Etoricoxib vs Aceclofenac in the Treatment of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

October 28, 2019 updated by: Cheng-Chung Wei, Chung Shan Medical University

Comparison of Lower Dosage of Etoricoxib Versus Aceclofenac in the Treatment of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Single-center, Parallel-group, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Comparison of lower dosage etoricoxib (60 mg daily) with aceclofenac (100 mg bid) for their efficacy and safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a single medical center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, which conducted for eight weeks. In this study, 40 patients of RA were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups (etoricoxib and aceclofenac), and 20 patients were enrolled for each group. In addition to baseline data collection, objective assessment tools were used to evaluate for efficacy and safety. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) , secondary endpoints were the ACR 50,70, disease activity score 28 (DAS 28), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, the number of tender and swollen joints, physician's global assessment, patient's global assessment, pain scores, the short form health survey (SF-36) health Questionnaire and etc. In addition, all adverse reactions were recorded and all the results were analyzed in the intention to treat (ITT) manner.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis as Rheumatoid Arthritis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Pregnant or breast-feeding women. 2. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy in cancer patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Etoricoxib
Etoricoxib 60 mg QD
Drug: Etoricoxib
Etoricoxib 60 mg QD Oral
Other Names:
  • Arcoxia
Experimental: Aceclofenac
Aceclofenac 100 mg BID
Drug: Aceclofenac
Aceclofenac 100 mg BID Oral
Other Names:
  • TONEC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use ACR20 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria (ACR50)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use ACR50 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
American College of Rheumatology 70% improvement criteria (ACR70)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use ACR70 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Disease activity score 28 (DAS28)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use DAS28 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use EULAR responder rate to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
The number of tender and swollen joints
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use the number of tender and swollen joints to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Physician's global assessment (PhGA)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use PhGA to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Patient's global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use PGA to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS)
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use VAS to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8
Quality of life by SF-36
Time Frame: week 0, week 8
The investigators use SF-36 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0
week 0, week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chung Shan Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CS07005

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings