Exercise and Therapeutic Learning Among Women With PTSD
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53719
- University Of Wisconsin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Current diagnosis of PTSD where the index traumatic event includes physical or sexual assault
- English speaking
- Medically healthy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any endorsed medical concerns related to physical activity (as probed in the phone screening questions regarding cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease and as assessed via the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), which probes into participants' history of heart conditions, chest pain, dizziness, loss of consciousness, bone/joint problems, and medication history). Participants would not be excluded if they report this condition being "controlled" or "addressed" through medication or lifestyle change, such as regular exercise.
- Major medical disorders (such as cancer, AIDS)
- Physical discomfort or difficulty with blood draws
- Psychotic disorders
- Intellectual disabilities
- Developmental disorders
- Active substance use disorders
- Pregnancy
Due to safety concerns, participants with these conditions will be ineligible to participate:
- Major medical disorders (e.g., HIV, cancer)
- Daily cannabis use
- History of light headedness or fainting during blood draws or physical activity
- History of chest pain during physical activity
- Abnormal EKG finding at intake visit screening, without follow-up clearance from their physician
- Bone, joint, cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic, or other medical conditions that may be worsened by physical activity (e.g., Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), diabetes, hypertension) that is not currently addressed via medication or lifestyle change.
- A positive pregnancy test
- A self-reported history of loss of consciousness (greater than 30 minutes)
- Physical disabilities that prohibit task performance (such as blindness or deafness)
- Psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia)
- Any other condition that the investigator believes might put the participant at risk
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Moderate Intensity Exercise
Day 1 Assessment, Day 2 Fear Learning, Day 3 Fear Extinction (followed by moderate intensity exercise), Day 4 Recall of Fear Extinction
|
Structured clinical interview to assess trauma history and mental health diagnoses, as well as a screening EKG to assess safety to engage in exercise testing (lasts 3-4 hours)
Participants undergo a standard fear conditioning procedure, in which they learn that one of two geometric shapes (circles or triangles) predict the occurrence of a noxious stimulus (mild electrotactile stimulation).
Day 2 lasts about 1 hour.
Participants undergo a fear extinction procedure, in which participants learn that the geometric shapes no longer predict a noxious stimulus (i.e., safety learning).
Blood samples will be drawn immediately before exercise, and immediately following.
The moderate-intensity aerobic exercise session will consist of a 5 minute warm-up of light intensity activity (40-60% maximum heart rate; MHR) on a treadmill followed by walking or running at a moderate intensity (i.e., between 70-75% MHR) for 30 minutes on Day 3
During Day 4, recall of the fear extinction memory is tested.
Visits on Day 4 occur ~24 hours following Day 3, and lasts about 30 minutes.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Day 1 Assessment, Day 2 Fear Learning, Day 3 Fear Extinction (followed by low intensity exercise), Day 4 Recall of Fear Extinction
|
Structured clinical interview to assess trauma history and mental health diagnoses, as well as a screening EKG to assess safety to engage in exercise testing (lasts 3-4 hours)
Participants undergo a standard fear conditioning procedure, in which they learn that one of two geometric shapes (circles or triangles) predict the occurrence of a noxious stimulus (mild electrotactile stimulation).
Day 2 lasts about 1 hour.
Participants undergo a fear extinction procedure, in which participants learn that the geometric shapes no longer predict a noxious stimulus (i.e., safety learning).
Blood samples will be drawn immediately before exercise, and immediately following.
During Day 4, recall of the fear extinction memory is tested.
Visits on Day 4 occur ~24 hours following Day 3, and lasts about 30 minutes.
Control participants will maintain light-intensity activity (i.e., walking at ~50% of MHR) for the full duration of 30 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant Skin Conductance Responding (SCR)
Time Frame: up to Day 4
|
Aim 1 fear extinction analyses consists of a 2 (group: low-intensity exercise vs moderate-intensity exercise) x 2 (cue: conditioned fear and safety) x 2 (task phase context: learning context vs extinction context) mixed design focused on Day 4 fear responding (skin conductance responses).
SCR data will be acquired on a BIOPAC MP150 Data Acquisition System (BIOPAC Systems, Inc.) with electrodes placed on participant's left hand.
Participants will be instructed to select an intensity of a 7/10 on the subjective pain scale, which should be "uncomfortable, but not painful."
Average intensity of participant skin conductance will be reported.
|
up to Day 4
|
|
Group Differences in Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)
Time Frame: before and after 30 min exercise on Day 3
|
Aim 2 group differences in BDNF consists of a 2 (group: moderate-intensity vs low-intensity) x 2 (cue: conditioned fear and safety) x 2 (task phase context: learning context vs extinction context) x 2 (timepoint: pre condition vs post condition,) mixed design.
The hypothesis is BDNF increases following exercise will separately mediate the relationship between aerobic exercise and enhanced fear extinction recall.
|
before and after 30 min exercise on Day 3
|
|
Group Differences in Serum Endocannabinoid (eCB) Content
Time Frame: before and after 30 min exercise on Day 3
|
Aim 2 group differences in eCB consists of a 2 (group: moderate-intensity vs low-intensity) x 2 (cue: conditioned fear and safety) x 2 (task phase context: learning context vs extinction context) x 2 (timepoint: pre condition vs post condition,) mixed design.
The hypothesis is eCBs increases following exercise will separately mediate the relationship between aerobic exercise and enhanced fear extinction recall.
|
before and after 30 min exercise on Day 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Profile of Mood States (POMS) Questionnaire
Time Frame: at each visit, up to Day 4
|
The POMS survey is a 65-item survey scored on a 5 point Likert Scale (0-4) where 0 s 'not at all' and 4 is 'extremely' for the tension, depression, fatigue, confusion, and anger subscales, and reversed for the vigor and esteem-related affect subscales.
The range of total possible scores is XX-XX with higher numbers indicating more extreme or negative moods.
|
at each visit, up to Day 4
|
|
Change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: at each visit, up to Day 4
|
STAI is a 20-item assessment rated on a 4-point scale from 'almost never' to 'almost always' with the total scores ranging from 20-80.
Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
|
at each visit, up to Day 4
|
|
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)
Time Frame: at each visit, up to Day 4
|
PANAS is comprised of two 10-item scales for both positive and negative affect.
Total combine scoring is from 20-100 where the higher the score the more negative the affect.
|
at each visit, up to Day 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Josh Cisler, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-0845
- A538900 (Other Identifier: UW- Madison)
- SMPH/PSYCHIATRY/PSYCHIATRY (Other Identifier: UW- Madison)
- Protocol Version 11/4/2019 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.