Effects of Motor Imagery in Pain Modulation and Median Nerve Mechanosensitive in Healthy Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 28922
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy
Exclusion Criteria:
- be under 18
- any pathology which provoke pain.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Action observation
The patients will observe a 25 minutes clip of neurodynamic exercises of the hand.
|
With a mirror glasses on, do the neurodynamic exercises with the non-dominant hand while the patient is looking at the dominant hand
active movement of the dominant hand.
Do neurodynamic exercises.
Execute a short strength training for the dominant hand
|
|
Experimental: Mirror Therapy
With a mirror glasses, the patients will execute neurodynamic movements of their non-dominant hand during 25 minutes.
|
active movement of the dominant hand.
Do neurodynamic exercises.
Execute a short strength training for the dominant hand
look at a clip of a hand doing neurodynamic exercises.
|
|
Active Comparator: Strength Training
Strength protocol for the dominant hand.
|
With a mirror glasses on, do the neurodynamic exercises with the non-dominant hand while the patient is looking at the dominant hand
active movement of the dominant hand.
Do neurodynamic exercises.
look at a clip of a hand doing neurodynamic exercises.
|
|
Experimental: Neurodynamic exercise
Active neurodynamic exercises for the dominant hand.
|
With a mirror glasses on, do the neurodynamic exercises with the non-dominant hand while the patient is looking at the dominant hand
Execute a short strength training for the dominant hand
look at a clip of a hand doing neurodynamic exercises.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Conditioned pain modulation
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
Diffused noxious inhibitory control system will be measure with tourniquet test
|
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
|
Pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
Three consecutive trials of pressure pain threshold on the active trigger point at a rate of 1 kg/sec at intervals of 30 seconds were conducted.
|
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
|
Cold hyperalgesia
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
10 seconds of a cold pack and after that, rating the pain from 0 to 10
|
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
|
Neural mechanosensitive
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
Upper Limb Neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1)
|
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Strength_grip
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
grip strength without pain
|
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
|
Imagine movement capacity
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
testing the capacity of imagine that their own body is movement. Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R questionaire). top score 56 and bottom score 8. The higher values indicates a better outcome. |
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
|
Psychological factors_Anxiety
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T).
Top score 60 and bottom score 0. The higher values indicate worst outcomes.
|
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
|
Psychological factors_Depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). the scores goes from 0 to 63. The higher values indicate worst outcomes. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) |
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
|
Psychological factors_Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.
Total scores goes from 11 to 44.The higher values indicate worst outcomes.
|
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2703201906919
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.