LS301 Uptake in Tumors of Patients Undergoing Liver, Pancreas, or Gastric Surgery

December 1, 2021 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Evaluation of LS301 Uptake in Tumors of Patients Undergoing Liver, Pancreas, or Gastric Surgery

The preclinical data have demonstrated the feasibility of fluorescence-guided tumor resection by the Cancer Vision Googles (CVG) with LS301 in animal models. In this study, the investigators will conduct intraoperative imaging procedures that have minimal interference with ongoing surgery. The underlying hypothesis is that the accurate detection of all cancer cells highlighted by LS301 during surgery will reduce the number of patients with margin positivity to less than 5%, compared to the current surgical paradigm of greater than 15% in pancreatic cancer, for example. The pilot study will obtain critical data required to address the larger question of surgical margin assessment in a full Phase I clinical trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed patients with gastrointestinal cancers, including pancreas, liver, gastric cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and metastatic cancers undergoing surgical resection as standard of care treatment.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • For the first cohort of patients enrolled, must have an ECG with no prolonged intervals.
  • Able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for surgery.
  • Receiving any investigational agents.
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to ICG or other agents used in the study, include known iodide or seafood allergy. We do not expect many of these adverse reactions with LS301 because it is not radioactive and does not possess iodinated counterions.
  • Presence of underlying lung disease.
  • Pregnant. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test no more than 7 days before start of participation.
  • Breastfeeding. Patients who are breastfeeding are excluded from this study because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with LS301.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Phase I: LS301 Dose Level 1 (0.05 mg/kg)
  • The patient will undergo intravenous injection of LS301 4-24 hours prior to surgery.
  • The operating surgeon will conduct surgery as usual without using a device to visualize LS301 fluorescence. To prevent bias in data acquisition, a second surgeon will wear the CVG at the completion of the surgery to examine the excised tissue at the surgical margins and the surgical resection bed.
  • The operating surgeon will remain blinded to the fluorescence images throughout the operation. The examining surgeon will wear the CVG and image all six anatomical aspects (superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, medial and lateral) of the surgical specimen as well as the surgical cavity for LS301 fluorescence.
Drug: LS301
-LS301 is produced at the Optical Radiology Laboratory at Washington University School of Medicine
Device: Cancer Vision Goggles
-Non-significant risk device
Other Names:
  • CVG
EXPERIMENTAL: Phase I: LS301 Dose Level 2 (0.075 mg/kg)
  • The patient will undergo intravenous injection of LS301 4-24 hours prior to surgery.
  • The operating surgeon will conduct surgery as usual without using a device to visualize LS301 fluorescence. To prevent bias in data acquisition, a second surgeon will wear the CVG at the completion of the surgery to examine the excised tissue at the surgical margins and the surgical resection bed.
  • The operating surgeon will remain blinded to the fluorescence images throughout the operation. The examining surgeon will wear the CVG and image all six anatomical aspects (superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, medial and lateral) of the surgical specimen as well as the surgical cavity for LS301 fluorescence.
Drug: LS301
-LS301 is produced at the Optical Radiology Laboratory at Washington University School of Medicine
Device: Cancer Vision Goggles
-Non-significant risk device
Other Names:
  • CVG
EXPERIMENTAL: Phase I: LS301 Dose Level 3 (0.1 mg/kg)
  • The patient will undergo intravenous injection of LS301 4-24 hours prior to surgery.
  • The operating surgeon will conduct surgery as usual without using a device to visualize LS301 fluorescence. To prevent bias in data acquisition, a second surgeon will wear the CVG at the completion of the surgery to examine the excised tissue at the surgical margins and the surgical resection bed.
  • The operating surgeon will remain blinded to the fluorescence images throughout the operation. The examining surgeon will wear the CVG and image all six anatomical aspects (superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, medial and lateral) of the surgical specimen as well as the surgical cavity for LS301 fluorescence.
Drug: LS301
-LS301 is produced at the Optical Radiology Laboratory at Washington University School of Medicine
Device: Cancer Vision Goggles
-Non-significant risk device
Other Names:
  • CVG
EXPERIMENTAL: Phase II: LS301 Dose determined in Phase I
  • The patient will undergo intravenous injection of LS301 4-24 hours prior to surgery.
  • The operating surgeon will conduct surgery as usual without using a device to visualize LS301 fluorescence. To prevent bias in data acquisition, a second surgeon will wear the CVG at the completion of the surgery to examine the excised tissue at the surgical margins and the surgical resection bed.
  • The operating surgeon will remain blinded to the fluorescence images throughout the operation. The examining surgeon will wear the CVG and image all six anatomical aspects (superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, medial and lateral) of the surgical specimen as well as the surgical cavity for LS301 fluorescence.
Drug: LS301
-LS301 is produced at the Optical Radiology Laboratory at Washington University School of Medicine
Device: Cancer Vision Goggles
-Non-significant risk device
Other Names:
  • CVG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase I only: Safety of LS301 as measured by incidence of related adverse events per patient
Time Frame: From time of injection to 1 hour post-injection
  • Safety evaluation includes vital signs, clinical laboratory testing and ECG, measured pre- (within 10-15 minutes or 30 minutes of injection) and post-injection (within 30 minutes or/and at ~60 minutes).
  • Adverse events will be graded using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0
From time of injection to 1 hour post-injection
Phase I only: Optimal imaging dose of LS301
Time Frame: From time of injection to 1 hour post-injection
  • The optimal will be the dose at which fewer than 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are observed and optimal image quality is observed. It need not be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) if optimal image quality is observed at a lower dose than the MTD
  • DLT is defined as any grade 2 or above toxicity that occurs during the hour after injection that is considered possibly, probably, or definitely related to LS301.
From time of injection to 1 hour post-injection
Phase II only: Ability of LS301 to predict presence of positive margins
Time Frame: At the time of pathological analysis (within 2-3 days of surgery)
  • Margin status called by LS301 and CVG will be compared to the gold standard histopathological results
  • The histopathological results of margin positivity has the following possible results: margin negative, margin positive at LS301 and CVG identified locations, margin positive at LS301 and CVG unidentified locations. Using LS301 and CVG, the exercised tissue will be considered to be margin positive and have ink marked at the identified locations if any positive margins are observed; otherwise, the margin is considered negative.
At the time of pathological analysis (within 2-3 days of surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 31, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201911165

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings