The Sensitivity of Traditional Chinese Medical Diagnostic Tools for Diabetic Retinopathy Diabetic retinopathy-a Pilot Study

July 22, 2019 updated by: China Medical University Hospital

Assessment the Sensitivity of Traditional Chinese Medical Diagnostic Tools for Diabetic retinopathy-a Pilot Study

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of impaired visual function and blindness in adults. The fundus photographs were examined to detect DR. The DR severity was graded non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema Disease Severity Scales. The pathogenesis of DR is complex and not fully understood, and platelet aggregation, microvascular damage, microvascular enlargement, leakage, hemorrhage, or obstruction, resulting in retinal hypoxia and retinal neovascularization. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) diagnostic tools are non-invasive and convenient. This study apply TCM diagnostic tools for clinical diseases, providing objective diagnostic data for evaluation to assess the association of blood stasis and DR. Furtherly we would evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of TCM diagnostic tools.

This study is a prospective cross-sectional study. We enroll participants form the department of Chinese medicine, China Medical University Hospital. In total, 100 participants , composed of 50 of type 2 diabetes and 50 of diabetic retinopathy, whom previously had a retinal examination. We apply tongue diagnosis system, pulse wave analysis, body constitution questionnaires, and nailfold capillaroscopy to assess the differences of TCM diagnosis in DR.

This study aims to identify the clinical symptoms of DR with TCM diagnostic tools and investigate the pattern difference and treatment for DR. Furtherly, we could design a clinical trial with improving blood circulation to treat or prevent DR, and improve the health status and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants in this prospective cross-sectional study were recruited from the outpatient clinic of endocrinology in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • type 2 DM group were diagnosed with DM based on criteria recommended by the American Diabetes Association and required to have a fasting plasma glucose of ≥7mmol/L or an HbA1c of ≥6.5%, as measured on 2 separate occasions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cancer, active liver disease, current pregnancy, active infection, and cerebrovascular disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
control group
Participants in the type 2 DM group were diagnosed with DM based on criteria recommended by the American Diabetes Association and required to have a fasting plasma glucose of ≥7mmol/L or an HbA1c of ≥6.5%, as measured on 2 separate occasions.
Diagnostic test: tongue diagnosis system
This study apply TCM diagnostic tools for clinical diseases, providing objective diagnostic data for evaluation to assess the association of blood stasis and DR.
Other Names:
  • pulse wave analysis
  • body constitution questionnaires
  • nailfold capillaroscopy
diabetic retinopahty group
Participants in th ediabetic retinopahty group group were diagnosed according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema Disease Severity Scales.
Diagnostic test: tongue diagnosis system
This study apply TCM diagnostic tools for clinical diseases, providing objective diagnostic data for evaluation to assess the association of blood stasis and DR.
Other Names:
  • pulse wave analysis
  • body constitution questionnaires
  • nailfold capillaroscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Automatic tongue diagnosis
Time Frame: 12 months
We observe the tongue features of blood stasis, such as bluish tongue, petechiae, and engorged sublingual vessels, and compare the relationship between diabetic retinopathy and blood stasis.
12 months
body constitution questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
We observe the body constitution questionnaires, such as yi deficiency, yang deficiency and phlegm-stasis, and compare the relationship between diabetic retinopathy and blood stasis.
12 months
Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC)
Time Frame: 12 months
We evaluate the capillary density, length, morphology, distribution, presence of enlarged loops or hemorrhages, and blood flow. NVC score was used to quantitate the aforementioned characteristics.
12 months
pulse examinatin
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
China Medical University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CMUH107-REC3--116

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trials on tongue diagnosis system

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings