Artificial Intelligence Versus Expert Endoscopists for Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

November 19, 2019 updated by: Ryota Niikura, Tokyo University

A Single-center, Retrospective, Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial of Artificial Intelligence Versus Expert Endoscopists for Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer in Patients Who Underwent Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Title: A single-center, retrospective randomized controlled trial of artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert endoscopists for diagnosis of gastric cancer in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Précis: this single-center, retrospective randomized controlled trial will include 500 outpatients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for gastric cancer screening and will compare the diagnostic detection rate for gastric cancer of AI and expert endoscopists.

Objectives Primary Objective: to evaluate the diagnostic detection rate for gastric cancer of AI and expert endoscopists.

Secondary Objectives: to determine whether AI is not inferior to expert endoscopists in terms of the number of images analyzed for diagnosis of gastric cancer and intersection over union (IOU), and the detection rate of diagnosis of early and advanced gastric cancer.

Endpoints Primary Endpoint: diagnosis of gastric cancer. Secondary Endpoints: image based diagnosis of gastric cancer and IOU. Population: in total, 500 males and females aged ≥ 20 years who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for screening of gastric cancer at a single hospital in Japan.

Describe the Intervention: AI-based diagnosis of gastric cancer based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images.

Study Duration: 3 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Prior to Study: Total 500: Screen potential subjects by inclusion and exclusion criteria; obtain endoscopy images.

Randomization was performed.

Intervention: AI diagnosis was performed for 250 patients using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images, and Expert endoscopists diagnosis was performed for 250 patients by same methods.

Primary analysis: Perform primary analysis of primary and secondary endpoints for 250 patients in each group

Cross over diagnosis between AI and expert endoscopists was performed.

Perform secondary analysis of agreement of gastric cancer diagnosis per images and IOU between AI and expert endoscopists for 500 patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Tokyo, Japan, 1138655
        • Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females aged ≥ 20 years who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at Tokyo University Hospital during 2018.
  2. Informed optout consent, obtained from each patient before completion of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who underwent gastrectomy.
  2. Patients who underwent transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AI-based diagnosis
• AI-based diagnosis will be performed based on analysis of endoscopic images (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). The investigators will use the Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), a deep neural network architecture (https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02325), and an optimal diagnostic cutoff from a prior report2. The AI system reviewed endoscopy images and reported those in which gastric cancer was detected, together with the coordinates (X, Y) of the lesions.
Diagnostic test: AI-based diagnosis
AI-based diagnosis will be performed based on analysis of endoscopic images (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). The investigators will use the Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), a deep neural network architecture (https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02325), and an optimal diagnostic cutoff from a prior report2. The AI system reviewed endoscopy images and reported those in which gastric cancer was detected, together with the coordinates (X, Y) of the lesions.
Active Comparator: Expert endoscopist diagnosis
The expert endoscopists are two physicians with experience of more than 20,000 endoscopies. The expert endoscopists will review the endoscopy images of each patient for 5 min. They will then report endoscopy images in which gastric cancer was detected and manually annotate the lesions in those images.
Diagnostic test: The expert endoscopists-based diagnosis
The expert endoscopists are two physicians with experience of more than 20,000 endoscopies. The expert endoscopists will review the endoscopy images of each patient for 5 min. They will then report endoscopy images in which gastric cancer was detected and manually annotate the lesions in those images.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Per patient diagnosis of gastric cancer
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks from study start
Number of Participants
Up to 6 weeks from study start

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of images analyzed for diagnosis of gastric cancer
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks from study start
Number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images
Up to 6 weeks from study start
Intersection over union (IOU) of gastric lesions
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks from study start
A value between 0 and 1
Up to 6 weeks from study start
Diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks from study start
Number of Participants diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer
Up to 6 weeks from study start
Diagnosis of early gastric cancer
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks from study start
Number of Participants diagnosed with early gastric cancer
Up to 6 weeks from study start
Agreement on image and IOU based diagnosis of gastric cancer between AI and expert endoscopists
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks from study start
Number of images and IOU value (between 0 and 1)
Up to 12 weeks from study start

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tokyo University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ryota Niikura, MD, Tokyo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 16, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 31, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 11931-(1)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on AI-based diagnosis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings