provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical evidence of unresectable pancreatic cancer or plan to undergo biopsy;
  2. Previous surgery for pancreatic cancer, scheduled to undergo resurgery for recurrence or metastasis;
  3. Complicated with primary malignant tumor in other organ(s), either previously or at present;
  4. Complicated with autoimmune diseases, receiving either glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressants before surgery;
  5. Unable to complete preoperative evaluation due to severe dementia, language barrier, coma, or end-stage diseases;
  6. Severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh C), severe renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >442 µmol/L or requirement of renal replacement therapy), or American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥V；
  7. Contradictions to epidural anesthesia, including spinal malformation, history of spinal surgery, coagulation disorder, suspected infection at the site of puncture, or severe low back pain;
  8. Other conditions that are considered unsuitable for study participation;
  9. Refused to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control
Patients in this group receive general anesthesia, without epidural block and perioperative dexamethasone. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia is provided after surgery.
Experimental: Epidural block
Patients in this group receive combined epidural-general anesthesia (0.375% ropivacaine for epidural block), without perioperative dexamethasone. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia is provided after surgery.
Other: Epidural block
Epidural block (with 0.375% ropivacaine) is performed during surgery. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (with a mixture of 0.12% ropivacaine and 0.5 microgram/ml sufentanyl) is provided after surgery.
Other Names:
  • Epidural anesthesia/analgesia
Experimental: Dexamethasone
Patients in this group receive dexamethasone (10 mg) before anesthesia induction and general anesthesia, without epidural block. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia is provided after surgery.
Drug: Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone (10 mg) is administered intravenously before anesthesia induction.
Other Names:
  • Glucocorticoids
Experimental: Epidural block+Dexamethasone
Patients this group receive dexamethasone (10 mg) before anesthesia induction and combined epidural-general anesthesia (0.375% ropivacaine for epidural block). Patient-controlled epidural analgesia is provided after surgery.
Other: Epidural block
Epidural block (with 0.375% ropivacaine) is performed during surgery. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (with a mixture of 0.12% ropivacaine and 0.5 microgram/ml sufentanyl) is provided after surgery.
Other Names:
  • Epidural anesthesia/analgesia
Drug: Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone (10 mg) is administered intravenously before anesthesia induction.
Other Names:
  • Glucocorticoids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 2 years after surgery.
2-year overall survival
Up to 2 years after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay in hospital after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
Length of stay in hospital after surgery.
Up to 30 days after surgery.
Postoperative gastrointestinal complications.
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
Rate of postoperative gastrointestinal complications.
Up to 30 days after surgery.
Overall postoperative complications.
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
Rate of overall postoperative complications.
Up to 30 days after surgery.
All-cause 30-day mortality.
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
Rate of all-cause 30-day mortality.
Up to 30 days after surgery.
Quality of life in 1- and 2-year survivors.
Time Frame: At the end of the first and second year after surgery.
Quality of life is assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionaire (EORTC QLQ)-PAN26. It is a 26-item questionnaire that evaluates 9 symptoms and 5 emotional difficulties related to pancreatic cancer. Each item is scaled 0-100. High scores indicate worse symptoms and poorer quality of life.
At the end of the first and second year after surgery.
Hospital readmission within 2 years after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to 2 years after surgery.
Rate of hospital readmission within 2 years after surgery.
Up to 2 years after surgery.
2-year progression-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 2 years after surgery.
Cancer progression is evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline version 1.1.
Up to 2 years after surgery.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective sleep quality: Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: Between 8-10 am on the first, second, and third days after surgery.
Subjective sleep quality is assessed with a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0 indicates the best sleep and 10 the worst sleep).
Between 8-10 am on the first, second, and third days after surgery.
Pain severity (at rest and with movement): Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: Between 8-10 am on the first, second, and third days after surgery.
Pain severity is assessed with a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, an 11-point scale where 0 indicates no pain and 10 the worst pain).
Between 8-10 am on the first, second, and third days after surgery.
Time to ambulation after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
Time to ambulation after surgery.
Up to 30 days after surgery.
Time to oral intake after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
Time to oral intake after surgery.
Up to 30 days after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University First Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD, Peking University First Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 22, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-99

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Epidural block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings