Phase II Trial of XP Versus XG in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

December 28, 2015 updated by: Jeeyun Lee, Samsung Medical Center

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin (XP) Versus Capecitabine Plus Genexol (XG) as a First-line Treatment for Advanced or Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Until today, the 5-FU/cisplatin combination is the reference regimen with 30-45% response rates, which is most commonly used to treat patients with metastatic, recurrent or locally advanced, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Because the classical dose schedule of this two-drug combination is cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 96-120 hr, prolonged administration time and mucosal toxicity are inconvenient to the patients with the aim of palliation. Capecitabine, which is oral prodrug of 5-FU and mimic continuously-infused 5-FU, is being investigated in phase I, II and III trials for the treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers, primarily in the first-line metastatic setting but also in the adjuvant setting. In the investigators experience, capecitabine plus cisplatin combination (XP) as a first-line treatment for 45 patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma demonstrated a promising anti-tumor activity with 57% of response rate and showed tolerable toxicity with convenience.

Paclitaxel has been also investigated as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. A Dutch phase II study demonstrated that paclitaxel combination with carboplatin had shown an encouraging confirmed response rate of 59% with 51 patients with resectable esophageal cancer in neoadjuvant setting. Another Dutch phase II study showed 43% of response rate including 4% of CR with 8 months of response duration when paclitaxel plus cisplatin administration was given for patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Although recently first-line palliative chemotherapy regimen in esophageal cancer has been investigated, many trials have failed to show superiority to 5-FU/cisplatin combination. Since the investigators considered that XP or XG (genexol) is more effective and convenient chemotherapy regimen than 5-FU/cisplatin, this randomized phase II study was planned to compare XP with XG in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologically confirmed metastatic, or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  • Age > 18 years
  • ECOG performance status 0 - 2
  • At least one measurable lesion(s) by RECIST criteria
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
  • No prior palliative chemotherapy
  • Patients may have received prior adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU with cisplatin as long as it has been 6months since completion of regimen.
  • Adequate bone marrow function (≥ ANC 1,500/ul, ≥ platelet 100,000/ul, ≥ Hb 9.0 g/dl)
  • Adequate renal function (≤ serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dl or CCr ≥ 50 ml/min)
  • Adequate liver function (≤ serum bilirubin 1.5 mg/dl, ≤ AST/ALT x 3 UNL)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other tumor type than squamous cell carcinoma
  • CNS metastasis
  • Contraindication to any drug contained in the chemotherapy regimen
  • Previous adjuvant treatment with 5-FU, cisplstin, capecitabine or paclitaxel finished less than 1 year6 months
  • Evidence of serious gastrointestinal bleeding
  • History of another malignancy within the last five years except cured
  • basal cell carcinoma of skin and cured carcinoma in-situ of uterine cervix
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease
  • Serious pulmonary conditions/illness
  • Serious metabolic disease such as severe non-compensated diabetes mellitus
  • History of significant neurologic or psychiatric disorders
  • Serious uncontrolled intercurrent infections, or other serious uncontrolled concomitant disease
  • Positive serology for the HIV
  • Pregnancy, breast feeding patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Capecitabine/Cisplatin(XP)
Capecitabine AND Cisplatin
Capecitabine/Cisplatin(XP) D1-D14 Capecitabine 2000mg/m2 D#2 PO D1 Cisplatin 75mg/m2 iv q 3 weeks
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Capecitabine/Paditaxel(XG)
Capecitabine + Paditaxel(genexol)
Capecitabine/Paditaxel(XG) D1-D14 Capecitabine 2000mg/m2 D#2 PO D1,D8 Paditaxel(genexol) 80mg/m2 iv q 3 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
response rate
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
progression free survival
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
overall survival
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of Adverse Event
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
predictive marker
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced or Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Capecitabine/Cisplatin(XP)

Subscribe