EPstein-barr Virus DNA Response to Systemic Therapy for Treatment Adaptation in High Risk NPC (EP-STAR) (EP-STAR)

June 16, 2023 updated by: Ying Sun, Sun Yat-sen University

Epstein-Barr Virus DNA to Systemic Therapy for Treatment Adaptation in High Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (EP-STAR Trial) A Phase II, Multi-center, Biomarker-guided, Umbrella Trial

The investigators aim to investigate whether incorporating on-treatment EBV DNA surveillance for monitoring tumor responses to treatment and for guiding individuliased treatment adaptation can improve prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient . For patients with detectable EBV DNA after one cycle of IC, which then drops to undetectable levels during the following IC cycles (intermediate responders/intermediate relapse risk), the investigators aim to investigate whether additional adjuvant metronomic capecitabine would benefit this subgroup. For patients with detectable EBV DNA after three cycles of IC or with EBV DNA bounce during the induction phase (insensitive to IC/high relapse risk), the investigators aim to investigate whether concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 therapy during the following treatment phases (including concurrent phase and adjuvant phase) can benefit this subgroup.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a unique head and neck cancer characterized by an extremely unbalanced global distribution. The highest incidence is observed in endemic regions, such as southern China and Southeast Asia, with an age-standardized rate of 3.0 per 100,000 in China to 0.4 per 100,000 in Caucasian populations. The fast progress of modern imaging and the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has improved the local control rate significantly. Distant metastasis has become the major cause of treatment failure.

The 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommends concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) ± induction chemotherapy (IC)/adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) as the standard treatment for stage II-IVa disease (category 2A). While it is worth noting that there is extensive heterogeneity among patients with NPC, and even among patients with the same disease stage, the risk of relapse varies. More importantly, patients can have differing sensitivity to RT and chemotherapy. The abovementioned reasons result in over-treatment in some patients with relatively low relapse risk; intensive treatments lead to unnecessary toxicities, and greatly affect quality of life (QoL). On the other hand, the current treatment strategy may be not optimal for patients with high relapse risk or who are not sensitive to traditional chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, there is an urgent need for identifying and applying promising biomarkers, real-time monitoring of patient responses to treatment, predicting relapse risk, and guiding real-time treatment adaptation for individualized therapy.

The investigators aim to investigate whether incorporating on-treatment EBV DNA surveillance for monitoring tumor responses to treatment and for guiding individuliased treatment adaptation can improve prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient . For patients with detectable EBV DNA after one cycle of IC, which then drops to undetectable levels during the following IC cycles (intermediate responders/intermediate relapse risk), the investigators aim to investigate whether additional adjuvant metronomic capecitabine would benefit this subgroup. For patients with detectable EBV DNA after three cycles of IC or with EBV DNA bounce during the induction phase (insensitive to IC/high relapse risk), the investigators aim to investigate whether concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 therapy during the following treatment phases (including concurrent phase and adjuvant phase) can benefit this subgroup.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed, pathologically proven World Health Organization (WHO) type II/III untreated LANPC;
  2. LANPC (except T3N0, according to the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC clinical staging system);
  3. Age at diagnosis: 18-65 years;
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score: 0-1
  5. Receiving recommended three cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) (gemcitabine-cisplatin [GP] regimen);
  6. Pre-treatment and post-IC1 cell-free Epstein-Barr virus (cfEBV) DNA > 0 copy/mL; systemic cfEBV DNA monitoring during IC phase for risk stratification;
  7. Normal hematic, liver, and kidney function: hemoglobin (HG) > 90 g/L; neutrophil > 1.5 × 109/L; platelet > 100 × 109/L; total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 2.5 × ULN; alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5 × ULN; creatinine clearance (Ccr) ≥ 60 mL/min;
  8. Female subjects capable of becoming pregnant agree to use reliable contraceptive measures from screening to 1 year after treatment;
  9. Patients will be required to sign informed consent forms and be willing and able to comply with the requirements for visits, treatment, laboratory tests, and other research requirements stipulated in the research schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Receiving surgery, target therapy, and/or immunotherapy during or before induction phase;
  2. Hepatitis B surface antigen-positive [HBsAg(+)],hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA > 1×103 copy/mL; hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody(+);
  3. Other previous or concurrent malignant tumors, except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, cervical carcinoma in situ, and thyroid papillary cancer;
  4. Pregnant or lactating women (a pregnancy test should be considered for fertile women with an active sex life);
  5. Previously treated with radical radiotherapy (RT), except non-melanoma skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume;

  6. Uncontrolled heart disease, e.g.: 1) Heart failure, Hew York Heart Association (NYHA) level ≥ 2; 2) unstable angina; 3) myocardial infarction in the past 1 year; 4) supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmia requiring treatment or intervention;

    *For patients recruited to Arm II, the additional exclusion criteria are:

  7. Active, known, or suspected autoimmune disease (including, but not limited to, uveitis, enteritis, hepatitis, pituitary, nephritis, vasculitis, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and asthma requiring bronchiectasis). Exceptions are type I diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism requiring hormone replacement therapy, and skin disorders requiring no systemic treatment (e.g., vitiligo, psoriasis, alopecia);
  8. Received live vaccine within 1 month before treatment initiation;
  9. Allergy to macromolecular protein preparations, or any component of sintilimab;
  10. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive or diagnosed with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm I
Patients receive GP IC + IMRT concurrent with cisplatin chemotherapy + capecitabine AC. All patients will receive concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2) every 3 weeks, in a total of three cycles. All patients will receive low-dose metronomic capecitabine (650 mg/m2 bid, oral, d1-21, q3w) until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity or 6 months.
Drug: Capecitabine
Investigate whether capecitabine would be able to improve prognosis in patients at intermediate risk groups
Experimental: Arm II
Patients receive GP IC + IMRT concurrent with cisplatin chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy (sintilimab) + anti-PD-1 therapy (sintilimab) AC. All patients will receive concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and sintilimab (200 mg, IV drop 30-60 min) every 3 weeks in a total of three cycles. All patients will receive adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy (sintilimab, 200 mg, IV drop 30-60 min, q3w) in a total of nine cycles until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity or 6 months.
Drug: sintilimab
Investigate whether capecitabine would be able to improve prognosis in patients at high risk groups

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure-free survival
Time Frame: 2 year
FFS will be measured from the day of enrollment until treatment failure, death from any cause, or the last follow-up visit, whichever occurred first.
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: 2 year
measured from the day of enrollment until death due to any cause, or the last follow-up visit.
2 year
Distant metastasis failure-free survival
Time Frame: 2 year
measured from the day of enrollment until death until distant metastasis , or the last follow-up visit.
2 year
Locoregional failure-free survival
Time Frame: 2 year
measured from the day of enrollment until death until local and/or regional recurrence, or the last follow-up visit.
2 year
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to 5 years
The incidence of immune-related and other adverse events
up to 5 years
Patient reported quality-of-life score
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Patient reported quality of life would be evaluated using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 module (QLQ-C30)
up to 2 years
Biomarker analysis
Time Frame: Through study completion
Exploratory biomarker analysis that would be able to predict patient treatment benefits, for example PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, etc.
Through study completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-sen University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital
First People's Hospital of Foshan
National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ying Sun, M.D., Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B2019-185-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Currently, there is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Capecitabine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings