Trajectories of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation (TRAJ-CAV)

September 14, 2020 updated by: Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation

Multicenter International Observational Study to Identify Trajectories of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation and Their Specific Determinants

This project aims: i) to identify Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) trajectories after heat transplantation using latent class mixed modeling, ii) to characterize the global and specific determinants of different trajectories and iii) to provide an easily accessible tool to project individual probability of CAV trajectory belonging.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background:

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) is the third cause of late mortality and the leading cause of late allograft dysfunction. The field of heart transplantation currently lacks longitudinal description of CAV profiles. Identifying relevant CAV trajectories, or evolution profiles, and their respective determinants is an unmet clinical need. CAV trajectories requires an additional level of understanding and characterization over the current paradigm. Understanding the mechanisms and clinical factors involved in the development of CAV will be useful to provide a more nuanced picture of disease progression, which may ultimately contribute to risk stratification and ultimately guiding the care of HTx patients.

Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s):

  • Identification of CAV trajectories after transplantation using an unsupervised latent class mixed modeling. CAV angiograms were recorded per center protocol for all patients after transplantation. CAV was graded according to the current ISHLT classification as CAV 0 (not significant), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe).
  • Determination of clinical, functional, structural, immunological factors associated with the trajectories. In the derivation cohort, the associations between CAV trajectories and clinical, histological, functional, and immunological parameters at the time of transplantation, during the first year and at one-year post-transplant were assessed using multinomial logistic regression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Maarten Naesens
  • France
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Paris Transplant Group
  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90211
        • Jon Kobashigawa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Heart recipients aged over 18 and of all genders recruited between 2004 and 2015 from European and North American centers, who had at least two coronary angiograms during follow-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Heart recipient with at least two coronary angiograms after heart transplantation,
  • Heart recipient over 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with < 2 coronary angiograms during follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of trajectories of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV)
Time Frame: 10 years post-transplant
Identification of different evolutive profiles of CAV using latent classes mixed models. Each coronary angiogram was graded from 0 (no CAV) to 3 (severe CAV) according to ISHLT classification.
10 years post-transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of the specific determinants of CAV trajectories
Time Frame: From transplantation to 1-year post-transplant
Identification of immune and non-immune determinants using multivariable multinomial logistic regression.
From transplantation to 1-year post-transplant
Early prediction of CAV trajectories
Time Frame: 10 years post-transplant
Probability of belonging to each trajectory according to the baseline angiogram and independent risk factors for CAV
10 years post-transplant
Patients and allograft survival probability according the CAV trajectory
Time Frame: 10 years post-transplant
Comparison of prognosis according the CAV trajectory
10 years post-transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
European Georges Pompidou Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alexandre Loupy, MD, PhD, Paris Transplant Group

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ParisTRCOT_CAV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings