UrApp for Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Management (Incident Cohort)

October 20, 2025 updated by: Chia-shi Wang, Emory University

A Pilot Trial of UrApp, a Novel Mobile Application for Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Management

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. Patients suffer from frequent disease relapses and complications. Self-management is difficult for families and nonadherence is common, with adverse effects on the children's health. UrApp is a mobile application designed to assist families with nephrotic syndrome management. This study will examine whether providing the children's caregivers (or adolescent patients) with UrApp improves self-management and disease outcomes. This study will include 60 caregivers of children with newly diagnosed nephrotic syndrome. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to UrApp or standard of care and followed for 1 year.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children, with a prevalence of approximately 16 cases per 100,000 children. NS is characterized by heavy urinary losses of protein leading to hypoalbuminemia, edema, and hyperlipidemia. Children are treated with high-dose corticosteroids on presentation, and >80% respond to treatment with resolution of proteinuria and symptoms. However, 80-90% of the children initially sensitive to corticosteroids will experience disease relapse, with more than half relapsing frequently or becoming dependent on corticosteroids to maintain remission. During a relapse, patients can suffer from anasarca, acute kidney injury, serious infections, or thromboembolic events.

Management of children with NS entails long-term outpatient surveillance and treatment. Home care includes the important standard-of-care task of urine monitoring to follow the relapsing-remitting nature of the disease. New proteinuria signals disease relapse before the development of overt symptoms such as edema. Thus, patients are instructed to alert their providers to the occurrence of proteinuria in a timely manner so that corticosteroids can be initiated or adjusted to treat each relapse and prevent acute disease complications. It is also important for the patients to track urine protein for resolution so that corticosteroids can be stopped or reduced to minimize steroid toxicity.

Not unlike other chronic, relapsing-remitting pediatric disorders, self-management is difficult for NS patients and their caregivers. Mobile health (mHealth) is a promising, rapidly growing field in disease management. In NS, there are numerous aspects of self-management that may be facilitated by a mobile app. First, the visual analysis of a urine test strip is subject to human error, including reading the wrong reagent block and erroneous assessments of color. This can be improved through using a smartphone's camera and computer to read and analyze test strip results. Second, caregivers must remember to check their child's urine, recall results, and understand what the results mean: the demands are taxing in that disease relapse is defined as urine protein ≥2+ for 3 consecutive days and remission is defined as negative/trace urine protein for 3 consecutive days. Apps, with their inherent interactivity, can provide reminders for urine testing, capture the results, and analyze trends to detect disease relapse/remission. Apps can alert a caregiver to seek medical attention and directly transmit test results to providers. Lastly, apps can provide medication reminders for NS patients, who are on highly complex medication regimens.

UrApp was iteratively developed by an expert panel of two pediatric nephrologists and three research engineers with expertise in human-computer interaction. App features were devised by the clinicians to support elements of chronic care management according to the Chronic Care Model and tasks that are challenging for caregivers. This study will include 60 caregivers of children with newly diagnosed nephrotic syndrome. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to UrApp or standard of care and followed for 1 year. In addition to the study outcome measures, user feedback will be collected via survey, interview, and by stakeholder meetings to inform app refinement.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Children's Healthcare of Altanta
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55454
        • University of Minnesota Children's Hospital
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers of patients ages 1-17 with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (clinical diagnosis with edema, nephrotic range proteinuria [urine protein to creatinine ratio >2 mg/mg, or ≥ 300 mg/dL or ≥ 3+ protein on urine dipstick], and hypoalbuminemia ≤ 2.5 g/dL; resolution of proteinuria [negative/trace protein on urine dipstick] within 4 weeks of corticosteroid treatment)
  • Caregivers of pediatric patients with steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome diagnosed within 42 days at the time of enrollment
  • Access to internet/wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) in the home
  • Caregiver proficiency with the English language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers of pediatric patients with end-stage kidney disease
  • Caregivers of pediatric patients with renal transplantation
  • Caregivers of pediatric patients with clinical or histologic evidence of secondary nephrotic syndrome (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: UrApp
Participants randomized to this study arm will use the UrApp mobile application for one year, in addition to receiving the standard of care.
Behavioral: Standard of Care
Participants will be provided a folder of educational material on NS, including general information on symptoms, treatments, and possible complications; healthy diet for children taking corticosteroids; and low sodium diet. Site research staff will demonstrate how to check urine for protein with test strips, and educate patients on the definitions of disease relapse and remission. Urine test strips and urine protein logs will be provided to ensure that each participant can check their urine daily for protein. Participants will be instructed to check their urine daily for protein and call their provider within 1 business day for relapses and remissions.
Behavioral: UrApp
Caregivers/parents will download UrApp at the baseline visit. UrApp contains instructional videos to guide users. The telephone number of the patient's provider will be entered into UrApp and participants will be able to call their providers directly through UrApp. The email address of the Emory study staff will also be entered. UrApp will automatically e-mail test results to the research staff when elected by the users. Participants will be asked by study staff, and reminded by the app, to call their providers and send urine testing results to the study staff whenever there is a relapse or remission. When the study staff receives alerts of a relapse/remission via UrApp, the information will be communicated to the treating physician within 1 business day.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Participants randomized to this study arm will use receive the standard of care for one year.
Behavioral: Standard of Care
Participants will be provided a folder of educational material on NS, including general information on symptoms, treatments, and possible complications; healthy diet for children taking corticosteroids; and low sodium diet. Site research staff will demonstrate how to check urine for protein with test strips, and educate patients on the definitions of disease relapse and remission. Urine test strips and urine protein logs will be provided to ensure that each participant can check their urine daily for protein. Participants will be instructed to check their urine daily for protein and call their provider within 1 business day for relapses and remissions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Adherence to medications is evaluated via caregiver survey with the validated 4-question Morisky, Green, and Levine (MGL) Adherence Scale. Response options are Yes (0) or No (1) and total scores range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating better medication adherence. Adherence will be defined as a score of ≥3 on the MGL scale.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Number of Participants Reporting Adherence With Urine Monitoring
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Caregiver adherence with urine protein monitoring is assessed by asking caregivers on average how often they checked their child's urine for protein over the past month. Possible responses are "once a week", "2-4 times a week" or " 5-7 times a week." Adherence is defined as checking urine at least 2 times per week.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caregiver Self-efficacy Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Self-efficacy of caregivers for managing nephrotic syndrome of pediatric patients is assessed with a 3-item instrument adapted from the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales. Responses are given on a 10-point scale where 0 = not confident at all and 10 = totally confident. Total scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating increased self-efficacy.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score for Parents
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
The 23-item PedsQL was developed as part of the NIH Roadmap Initiative to create universal measures for patient-reported outcomes and contains questions in the domains of social-peer, depression, anxiety, mobility, and function. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = almost always. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher total mean scores indicate a better quality of life.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Score for Pediatric Patients
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
The 23-item PedsQL was developed as part of the NIH Roadmap Initiative to create universal measures for patient-reported outcomes, and contains questions in the domains of social-peer, depression, anxiety, mobility, and function. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = almost always. Items are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher total mean scores indicate a better quality of life.
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
Number Pediatric Patients With Delayed Detection of Relapses
Time Frame: Month 6, Month 12
Relapses detected only after patients experienced symptoms of relapse, indicating delayed detection, is compared between study arms. Patient medical charts were reviewed for occurrence and frequency of delayed relapse reporting which is defined as a relapse that was not reported to the treating physician until clinical manifestations or complications occurred and/or only discovered during planned or unplanned visits or hospitalizations.
Month 6, Month 12
Number of Hospitalizations Among Pediatric Patients
Time Frame: Month 6, Month 12
Medical records were reviewed for the primary reason for admission and NS disease complications, such as bacterial peritonitis, septicemia, shock, blood clot(s), acute kidney injury, and seizures from hyponatremia or hypertension.
Month 6, Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Emory University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Chia-shi Wang, MD, MS, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00108912
  • 1K23DK118189-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be available for sharing, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available for sharing immediately following publication, with no end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be available for sharing with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to chia-shi.wang@emory.edu. To gain access, data requesters will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings